Skip to main content
Log in

How dark triad influences rumors spreading on social media? Mediating role of declining third-person effect

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the prevalence of rumors in today's society, the adverse impact they have on individuals' well-being has become increasingly evident, particularly with the exacerbation caused by the widespread COVID-19 pandemic. It is crucial that we address this issue urgently and effectively. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, incidents of rumor spreading on social media have posed significant threats that urgently require our response. Although the process and contextual factors of rumor transmission online are well established, little is known about individual differences in rumor sharing, especially why specific individuals are more likely to share rumors online. This online study (N = 327) examined the relationship between the Dark Triad and rumor-sharing intention and explored how this individual difference led to higher rumor-sharing intention through the decline of the Third-person Effect. Correlational analysis showed that Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy were positively correlated with rumor-sharing intentions. When we adjusted for shared variance and demographic variables between dark triad traits, Machiavellianism was the only positive predictor, and the Third-person Effect mediated this effect. These findings are discussed in terms of theoretical and practical implications, as well as directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available available in the following link: https://osf.io/45qj8/?view_only=67c4b7df515c409a84130505aded858a.

References

  • Abdoli, A. (2020). Gossip, rumors, and the COVID-19 crisis. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 14(4), e29–e30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S., & Tan, H. W. (2022). Personality and perspicacity: Role of personality traits and cognitive ability in political misinformation discernment and sharing behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 196, 111747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altay, S., Hacquin, A.-S., & Mercier, H. (2022). Why do so few people share fake news? It hurts their reputation. New Media & Society, 24(6), 1303–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, D., & Meena, K. (2021). COVID-19 as an “infodemic” in public health: Critical role of the social media. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 610623.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2020). Understanding fake news consumption: A review. Social Sciences, 9(10), 185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baughman, H. M., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. A. (2012). Relationships between bullying behaviours and the Dark Triad: A study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 571–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S., Martin, D. E., Acosta, E., Lee, M., & Shum, J. (2021). Validation of the COVID-19 transmission misinformation scale and conditional indirect negative effects on wearing a mask in public. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, C. N., Scholz, C., & Falk, E. B. (2015). Social influence and the brain: Persuasion, susceptibility to influence and retransmission. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., & Fu, L. (2022). Let’s fight the infodemic: The third-person effect process of misinformation during public health emergencies. Internet Research, 32(4), 1357–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G. M., & Ng, Y. M. M. (2016). Third-person perception of online comments: Civil ones persuade you more than me. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 736–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crysel, L. C., Crosier, B. S., & Webster, G. D. (2013). The Dark Triad and risk behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(1), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erzi, S. (2020). Dark Triad and schadenfreude: Mediating role of moral disengagement and relational aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn, FRG: Bonn University, Department of Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, Y., Sun, Q., Huang, J., Zhu, Y., & Han, X. (2015). Dirty dozen and short dark triad: A Chinese validation of two brief measures of the dark triad. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 246–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., Brooks, A. W., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2012). Anxiety, advice, and the ability to discern: Feeling anxious motivates individuals to seek and use advice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., & Mason, W. (2015). Internet research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 877–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), eaau4586.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A., Summers, J., & Mennecke, B. (2018). The effects of the dark triad on unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1), 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, L., Chen, Y., Xiong, X., Zou, X., & Lai, K. (2021). Does science literacy guarantee resistance to health rumors? The moderating effect of self-efficacy of science literacy in the relationship between science literacy and rumor belief. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., & Machan, L. (2021). It’s a conspiracy: Covid-19 conspiracies link to psychopathy, Machiavellianism and collective narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Indu, V., & Thampi, S. M. (2021). A systematic review on the influence of User personality in rumor and misinformation propagation through social networks. In Advances in Signal Processing and Intelligent Recognition Systems: 6th International Symposium, SIRS 2020, Chennai, India, October 14–17, 2020, Revised Selected Papers 6 (pp. 216–242). Singapore: Springer

  • Islam, M. S., Sarkar, T., Khan, S. H., Kamal, A.-H. M., Hasan, S. M., Kabir, A., . . . Anwar, K. S. (2020). COVID-19–related infodemic and its impact on public health: A global social media analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103(4), 1621.

  • Jabłońska, M. R., & Zajdel, R. (2020). The Dark Triad Traits and problematic Internet use: Their structure and relations. Polish Sociological Review, 212(4), 477–496.

  • Jang, S. M., & Kim, J. K. (2018). Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Strosser, G. L., Kroll, C. H., Duineveld, J. J., & Baruffi, S. A. (2015). Valuing myself over others: The Dark Triad traits and moral and social values. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K., Xiong, X., Jiang, X., Sun, M., & He, L. (2020). Who falls for rumor? Influence of personality traits on false rumor belief. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Király, O., Potenza, M. N., Stein, D. J., King, D. L., Hodgins, D. C., Saunders, J. B., ... & Demetrovics, Z. (2020). Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 100, 152180.

  • Li, K., Li, J., & Zhou, F. (2022). The Effects of Personality Traits on Online Rumor Sharing: The Mediating Role of Fear of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 6157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, P., Wang, C., Guo, F., & Luo, L. (2021). Factors affecting individual online rumor sharing behavior in the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106968.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M. T., & Hughes, S. (2015). Malicious mouths? The Dark Triad and motivations for gossip. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pabian, S., De Backer, C. J., & Vandebosch, H. (2015). Dark Triad personality traits and adolescent cyber-aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, B., Salwen, M. B., & Dupagne, M. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perloff, R. M. (1999). The third person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1(4), 353–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, C., Baek, E. C., O’Donnell, M. B., Kim, H. S., Cappella, J. N., & Falk, E. B. (2017). A neural model of valuation and information virality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(11), 2881–2886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, P., Das, A., & Pulabaigari, V. (2022). Fake spreader is narcissist; Real spreader is Machiavellian prediction of fake news diffusion using psycho-sociological facets. Expert Systems with Applications, 207, 117952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrositu, C. D., & Kim, J. (2014). Social media metrics: Third-person perceptions of health information. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., Rao, Y., Wu, L., Zhang, X., Lan, Y., & Nazir, A. (2023). Fighting False Information from Propagation Process: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(10), 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Singh, D., Virk, G. S., & Salo, J. (2020). Sharing of fake news on social media: Application of the honeycomb framework and the third-person effect hypothesis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102197.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(7), 794–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weenig, M. W., Groenenboom, A. C., & Wilke, H. A. (2001). Bad news transmission as a function of the definitiveness of consequences and the relationship between communicator and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Ngai, E. W. T., Wu, P., & Wu, C. (2022). Fake news on the internet: A literature review, synthesis and directions for future research. Internet Research, 32(5), 1662–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F., & Horning, M. (2020). Reluctant to share: How third person perceptions of fake news discourage news readers from sharing “real news” on social media. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 2056305120955173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., & Tian, Y. (2021). “Others are more vulnerable to fake news than I Am”: Third-person effect of COVID-19 fake news on social media users. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106950.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., & Zheng, Y. (2015). Sex and sexual orientation differences in empathizing-systemizing cognitive styles in China. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 267–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (grant numbers 19YJCZH073, 20YJCZH189) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (23JNQMX50, JBK22YJ54). The authors are grateful to Keyue Dai, Qi Feng, and Biao Suo for excellent research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Kaisheng Lai: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing-original draft, Supervision. Gaohong Jing: Writing-review & editing. Jingyuan Zhao: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology. Xiling Xiong: Data analysis, Writing-original draft, review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiling Xiong.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors whose names are listed below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lai, K., Jing, G., Zhao, J. et al. How dark triad influences rumors spreading on social media? Mediating role of declining third-person effect. Curr Psychol 43, 7007–7013 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04903-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04903-8

Keywords

Navigation