Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Feminist and Antifeminist Everyday Activism: Tactical Choices, Emotions, and ‘Humor’

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Gender Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking inspiration from responses in focus groups and an on-line survey in which feminists shared their experiences about antifeminism in their daily life, this paper demonstrates that everyday activism involves two protagonists confronting each other, in this case a feminist and an antifeminist. Focusing on feminists’ perceptions, emotions and tactical reactions, this paper also shows how these confrontations are not necessarily limited to one or two attacks and counterattacks and how they can be influenced by the presence of a ‘third party’ (other men or women, other feminists or antifeminists). In order to shed light on these conflictual dynamics, the question of antifeminist ‘humor’ and its effects on feminists is discussed more in depth. Finally, we show that there is a significant relation between public or organized activism and everyday activism, for both the social movement and its countermovement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Feminists are not the only people interested in how activism intersects with everyday life. Environmentalism, for instance, claims that every individual can save the planet with small everyday acts and veganism rejects the use of animal products in meals, clothing and beauty products, etc. The LGBTQI movement has also a variety of publications on the subject, including Everyday Activism: A Handbook for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People and Their Allies ([58]. Hyers [38], p 541) talks about “activism on the interpersonal front” in her study on the choices made by gay and bisexual men to keep silent or to respond assertively when they “feel wronged by incidents of everyday heterosexism” (see also [64], with regard to trans people who practice digital storytelling). Finally, Essed [22] studied “everyday racism” in the United States and warns against the temptation of proposing a strict dichotomy between “institutional racism” (macro level) in the public sphere and “individual racism” (micro level) in the private sphere (see also [14]: 19, [39]: 81, [21]).

  2. In studies published in French, authors often use the term militantisme au quotidien (everyday activism) not to discuss activism in personal relationships, but instead union and grassroot association members’ involvement on the ground (Cultiaux and Vendramin [13]). In October 2016, a one-day workshop on everyday activism was organized by Montserrat Emperador Badimon and Marcos Ancelovici at the Université Lyon 2 (entitled “‘Sous les pavés, le quotidien!’: regards croisés sur l’imbrication entre vie quotidienne et militantisme”). The large majority of presentations discussed how individuals commit to supporting activist public organizations or mobilizations. Also in French, Henry [33] has published a short book on daily chauvinism. Finally, the online project Sexisme ordinaire (ordinary sexism) provides a platform for women to “collect cases of sexism they experience in their everyday lives. […] By sharing your story, you can show the world that sexism really does exist, that women experience it every day, and that it’s a legitimate problem to be discussed.” [http://francais.everydaysexism.com] In English, another study used the term everyday activism to describe the experience of the daughters of feminist mothers [57].

  3. Although quite similar, everyday activism as discussed by Mansbridge is nevertheless distinct from the speech and practices of subaltern individuals (slaves, for instance) studied by James Scott. In the latter case, the subaltern individual avoids triggering a direct conflict with the dominant group (slave-masters, for instance), but keeps alive their rebellious spirit against structural injustice by quietly sharing and spreading a “hidden transcript” of stories, legends, rumours, jokes and songs [55]. In Mansbridge’s definition, the ‘everyday activist’ seeks open conflict with her or his political opponent.

  4. One limit of the survey is that it provided only two choices, and no reference to a third position, such as being ‘non-feminist’ (see Nelson et al. [51]).

  5. The expression mansplaining refers to men who explain things to women (events and situations, ideas, theories, etc.) that have to do with women’ lived experiences (and that often the man doesn’t know about at all) [56].

References

  1. Achin, C., & Naudier, D. (2010). Trajectoire de femmes « ordinaires» dans les années 1970: La fabrique de la puissance d’agir féministe. Sociologie, 1, 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Achin, C., & Naudier, D. (2013). L’agency en contexte: Réflexions sur les processus d’émancipation des femmes dans la décennie 1970 en France. Cahiers du Genre, 55, 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed, S. (2010). Feminist killjoys (and other willful subjects). The Scholar and Feminist Online, 8, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avanza, M. (2018). Plea for an emic approach toward ‘ugly movement’: Lessons from the divisions within the Italian pro-life movement. Politics and Governance, 6(3), 112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bean, K. (2007). Post-backlash feminism: Women and the media since Reagan-Bush. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bergson, H. (2008). Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic, Rockville (Maryland), Arc Manor.

  7. Bilge, S. (2010). De l’analogie à l’articulation: Théoriser la différenciation sociale et l’inégalité complexe. L’Homme et la société, 176–177, 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blais, M. (2013). Negotiating the representation of the December 6th massacre or when feminism and anti-feminism meet in the same film. Canadian Journal of Film Studies, 22(1), 118–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyd, S. (2004). Backlash against feminism: Canadian custody and access reform debates of the late twentieth century. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 16(2), 255–290.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bratich, J., & Banet-Weiser, S. (2019). From pick-up artists to incels: Con(fidence) games, networked misogyny, and the failure of neoliberalism. International Journal of Communication, 13, 5003–5027.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, V., Garner, N., Higonnet, S., & Ketu, M. K. (Eds.). (1996). Anti-Feminism in the Academy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Critchley, S. (2002). On Humour. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cultiaux, J., & Vendramin, P. (2011). Militer au quotidien: Regard prospectif sur le travail syndical de terrain. Presses Universitaires de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Das Gupta, T. (2009). Real Nurses and Others: Racism in Nursing. Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Maricourt, C., Burrell, S.R. (2021). #MeToo or #MenToo? Expressions of backlash and masculinity politics in the #MeToo era. Journal of Men’s Studies, first published on line, 1–21.

  16. Descarries, F. (2015). L’antiféminisme, expression sociopolitique du sexisme et de la misogynie: ‘C’est la faute au féminisme!’. In: D. Lamoureux, F. Dupuis-Déri (eds.), Les antiféminismes: Analyse d’un discours réactionnaire, Montréal: Remue-Ménage, pp 75–90.

  17. Devreux, A.-M., & Lamoureux, D. (2012). Les antiféminismes: une nébuleuse aux manifestations tangibles. Cahiers du genre [France], (52) et Recherches féministes [Québec], 25(1).

  18. Dignam, P.A., Rohlinger, D.A. (2019). Misogynistic men online: How the red pill helped elect trump. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(3), 589–612

  19. Dragiewicz, M. (2010). A left realist approach to antifeminist fathers’ rights groups. Crime, Law and Social Change, 54(2), 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elder, L., Greene, S., & Lizotte, M.-K. (2021). Feminist and anti-feminist identification in the 21st century United States. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 42(3), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eliasoph, N. (1999). “Everyday racism” in a culture of political avoidance: Civil society, speech, and taboo. Social Problems, 46(4), 479–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Essed, P. (2002) Everyday racism: A new approach to the study of racism. In: P. Essed, D.T. Goldberg (eds.), Race Critical Theories. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers.

  23. Flesher Fominaya, C. (2007). The role of humor in the process of collective identity formation in autonomous social mouvement groups in contemporary Madrid. International Review of Social History, 52, 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Flood, M. (2012). Separated fathers and the ‘Fathers rights’ movement. Journal of Family Studies, 18(2–3), 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Flood, M., Dragiewicz, M., & Pease, B. (2020). Resistance and backlash to gender equality. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56, 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Frye, M. (1983). The Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory. Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gory, G. (2011). L’organisation du discours masculiniste au début du XXIème siècle (1989–2010). Master dissertation, Université de Bordeaux.

  28. Gotell, L., & Dutton, E. (2016). Sexual Violence in the ‘Manosphere’: Antifeminist Men’s Rights Discourses on Rape. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(2), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haenfler, R., Johnson, B., & Jones, E. (2012). Lifestyle movements: Exploring the intersection of lifestyle and social movements. Social Movement Studies, 11(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hammer, R. (2002) Antifeminism and Family Terrorism: A Critical Feminist Perspective. Boston, Rowman & Littlefield.

  31. Hanisch, C. (2000 [1970]). The personal is political. In: B.A. Crow (ed.), Radical Feminism: A Documentary Reader, New York, New York University Press.

  32. Hart, M. (2007). Humour and social protest: An introduction. International Review of Social History, 52(15), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Henry, N. (2011) Les mecs lourds ou le paternalisme lubrique, Mayenne, Gender Company.

  34. Collins, P. H. (2008). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hoffman, B., Ware, J., & Shapiro, E. (2020). Assessing the Threat of Incel Violence. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 43(7), 565–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hooks, B. (1999). Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hyers, L. L. (2007). Resisting prejudice every day: Exploring women’s assertive responses to anti-black racism, anti-semitism, heterosexism, and sexism. Sex Roles, 56(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hyers, L. L. (2010). Alternatives to silence in face-to-face encounters with everyday heterosexism: Activism on the interpersonal front. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 539–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jean-Klein, I. (2001). Nationalism and resistance: The two faces of everyday activism in Palestine during the Intifada. Cultural Anthropology, 16, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jordan, A. (2016). Conceptualizing backlash: (UK) Men’s rights groups, anti-feminism, and postfeminism. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 28(1), 18–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Joubert, L. (2002) L'humour du sexe: Le rire des filles, Montréal, Triptyque.

  42. Keskinen, S. (2013). Antifeminism and white identity politics: Political antagonisms in radical right-wing populist and anti-immigration rhetoric in Finland. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 3(4), 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing Against Equality. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lafontaine, T. (2016). Le stand-up comme espace de résistance et de transformation, Master dissertation, Études littéraires, UQAM.

  45. Lawrence, E., Ringrose, J. (2018). @NoToFeminism, #FeministsAreUgly and Misandry Memes: How social media feminist humour is calling out anti-feminism. In: Jessalynn, K., Ryan, M.E. (eds.) Emergent Feminisms: Complicating a Postfeminist Media Culture, London: Routledge.

  46. Mansbridge, J. (2013) Everyday activism. In: David, S., della Porta, D., Klandermans, B., McAdam, D. (eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, vol. I (A-E), Amsterdam: Wiley-Blackwell: 437–438.

  47. Mansbridge, J., & Flaster, K. (2007). The cultural politics of everyday discourse: The case of “Male chauvinist.” Critical Sociology, 33(4), 627–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mansbridge, J., & Shames, S. L. (2008). Toward a theory of Backlash: Dynamic résistance and the central rôle of power. Politics and Gender, 4, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mottl, T. L. (1980). The analysis of countermovement. Social Problems, 27, 620–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nadal, K. L., Sriken, J., Kristin, C., Davidoff, W., & Yinglee, M. K. (2013). Microagressons within families: Experiences of multiracial people. Family Relations, 62(1), 190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nelson, L. J., Shanahan, S. B., & Olivetti, J. (1997). Power, empowerment, and equality: Evidence for the motive of feminists, nonfeminists, and antifeminists. Sex Roles, 37(3–4), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Portwood-Stacer, L. (2018). Micropolitics. In B. Franks, N. Jun, & L. Williams (Eds.), Anarchism: A Conceptual Approach (pp. 129–141). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Sanders, V., & Delap, L. (2010). Victorian and Edwardian Anti-Feminism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Schmitz, R. M., & Kazyak, E. (2016). Masculinities in cyberspace: An analysis of portrayals of manhood in Men’s rights activist websites. Social Sciences, 5, 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Scott, J. (1992). Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Solnit, R. (2014) Men Explain Things To Me, Chicago, Haymarket Books & Dispatch Books.

  57. Stephenson-Abetz, J. (2012). Everyday activism as a dialogic practice: Narratives of feminist daughters. Women’s Studies in Communication, 35(1), 96–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Stevenson, M. R., & Cogan, J. C. (Eds.). (2003). Everyday Activism: A Handbook for lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People and Their Allies. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sue, D. W., & Spanierman, L. B. (2010). Microagressions in Everday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say?! Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Useem, B., & Zald, M. N. (2009). From pressure group to social movement: Efforts to promote use of nuclear power. In M. N. Zald & J. D. McCarthy (Eds.), Social Movements in an Organizational Society (pp. 273–288). Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  62. van Wormer, K. (2011). Anti-feminist backlash and violence against women worldwide. Social Work and Society: International Online Journal, 9, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Verloo, M. (Ed.). (2018). Varieties of Opposition to Gender Equality in Europe. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Vivienne, S. (2011). Trans digital storytelling: Everyday activism, mutable identity and the problem of visibility. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 7(1), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Walker, N. (1981). Do feminist ever laugh? Women’s humor and Women’s rights. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 4, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wallace, M. (2015 [2nd ed.]). Black Macho and the Myth of the Superwomen. London, New York, Verso.

  67. Walton, S.J. (2012) Anti-feminism and misoyny in Breivik’s ‘Manifesto’, NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2011.650707.

  68. Zald, M.N., & Useem, B. (1982). Movement and countermovement: Loosely coupled conflict. Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, Sept. 8th.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This text was written as part of a research project initiated by L’R des Centres de femmes du Québec (L’R of the women's centres of Quebec), in partnership with the Institut de recherches et d’études féministes (IREF) (Institute of feminist studies) and the Réseau québécois en études féministes (RéQEF) (Quebec network of feminist studies), as well as with the Protocole/Relais-femme (Protocol with women) under UQAM’s service to the communities (SAC-UQAM). The research team includes, in addition to the two authors, Odile Boisclair (L’R), Lyne Kurtzman and Ève-Marie Lampron (SAC-UQAM), as well as a research assistant participating at the planning meetings, Marie Soleil Chrétien. This work was initiated with the financial help of the Fonds de recherche Société et Culture Québec (FRQSC), through the Réseau québécois en études féministes (RéQEF), and supported by a grant from the Protocole/Relais-femme (SAC-UQAM). The text has been translated from a French unpublished version, by Elle Warkentin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université du Québec en Outaouais (UQO), Gatineau, QC, Canada

    Mélissa Blais

  2. Université du Québec À Montréal (UQAM), Montréal, QC, Canada

    Francis Dupuis-Déri

Authors
  1. Mélissa Blais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francis Dupuis-Déri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mélissa Blais.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blais, M., Dupuis-Déri, F. Feminist and Antifeminist Everyday Activism: Tactical Choices, Emotions, and ‘Humor’. Gend. Issues 39, 275–290 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-021-09290-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-021-09290-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation