Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of volumetric 4′-[methyl-11C]-thiothymidine PET/CT parameters for prediction of the clinical outcome of head and neck cancer patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This prospective study compared the value of pretreatment 4′-[methyl-11C]-thiothymidine (11C-4DST) volumetric parameters and those of 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-d-glucose (18F-FDG) in predicting the clinical outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods

Fifty patients with HNSCC underwent 11C-4DST PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT prior to anticancer therapy. 18F-FDG metabolic tumor volume (18F-FDG MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated from 18F-FDG PET, and 11C-4DST MTV and total lesion proliferation (TLP) were calculated from 11C-4DST PET. All parameters were measured for the primary lesion and metastatic lymph nodes. Associations between clinical factors and PET/CT parameters and prognostic value were analyzed.

Results

Receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that MTV, TLG, and TLP acquired from the primary lesion and metastatic lymph nodes were good parameters for predicting disease relapse and death. The area under the curves (AUCs) ranged from 0.63 to 0.71 for 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters. The AUCs of 11C-4DST PET/CT parameters were larger than those of 18F-FDG (range 0.72–0.81). Univariate analysis revealed that individuals with tumors showing a high value for any PET/CT parameter were at a significantly increased risk of relapse. Upon multivariate analysis, 18F-FDG MTV, 11C-4DST MTV and 11C-4DST TLP were significant independent factors for relapse-free survival (P = 0.04, P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0005, respectively).

Conclusion

Pretreatment 11C-4DST PET/CT volume-based parameters can provide important prognostic information about patients with HNSCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allal AS, Dulguerov P, Allaoua M, Haenggeli CA, el El-Ghazi A, Lehmann W, et al. Standardized uptake value of 2-[18F] Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose in predicting outcome in head and neck carcinomas treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1398–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong RJ, Lin DT, Schöder H, Gonen M, Wolden S, Pfister DG, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4199–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Minn H, Lapela M, Klemi PJ, Grénman R, Leskinen S, Lindholm P, et al. Prediction of survival with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and PET in head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1907–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schinagl DA, Span PN, Oyen WJ, Kaanders JH. Can FDG PET predict radiation treatment outcome in head and neck cancer? Results of a prospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1449–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Soto DE, Kessler ML, Piert M, Eisbruch A. Correlation between pretreatment FDG-PET biological target volume and anatomical location of failure after radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. Radiother Oncol. 2008;89:13–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Moon SH, Choi JY, Lee HJ, Son YI, Baek CH, Ahn YC, et al. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil: comparisons of volume-based metabolic parameters. Head Neck. 2013;35:15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Francis DL, Freeman A, Visvikis D, Costa DC, Luthra SK, Novelli M, et al. In vivo imaging of cellular proliferation in colorectal cancer using positron emission tomography. Gut. 2003;52:1602–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. van Westreenen HL, Cobben DC, Jager PL, van Dullemen HM, Wesseling J, Elsinga PH, et al. Comparison of 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:400–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Ishikawa S, Nakano J, Chang SS, Bandoh S, et al. Correlation of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake on PET with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1610–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoeben BA, Troost EG, Span PN, van Herpen CM, Bussink J, Oyen WJ, et al. 18F-FLT PET during radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is an early predictor of outcome. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:532–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahraman D, Holstein A, Scheffler M, Zander T, Nogova L, Lammertsma AA, et al. Tumor lesion glycolysis and tumor lesion proliferation for response prediction and prognostic differentiation in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:1058–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoshikawa H, Mori T, Yamamoto Y, Kishino T, Fukumura T, Samukawa Y, et al. Prognostic value comparison between 18F-FLT PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT volume-based metabolic parameters in patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40:464–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Been LB, Suurmeijer AJ, Cobben DC, Jager PL, Hoekstra HJ, Elsinga PH. [18F]FLT-PET in oncology: current status and opportunities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:1659–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Toyohara J, Kumata K, Fukushi K, Irie T, Suzuki K. Evaluation of 4′-[methyl-14C]thiothymidine for in vivo DNA synthesis imaging. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1717–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Toyohara J, Okada M, Toramatsu C, Suzuki K, Irie T. Feasibility studies of 4′-[methyl-(11)C]thiothymidine as a tumor proliferation imaging agent in mice. Nucl Med Biol. 2008;35:67–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Minamimoto R, Toyohara J, Ito H, Seike A, Miyata Y, Morooka M, et al. A pilot study of 4′-[methyl-11C]-thiothymidine PET/CT for detection of regional lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2014;4:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Minamimoto R, Toyohara J, Seike A, Endo H, Morooka M, Nakajima K, et al. 4′-[Methyl-11C]-thiothymidine PET/CT for proliferation imaging in non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(2):199–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Toyohara J, Nariai T, Sakata M, Oda K, Ishii K, Kawabe T, et al. Whole-body distribution and brain tumor imaging with 11C-4DST: a pilot study. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1322–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Toorongian SA, Mulholland GK, Jewett DM, Bachelor MA, Kilbourn MR. Routine production of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose by direct nucleophilic exchange on a quaternary 4-aminopyridinium resin. Nucl Med Biol. 1990;17:273–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lim R, Eaton A, Lee NY, Setton J, Ohri N, Rao S, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1506–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park GC, Kim JS, Roh JL, Choi SH, Nam SY, Kim SY. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT in advanced-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:208–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang C, Murphy JD, Khong B, La TH, Kong C, Fischbein NJ, et al. Validation that metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:1514–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chung MK, Jeong HS, Park SG, Jang JY, Son YI, Choi JY, et al. Metabolic tumor volume of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts short-term outcome to radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in pharyngeal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5861–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan SC, Chang JT, Lin CY, Ng SH, Wang HM, Liao CT, et al. Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET parameters in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: predictive role for different survival endpoints and impact on prognostic stratification. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32:989–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kitao T, Hirata K, Shima K, Hayashi T, Sekizawa M, Takei T, et al. Reproducibility and uptake time dependency of volume-based parameters on FDG-PET for lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:576. doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2624-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Koyasu S, Nakamoto Y, Kikuchi M, Suzuki K, Hayashida K, Itoh K, et al. Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters including visual evaluation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:851–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mier W, Haberkorn U, Eisenhut M. [18F]FLT; portrait of a proliferation marker. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:165–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rasey JS, Grierson JR, Wiens LW. Validation of FLT uptake as a measure of thymidine kinase-1 activity in A549 carcinoma cells. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1210–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Plotnik DA, Wu S, Linn GR, Yip FC, Comandante NL, Krohn KA, et al. In vitro analysis of transport and metabolism of 4′-thiothymidine in human tumor cells. Nucl Med Biol. 2015;45:470–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Toyota Y, Miyake K, Kawai N, Hatakeyama T, Yamamoto Y, Toyohara J, et al. Comparison of 4′-[methyl-11C]thiothymidine (11C-4DST) and 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET/CT in human brain glioma imaging. EJNMMI Res. 2015;5:7. doi:10.1186/s13550-015-0085-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hoeben BA, Troost EG, Bussink J, van Herpen CM, Oyen WJ, Kaanders JH. 18F-FLT PET changes during radiotherapy combined with cetuximab in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Nuklearmedizin. 2014;53:60–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ito K, Yokoyama J, Miyata Y, Toyohara J, Okasaki M, Minamimoto R, et al. Volumetric comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography using 4′-[methyl-11C]-thiothymidine with 2-deoxy-2-18F-fluoro-d-glucose in patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2015;36:219–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hanamoto A, Tatsumi M, Takenaka Y, Hamasaki T, Yasui T, Nakahara S, et al. Volumetric PET/CT parameters predict local response of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma to chemoradiotherapy. Cancer Med. 2014;3:1368–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Pak K, Cheon GJ, Nam HY, Kim SJ, Kang KW, Chung JK, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kim EE, Lee DS. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:884–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (http://www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Hoshikawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoshikawa, H., Mori, T., Maeda, Y. et al. Influence of volumetric 4′-[methyl-11C]-thiothymidine PET/CT parameters for prediction of the clinical outcome of head and neck cancer patients. Ann Nucl Med 31, 63–70 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-016-1131-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-016-1131-6

Keywords

Navigation