Skip to main content
Log in

The validity of multi-center common normal database for identifying myocardial ischemia: Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine working group database

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine (JSNM) working group has created a myocardial perfusion imaging database applicable to standard acquisition protocol. The aim of this study is to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the common normal database compared with the expert interpretation of each institute.

Methods

Five institutions participated in this study and used different acquisition settings which included 360°/180° rotation, camera configuration and camera orbits. The software and its version used in each institution also varied. The working group database was applied to detect the culprit coronary territory from a total of 166 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and 145 patients with low-likelihood of CAD.

Results

When summed stress score ≥4 was defined as significant abnormality, overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of patient-based analysis were 77, 72 and 75%, respectively, based on quantitative analysis using the common database, whereas those by institutional visual expert reading were 72, 79 and 75%, respectively.

Conclusion

The common database, which was created by a multi-center working group and separated between male/female with 180/360° acquisitions, demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracy to expert interpretation by each institute, and it may be applicable to multi-center studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Slomka PJ, Van Kriekinge SD, Pollard G, Berman DS. Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: the Cedars-Sinai approach. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:433–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia EV, Faber TL, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Chen J, Santana C. The increasing role of quantification in clinical nuclear cardiology: the Emory approach. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:420–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ficaro EP, Lee BC, Kritzman JN, Corbett JR. Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:455–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakajima K, Kumita S, Ishida Y, Momose M, Hashimoto J, Morita K, et al. Creation and characterization of Japanese standards for myocardial perfusion SPECT: database from the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine Working Group. Ann Nucl Med. 2007;21:505–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuo S, Nakajima K, Yamashina S, Sakata K, Momose M, Hashimoto J, et al. Characterization of Japanese standards for myocardial sympathetic and metabolic imaging in comparison with perfusion imaging. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:517–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Akhter N, Nakajima K, Okuda K, Matsuo S, Yoneyama T, Taki J, et al. Regional wall thickening in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in a Japanese population: effect of sex, radiotracer, rotation angles and frame rates. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1608–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Akincioglu C, Abidov A, Friedman JD, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:66–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Kang X, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, et al. Automatic quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest change: a new measure of ischemia. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:183–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Knollmann D, Knebel I, Koch KC, Gebhard M, Krohn T, Buell U, et al. Comparison of SSS and SRS calculated from normal databases provided by QPS and 4D-MSPECT manufacturers and from identical institutional normals. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakajima K, Okuda K, Kawano M, Matsuo S, Slomka P, Germano G, et al. The importance of population-specific normal database for quantification of myocardial ischemia: comparison between Japanese 360 and 180-degree databases and a US database. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:422–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eisner RL, Nowak DJ, Pettigrew R, Fajman W. Fundamentals of 180 degree acquisition and reconstruction in SPECT imaging. J Nucl Med. 1986;27:1717–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Train KF, Areeda J, Garcia EV, Cooke CD, Maddahi J, Kiat H, et al. Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT: definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1494–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bice AN, Clausen M, Loncaric S, Wagner HN Jr. Comparison of transaxial resolution in 180 degrees and 360 degrees SPECT with a rotating scintillation camera. Eur J Nucl Med. 1987;13:7–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tamaki N, Mukai T, Ishii Y, Fujita T, Yamamoto K, Minato K, et al. Comparative study of thallium emission myocardial tomography with 180 degrees and 360 degrees data collection. J Nucl Med. 1982;23:661–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Go RT, MacIntyre WJ, Houser TS, Pantoja M, O’Donnell JK, Feiglin DH, et al. Clinical evaluation of 360 degrees and 180 degrees data sampling techniques for transaxial SPECT thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 1985;26:695–706.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elhendy A, Sozzi FB, van Domburg RT, Bax JJ, Geleijnse ML, Valkema R, et al. Accuracy of exercise stress technetium 99m sestamibi SPECT imaging in the evaluation of the extent and location of coronary artery disease in patients with an earlier myocardial infarction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2000;7:432–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Forster S, Rieber J, Ubleis C, Weiss M, Bartenstein P, Cumming P, et al. Tc-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 (epub ahead of print).

  18. Nakajima K, Nishimura T. Inter-institution preference-based variability of ejection fraction and volumes using quantitative gated SPECT with 99mTc-tetrofosmin: a multicentre study involving 106 hospitals. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:127–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was performed as part of the JSNM working group activity and supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research in Japan (PI: Kenichi Nakajima). We also thank GE Yokogawa Medical Systems for providing a workstation for data processing. The research version of QPS software was supplied by Drs Germano and Slomka (Cedars Sinai Medical Center, USA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenichi Nakajima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakajima, K., Matsuo, S., Kawano, M. et al. The validity of multi-center common normal database for identifying myocardial ischemia: Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine working group database. Ann Nucl Med 24, 99–105 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-009-0331-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-009-0331-8

Keywords

Navigation