Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Promotional Opportunities: How Women in Corrections Perceive their Chances for Advancement at Work

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Gender Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utilizing a theoretically derived sample, selected women who worked in corrections were interviewed in order to better understand what barriers women thought most impeded their success in moving up the organizational ladder. This work rests on the qualitative case study methodology. Three major themes emerged from interviews. Women believed that their chances for promotion within corrections were negatively impacted by: a belief that they could not perform the job as well as comparable men, an environment marked by sexual harassment, and problems in balancing work and home responsibilities. Male correctional officers were viewed as dominating the field. Further, there was a belief among these women, who worked in corrections, that comparable men were generally perceived as more capable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this work, the term ‘corrections’ or the ‘correctional setting’ is conceptualized as being the employment area for the participants, whether it is community, institutional, or administrational. The terms encompass various staff roles that are available; such as counselors, correctional officers, supervisors, superintendents, or directors. Promotional opportunities are defined as job advancements which may or may not include a pay increase and/or supervision of other employees. These promotions can be at a vertical level as well as at a horizontal level.

References

  1. Armytage, P., Martyres, K., & Feiner, M. (2000). Females in corrections: Getting the balance right. Presented at the Women in Corrections: Staff and Clients Conference convened by the Australian Institute of Criminology in conjunction with the Department for Correctional Services SA, October/November, Adelaide.

  2. Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Camp, S. D., & Langan, N. P. (2005). Perceptions about minority and female opportunities for job advancements: Are beliefs about equal opportunities fixed? The Prison Journal, 85, 399–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Camp, S. D., Steifer, T. L., & Batchelder, J. A. (1995). Perceptions of job advancement opportunities: A multilevel investigation of race and gender effects. Federal Bureau of Prisons & Indiana State University.

  5. Carlson, J. R., Thomas, G., & Anson, R. H. (2004). Cross-gender perceptions of corrections officers in gender-segregated prisons. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cassirer, N., & Reskin, B. (2000). High hopes: Organizational position, employment experiences, and women’s and men’s promotion aspirations. Work and Occupations, 27, 438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crewe, B. (2006). Male prisoners’ orientations towards women officers in an England prison. Punishment & Society, 2, 395–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doeringer, P., & Piore, M. J. (1971). Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  10. England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender. NY: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (1996). Research methods in the social sciences. New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fry, L., & Glaser, D. (1987). Gender differences in work adjustment of prison employees. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, & Rehabilitation, 12, 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodman, J. S., Fields, D. L., & Blum, T. C. (2003). Cracks in the glass ceiling: In what kind of organizations do women make it to the top? Group and Organization Management, 28, 475–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffin, M. (2007). Women as breadwinners. Women and Criminal Justice, 17, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Griffin, M. L., Armstrong, G. S., & Hepburn, J. R. (2005). Correctional officer’s perceptions of equitable treatment in the masculinized prison environment. Criminal Justice Review, 30, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grube-Farrell, B. (2002). Women, work, and occupational segregation in the uniformed services. AFFILIA, 17, 332–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hulton, M. (2003). Some take the glass escalator, some hit the glass ceiling. Work and Occupations, 30, 30–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jurik, N. C. (1985). An officer and a lady: Organizational barriers to women working as correctional officers in men’s prisons. Social Problems, 32, 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, A.-S., Devalve, M., Elizabeth, Q. D., & Johnson, W. W. (2003). Women wardens: Results from a national survey of state correctional executives. The Prison Journal, 83, 406–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Barton, S. M. (2004). The nature of work-family conflict among correctional staff: An exploratory examination. Criminal Justice Review, 29, 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lambert, E. G., Paoline, E. A., I. I. I., Hogan, N. L., & Baker, D. N. (2007). Gender similarities and differences in correctional staff work attitudes and perceptions of the work environment. Western Criminology Review, 8, 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maume, D. J., Jr. (1999). Glass ceilings and glass escalators: Occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work and Occupations, 26, 483–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McMahon, M. (1999). Women on guard: Discrimination and harassment in corrections. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morrison, A. (1987). Breaking the glass ceiling. NY: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Morton, J. (1980). A study of employment of women correctional officers in state level adult male correctional institutions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens.

  27. Rader, N. (2005). Surrendering the solidarity: Considering the relationships among women correctional officers. Women & Criminal Justice, 16, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Savicki, V., Colley, E., & Gjesvold, J. (2003). Harassment as a predictor of job burnout in correctional officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 602–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tewksbury, R., & Collins, S. C. (2006). Aggression levels among correctional officers. The Prison Journal, 86, 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). Correctional officers, April 2007. Washington, DC: Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zimmer, L. E. (1986). Women guarding men. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zimmer, L. E. (1988). Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender neutral theory. Social Problems, 35, 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Monk-Turner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, C., Monk-Turner, E. & Sumter, M. Promotional Opportunities: How Women in Corrections Perceive their Chances for Advancement at Work. Gend. Issues 27, 53–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-010-9089-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-010-9089-5

Keywords

Navigation