Skip to main content
Log in

Fast Monte Carlo-simulator with full collimator and detector response modelling for SPECT

  • Technical note
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Monte Carlo (MC)-simulations have proved to be a valuable tool in studying SPECT-reconstruction algorithms. Despite their popularity, the use of Monte Carlo-simulations is still often limited by their large computation demand. This is especially true in situations where full collimator and detector modelling with septal penetration, scatter and X-ray fluorescence needs to be included. This paper presents a rapid and simple MC-simulator, which can effectively reduce the computation times.

Methods

The simulator was built on the convolution-based forced detection principle, which can markedly lower the number of simulated photons. Full collimator and detector response look-up tables are pre-simulated and then later used in the actual MC-simulations to model the system response. The developed simulator was validated by comparing it against 123I point source measurements made with a clinical gamma camera system and against 99mTc software phantom simulations made with the SIMIND MC-package.

Results

The results showed good agreement between the new simulator, measurements and the SIMIND-package. The new simulator provided near noise-free projection data in approximately 1.5 min per projection with 99mTc, which was less than one-tenth of SIMIND’s time.

Conclusion

The developed MC-simulator can markedly decrease the simulation time without sacrificing image quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ljungberg M, Strand S-E, King MA. Monte Carlo calculations in nuclear medicine. Bristol: IOP Publishing Ltd; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Jong H, Slijpen E, Beekman F. Acceleration of Monte Carlo SPECT simulation using convolution based forced detection. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2001;48:58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beekman F, de Jong H, van Geloven S. Efficient fully 3D iterative SPECT reconstruction with Monte Carlo based scatter compensation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21:867–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sohlberg A, Watabe H, Iida H. Acceleration of Monte Carlo-based scatter compensation for cardiac SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:N277–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Staelens S, de Wit T, Beekman F. Fast hybrid SPECT simulation including efficient septal penetration modelling (SP-PSF). Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:3027–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jan S, Santin G, Strul D, Staelens S (OpenGATE Collaboration). GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:4543–61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Woodcock E, Murphy T, Hemmings P, Longworth S. Techniques used in the GEM code for Monte Carlo neutronics calculations in reactors and other systems of complex geometry. In: Proceedings of the conference on applications of computing methods to reactor problems. 1965; p 557.

  8. Berger MJ, Hubbell JH. XCOM: photon cross sections on a personal computer. National Bureau of Standards: Gaithersburg. NBSIR 87-3597; 1987.

  9. Cherry SR, Sorenson JA, Phelps ME. Physics in nuclear medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ljungberg M, Strand S-E. A Monte Carlo program simulating scintillation camera imaging. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 1989;29:257–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pretorius PH, King MA, Tsui BM, LaCroix KJ, Xia W. A mathematical model of motion of the heart for use in generating source and attenuation maps for simulating emission imaging. Med Phys. 1999;26:2323–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sohlberg A, Watabe H, Shidahara M, Iida H. Body-contour versus circular orbit acquisition in cardiac SPECT: assessment of defect detectability with channelized Hotelling observer. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28:937–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Song X, Segars WP, Du Y, Tsui BMW, Frey EC. Fast modelling of the collimator–detector response in Monte Carlo simulation of SPECT imaging using the angular response function. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:1791–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsoumpas C, Buerger C, King AP, Mollet P, Keereman V, Vandenberghe S, Schulz V, Schleyer P, Schaeffter T, Marsden PK. Fast generation of 4D PET-MR data from real dynamic MR acquisitions. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:6597–613.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Du Y, Tsui BMW, Frey EC. Model-based compensation for quantitative 123I brain SPECT imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:1269–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ljungberg M, Larsson A, Johansson L. A new collimator simulation in SIMIND based on the delta-scattering technique. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2005;52:1370–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rault E, Staelens S, Van Holen R, De Beenhouwer J, Vandenberghe S. Accurate Monte Carlo modelling of the back compartments of SPECT cameras. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:87–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A. Sohlberg has a consulting agreement with HERMES Medical Solutions, Stockholm, Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antti O. Sohlberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sohlberg, A.O., Kajaste, M.T. Fast Monte Carlo-simulator with full collimator and detector response modelling for SPECT. Ann Nucl Med 26, 92–98 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-011-0550-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-011-0550-7

Keywords

Navigation