Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Right (to a) Diagnosis? Establishing Correct Diagnoses in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Neuroethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronic disorders of consciousness, particularly the vegetative and the minimally conscious states, pose serious diagnostic challenges to neurologists and clinical psychologists. A look at the concept of “diagnosis” in medicine reveals its social construction: While medical categorizations are intended to describe facts in the real world, they are nevertheless dependent on conventions and agreements between experts and practitioners. For chronic disorders of consciousness in particular, the terminology has proven problematic and controversial over the years. Novel research utilizing functional brain imaging has demonstrated that a substantial number of patients retain their capabilities to communicate by brain activity even when they are incapable of classic verbal and nonverbal responses due to the dysfunction of their motor behavior. Moreover, thorough diagnostic assessments constitute the foundations for suitable rehabilitation measures. Thus, ethical arguments support the claim that the potential of emerging methods for communication via brain activity should be evaluated comprehensively in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness, once the technological methodology for this endeavor progresses to a reliable and affordable stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Childs, N.L., W.N. Mercer, and H.W. Childs. 1993. Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology 43(8): 1465–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews, K., L. Murphy, R. Munday, and C. Littlewood. 1996. Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. British Medical Journal 313(7048): 13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Monti, M.M., A. Vanhaudenhuyse, M.R. Coleman, M. Boly, J.D. Pickard, L. Tshibanda, A.M. Owen, and S. Laureys. 2010. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. New England Journal of Medicine 362(7): 579–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernat, J.L. 2009. Chronic consciousness disorders. Annual Review of Medicine 60: 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McQuillen, M.P. 2001. Pearls and pitfalls of ethical issues in neurology. Seminars in Neurology 21(4): 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jennett, B., and F. Plum. 1972. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet 1(7753): 734–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kretschmer, E. 1940. Das apallische Syndrom. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 169: 576–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. 1994. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (first of two parts). New England Journal of Medicine 330(21): 1499–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. 1994. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (second of two parts). New England Journal of Medicine 330(21): 1572–1579.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giacino, J.T., S. Ashwal, N. Childs, R. Cranford, B. Jennett, D.I. Katz, J.P. Kelly, J.H. Rosenberg, J. Whyte, R.D. Zafonte, and N.D. Zasler. 2002. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58(3): 349–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laureys, S., G.G. Celesia, F. Cohadon, J. Lavrijsen, J. León-Carrión, W.G. Sannita, L. Sazbon, E. Schmutzhard, K.R. von Wild, A. Zeman, G. Dolce, and European Task Force on Disorders of Consciousness. 2010. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Medicine 8: 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brukamp, K. 2012. Vegetative state?—a definition revisited. In Vegetative state: a paradigmatic problem of modern societies, eds. R.J. Jox, K. Kuehlmeyer, G. Marckmann, and E. Racine. Münster (Germany): LIT.

  13. Owen, A.M., M.R. Coleman, M. Boly, M.H. Davis, S. Laureys, and J.D. Pickard. 2006. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 313(5792): 1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2008. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Medical Association. 2008. Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/. Accessed 13 July 2011.

  16. Hume, D. 1739/2000. A treatise of human nature, eds. D.F. Norton and M.J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  17. Brown, P. 1995. Naming and framing: the social construction of diagnosis and illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 35: 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Conrad, P., and K.K. Barker. 2010. The social construction of illness: key insights and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51(S): S67–S79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McLean, S.A.M. 1999. Legal and ethical aspects of the vegetative state. Journal of Clinical Pathology 52: 490–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gill-Thwaites, H., and R. Munday. 2004. The Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique (SMART): a valid and reliable assessment for vegetative state and minimally conscious state patients. Brain Injury 18(12): 1255–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schnakers, C., A. Vanhaudenhuyse, J. Giacino, M. Ventura, M. Boly, S. Majerus, G. Moonen, and S. Laureys. 2009. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurology 9: 35. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Coleman, M.R., M.H. Davis, J.M. Rodd, T. Robson, A. Ali, A.M. Owen, and J.D. Pickard. 2009. Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain 132: 2541–2552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bardin, J.C., J.J. Fins, D.I. Katz, J. Hersh, L.A. Heier, K. Tabelow, J.P. Dyke, D.J. Ballon, N.D. Schiff, and H.U. Voss. 2011. Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of cognitive function after brain injury. Brain 134(Pt 3): 769–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fins, J.J., J. Illes, J.L. Bernat, J. Hirsch, S. Laureys, and E. Murphy. 2008. Neuroimaging and disorders of consciousness: envisioning an ethical research agenda. The American Journal of Bioethics 8(9): 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for History, Theory, and Ethics of Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen University, Wendlingweg 2, 52074, Aachen, Germany

    Kirsten Brukamp

Authors
  1. Kirsten Brukamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsten Brukamp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brukamp, K. Right (to a) Diagnosis? Establishing Correct Diagnoses in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness. Neuroethics 6, 5–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9154-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9154-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation