Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Indirect relations of mindful awareness with different forms of prosocial actions within college students: The mediating role of empathy

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between mindfulness and different types of pro-social behaviors through the mediating agent of empathy. Participants included 449 university students (336 female, 113 male) from various departments of three different universities in Istanbul, Turkey. The study used the Pro-social Tendencies Measure (Carlo and Randall Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31–44 2002), Mindful Attention Awareness Scale-Adolescent version (Brown et al. Psychological Assessment, 23, 1023–1033 2011) and Toronto Empathy Scale (Spreng et al. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 62–71 2009) as data collection tools. A path analysis showed that mindfulness has a significantly positive relationship with empathy, while empathy has a meaningfully negative relationship with public pro-social behaviors, and positive relations with emotional pro-social behaviors, altruistic pro-social behaviors, dire pro-social behaviors, compliant pro-social behaviors and anonymous pro-social behaviors. The proposed model explained 10% variance in public pro-social behaviors, 12% variance in emotional pro-social behaviors, 17% variance in altruistic pro-social behaviors, 7% variance in dire pro-social behaviors, 18% variance in compliant pro-social behaviors and 3% variance in anonymous pro-social behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A-Sünbül, Z. (2016). The relationship between mindfulness and resilience among adolescents: mediating role of self-compassion and difficulties in emotion regulation (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara: Middle East Technical University, Department of Educational Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in humans. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, J. J., & Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. (2007). Adolescent empathy and pro-social behavior in the multidimensional context of school culture. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168, 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouvet, C., Grignon, C., Zachariou, Z., & Lascar, P. (2015). Relationship between the development of mindfulness and improvement of depression and anxiety. Annales medico-psychologiques., 173: 1, 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., West, A. M., Loverich, T. M., & Biegel, G. M. (2011). Assessing adolescent mindfulness: Validation of an adapted mindful attention awareness scale in adolescent normative and psychiatric populations. Psychological Assessment, 23, 1023–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., Troyer, D., Switzer, G., & Speer, A. L. (1991). The altruistic personality: In what contexts is it apparent? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 450–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2001). Are all pro-social behavior equal? A socioecological developmental conception of pro-social behavior. Advances in Psychology Research, 2, 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of pro-social behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Randall, B. A., Hausmann, A., & Christiansen, S. (2003). Socio-cognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of pro-social tendencies for adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, S. H., & Langer, E. J. (2006). Mindfulness and self-acceptance. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 24(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condon, P. (2017). Mindfulness, compassion, and pro-social behavior. In J. C. Karremans & E. K. Papies (Eds.), Mindfulness in social psychology (pp. 124–138). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dameron, C. M. (2015). The effects of mindfulness techniques on empathy and emotional control (Vol. 9, pp. 1–33). Educational Specialist.

  • Dekeyser, M., Raes, F., Leijssen, M., Leysen, S., & Dewulf, D. (2008). Mindfulness skills and interpersonal behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1235–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (1983). The socialization and development of empathy and pro-social behavior. Special Report. Arizona State University.

  • Eisenberg, N., and Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In Damon W. (series ed.) and Eisenberg, N. (Vol. ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th edn.). Wiley, New York, pp. 701–778.

  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, A. P. (1987). The relation of empathy to pro-social and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fegley, S., & Hart, D. (1995). Pro-social behavior and caring in adolescence: Relations to self-understanding and social judgment. Child Development, 66, 1346–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flouri, E., & Tzavidis, N. (2008). Psychopathology and pro-social behavior in adolescents from socio-economically disadvantaged families: The role of proximal and distal adverse life events. Eur Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 498–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2011). In US: McGraw-Hill Education (Ed.), How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Germer, G. (2005). What is mindfulness? In G. Germer, R. Siegel, & P. Fulton (Eds.), Mindfulness and psychotherapy (pp. 1–27). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 20.0. Armonk. NY: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, E. (2010). Helping others helps me: Pro-social behavior as a function of identity development and self-regulation in emerging adulthood. Journal of Gustavus Undergraduate Psychology, 6. Gustavus Adolphus College.

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Mindfulness meditation for everyday life. London: Piatkus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karyadi, K. A., VanderVeen, J. D., & Cyders, M. A. (2014). A meta-analysis of the relationship between trait mindfulness and substance use behaviors. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 143, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. O., & Stevens, J. H. (1987). Socialization of pro-social behavior in children. Childhood Education, 63(3), 200–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, B. R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, F. R., Hicks,M. B., & McGue, M. (2001). Altruism and antisocial behavior: Independent tendencies, unique personality correlates, distinct etiologies. Psychological Science, 12:5, 397–402.

  • Kumru, A., Carlo, G., & Edwards, P. C. (2004). Olumlu sosyal davranışların ilişkisel, kültürel, bilişsel ve duyuşsal bazı değişkenlerle ilişkisi (Vol. 54, pp. 109–125). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi.

  • Marquez, O. G. P., Martine, P. R., & Brackett, A. M. (2006). Relating emotional intelligence to social competence and academic achievement in high school students. Psicothema, 18, 118–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, E. M. (2015). Testing the relationship between social anxiety schemas, mindfulness facets, and stressor responding. Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, Retrieved January 20, 2019, fromhttps://etd.ohiolink.edu/.

  • Peters, J. R., Smart, L. M., Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A., Geiger, P. J., Smith, G. T., & Baer, R. A. (2015). Anger rumination as a mediator of the relationship between mindfulness and aggression: The utility of a multidimensional mindfulness model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(9), 871–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridderinkhof, A., Bruin, I. E., Brummelman, E., & Bögels, M. S. (2017). Does mindfulness meditation increase empathy? An experiment. Self and Identity, 16(3), 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, W., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and pro-social behavior. Child Development, 67, 449–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spreng, R., N., Kinnon, C. M., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009). The Toronto empathy questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62–71.

  • Staub, E. (2005). The roots of goodness: The fulfillment of basic human needs and the development of caring, helping and nonagression, inclusive caring, moral courage, active bystandership, and altruism born of suffering. In G. Carlo & C. P. Edwards (Eds.), Moral motivation through the lifespan (Vol. 51, pp. 33–72). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2006). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totan, T., Doğan, T., & Sapmaz, F. (2012). The Toronto empathy questionnaire: Evaluation of psychometric properties among Turkish university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uba, I., Yaacob, N. S., & Juhari, R. (2009). The relationship between peer relations and depression among adolescents in Selangor, Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11, 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, J. A., De Winter, F. A., Verhulst, C. F., & Ormel, J. (2008). Pro-social and antisocial behavior in preadolescence: Teachers’ and parents’ perceptions of the behavior of girls and boys. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(3), 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliams, G. M. J., & Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Mindfulness: Diverse perspectives on its meaning, origins and applications. NY: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeynep Aydin Sünbül.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aydin Sünbül, Z. Indirect relations of mindful awareness with different forms of prosocial actions within college students: The mediating role of empathy. Curr Psychol 40, 126–132 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00342-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00342-6

Keywords

Navigation