Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Age and sex differences in basic personality traits and interpersonal problems across young adulthood

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aims to explore the nature of age and sex differences in personality constructs throughout the young adulthood; particularly differences on personality traits and interpersonal problems, on the basis of the five-factor model and the interpersonal circumplex model. The sample consisted of 514 participants from Turkey, 257 of whom were male, and 257 were female whose ages varied from 18 to 35 (M = 24.92). To strengthen the study results, participants in the sample were individually matched on both sex and age; so that there were same number of females and males at the same age. Results indicated that men were stronger in terms of openness and hostile-dominance, whereas women were stronger in neuroticism and agreeableness traits. Regarding age differences, conscientiousness had a significant increasing pattern whereas hostile-dominance had a significant decreasing pattern with aging throughout young adulthood. Implications of the findings were discussed in line with the literature considering stability versus change debate, and gender issues in personality within a cultural and developmental context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Akyunus, M., & Gençöz, T. (2016). Psychometric properties of the inventory of interpersonal problems-Circumplex scales short form: A reliability and validity study. Dusunen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 29(1), 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of Circumplex scales for the inventory of interpersonal problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521–536.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allemand, M., Zimprich, D., & Hendricks, A. A. J. (2008). Age differences in five personality domains across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 758–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. The American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2002). Six independent factors of personality variation: A response to Saucier. European Journal of Personality, 16, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benet, V., & Waller, N. G. (1995). The ‘big seven’ model of personality description: Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 701–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birditt, K. S., Almeida, D. M., & Fingerman, K. L. (2005). Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: A daily diary study. Psychology and Aging, 20(2), 330–340.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard-Fields, F., Mienaltowski, A., & Seay, R. B. (1997). Age differences in everyday problem-solving effectiveness: Older adults select more effective strategies for interpersonal problems. Journal of Gerontology: Series B, 62, 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopik, W. J., & Kitayama, S. (2018). Personality change across the life span: Insights from a cross-cultural, longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 86(3), 508–521.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1994). Stability and change in personality from adolescence through adultood. In C. F. Havelson, G. A. Kohnstamm & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 139-150). Hillslade, HJ: Erlbaum.

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2006). Age changes in personality and their origins: Comment on Roberts, Walton, and Viechtbauer (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 26–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender Differences in Personality Traits across Cultures: Robust and Surprising Findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322–331.

  • Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Age differences in the big five across the life span: Evidence from two national samples. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 558–566.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Durrett, C., & Trull, T. J. (2005). An evaluation of evaluative personality terms: A comparison of the big seven and five-factor model in predicting psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 359–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124–129.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erden, S. (2013). Gender role and social identifications: The two major factors to shape Turkish woman. Education, 134(1), 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, N. L., Barker, E. T., & Tilton-Weaver, L. (2003). Who gets caught at maturity gap? A study of pseudomature, immature, and mature adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250244000326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gençöz, T., & Öncül, Ö. (2012). Examination of personality characteristics in Turkish sample: Development of the basic personality traits inventory. Journal of General Psychology, 139, 194–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. The American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gülgöz, S. (2002). The five-factor model and NEO-PI in Turkey. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures. Kluwer academic / plenum publishers, pp.175-196.

  • Gurtman, M. B., & Lee, D. (2009). Sex differences in interpersonal problems: A circumplex analysis. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 515–527.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Vie, M. L. (2013). How universal is the big five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 354–370.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J., & Firestone, J. M. (1998). Changes in predictors of gender role ideologies among women: A multivariate analysis. Sex Roles, 38(3–4), 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, L. M., Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Inventory of interpersonal problems manual. Texas: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • İmamoğlu, O. E. (2003). Individuation and relatedness: Not opposing, but distinct and complementary. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 367–402.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • İmamoğlu, E. O., & Aygün, Z. K. (1999). Value preferences from 1970s to 1990s: Cohort, generation and gender differences at a Turkish university. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 14, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1973). Psychological aspects of modernization in Turkey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4(2), 157–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakitapoglu-Aygün, Z., & Imamoglu, E. O. (2002). Value domains of Turkish adultsand university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanci, A. N., Işıklı, S., Aker, A. T., Gül, E. İ., Erkan, B. B., Özkol, H., & Güzel, H. Y. (2012). Personality, posttraumatic stress and trauma type: Factors contributing to posttraumatic growth and its domains in a Turkish community sample. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 3, 17303. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.17303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstabel K., Realo A., Kallasmaa T. (2002) Exploring the sources of variations in the structure of personality traits across cultures. In: McCrae R.R., Allik J. (eds) The five-factor model of personality across cultures. International and Cultural Psychology Series. Springer, Boston, MA.

  • Lippa, R. (1995). Gender-related individual differences and psychological adjustment in terms of the big five and Circumplex models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1184–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkoç, A. (2011). Big five personality traits and coping styles predict subjective well-being: A study with a Turkish sample. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 577–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Allik, J. (Eds.). (2002). International and cultural psychology series. The five-factor model of personality across cultures. New York, NY, US: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's Circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 586–595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Lima, M. P., Simões, A., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., et al. (1999). Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures. Developmental Psychology, 35, 466–477.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hřebíčková, M., Avia, M. D., Sanz, J., Sánchez-Bernardos, M. L., Kuşdil, M. E., Woodfield, R., Saunders, P. R., & Smith, P. B. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 173–186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547–556.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). Masculinity, femininity, and the Bem sex role inventory in Turkey. Sex Roles, 52(1/2), 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oztop, H., & Finkel, M. (2015). Women’s views about gender equality on the current social policy in Turkey. Journal of International Education and Leadership, 5(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1987). Effects of group selection on correlations and factor patterns in sex role research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 314–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006a). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006b). Personality traits change in adulthood: Reply to Costa and McCrae (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 29–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C., Roberts, B. W., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). A longitudinal study of personality change in young adulthood. Journal of Personality, 69(4), 617–639.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rolland, J. P. (2002). The cross-cultural generalizability of the five-factor model of personality. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures. Boston, MA: International and Cultural Psychology Series. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G. (2002). Gone too far—Or not far enough? Comments on the article by Ashton and Lee (2001). European Journal of Personality, 16, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008). Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in big five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 168–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simms, L. J. (2007). The big seven model of personality and its relevance to personality pathology. Journal of Personality, 75(1), 65–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekeli, Ş. (1995). The meaning and limits of feminist ideology in Turkey. In F. Ozbay (Ed.), Women, family and social change in Turkey (pp. 139–159). Bangkok: Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and personality: Studies in masculinity and femininity. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapnell, P. D., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Extension of the interpersonal adjective scales to include the big five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 781–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulu, İ. P., & Tezer, E. (2010). Adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism, adult attachment, and big five personality traits. The Journal of Psychology, 144(4), 327–340.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wasti, S. A., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Somer, O. (2008). Six Turkish personality factors and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(6), 665–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Y. J., De Young, C. G., & Hirsh, J. B. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the big five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(AUG), [article 178].

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1982). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior in clinical psychology. In P. C. Kendall & J. N. (Eds), handbook of research methods in clinical psychology, (pp, 183-221). New York: Wiley.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Istanbul Şehir University, Şehir Üniversitesi, Orhantepe Mahallesi, Turgut Özal Bulvarı, No: 21, 34865, Dragos, Kartal/İstanbul, Turkey

    Miray Akyunus

  2. Department of Psychology, Middle East Technical University, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Beşeri Bilimler Binası, 06800, Ankara, Turkey

    Tülin Gençöz

  3. Department of Psychology, Bahçeşehir University, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Çırağan Caddesi, Osmanpaşa Mektebi Sokak, No.4-6, 34353, Beşiktaş, İstanbul, Turkey

    B. Türküler Aka

Authors
  1. Miray Akyunus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tülin Gençöz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Türküler Aka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miray Akyunus.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The abstract of this study was published at the International Journal of Psychology, Issue 51, Supplementary 1, as a proceeding of the 31th International Conference on Psychology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akyunus, M., Gençöz, T. & Aka, B.T. Age and sex differences in basic personality traits and interpersonal problems across young adulthood. Curr Psychol 40, 2518–2527 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0165-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0165-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation