Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of media usage on family functioning

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Media usage is pervasive in young children and in parents. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of media usage on family functioning. To measure media usage we used the Media Usage Questionnaire (MUQ). To measure the family functioning we used the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES IV), in which balanced scores (cohesion and flexibility) reveal a healthy functioning, and unbalanced scores reveal a dysfunctional functioning (disengagement, enmeshment, rigidity and chaos). Both instruments were administered to a sample of 80 families with children aged from 1 to 8 years. Results indicated that family functioning was balanced when both parents and young children showed low levels of digital device usage, whereas family functioning was dysfunctional when parents showed high levels of media usage and they allowed children high usage too. The results are discussed in terms of implications for the analysis of risk of altered family functioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [T.C.]

References

  • Alderfer, M. A., Fiese, B. H., Gold, J. I., Cutuli, J., Holmbeck, G. N., Goldbeck, L., et al. (2008). Evidence-based Assessment in Pediatric Psychology: FamilyMeasures. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 9, 1046–1061.

  • Atkin, A. J., Corder, K., Goodyer, I., Bamber, D., Ekelund, U., Brage, S., Dunn, V., & van Sluijsvan Sluijs, E. M. F. (2015). Perceived family functioning and friendship quality: Cross-sectional associations with physical activity and sedentary Behaviours. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(23), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0180-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballesta, J., & Cerezo, M. C. (2011). Familia y escuela ante la incorporación de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación. Educación XX1, 14(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.14.2.248

  • Beavers, R., & Hampson, R. (2000). The Beavers systems model of family functioning. The Association for Family Therapy, 22, 128–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinn-Pike, L. (2009). Technology and the family: An overview from the 1980s to the present. Marriage & Family Review, 45(6-8), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920903224459.

  • Carlson, A., & Fulton, E. (2010). Influence of limit-setting and participation in physical activity on youth screen time. Pediatrics, 126(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-3374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, J., Francisco, R., & Revals, A.P. (2015). Family Functioning and information and Communication Technologies: How do They Relate? A Literature Review. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.037.

  • Cingel, D., & Krcmar, M. (2013). Predicting media use in very young children: The role of demographic & parent attitudes. Communication Studies, 64, 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2013.770408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

  • Dai, L. T., & Wang, L. N. (2015). Review of family functioning. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinleyici, M., Carman, K. B., Ozturk, E., & Sahin-Dagli, F. (2016). Media use by children, and Parents' views on Children's media usage. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 5(2), e18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durak, Y. H. (2018). Modeling of variables related to problematic internet usage and problematic social media usage in adolescents. Current Psychology, 1–13.

  • Everri, M., Mancini, T., & Fruggeri, L. (2016). The role of rigidity in adaptive and maladaptive families assessed by FACES IV: The points of view of adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1–12.

  • Fabio, R. A. (2003). L’intervento psicoeducativo nell’ADHD, tre parole d’ordine: Multimodalità, automatizzazione e riduzione dell’entropia. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 2, 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabio, R. A. (2017). The study of automatic and controlled processes in ADHD: A reread and a new proposal. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 5(1), 2–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabio, R. A., & Antonietti, A. (2002). Come bambini e adolescenti usano il computer per imparare (pp. 11–21). XXV: Ricerche di Psicologia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabio, R. A., & Antonietti, A. (2012). Effects of hypermedia instruction on declarative, conditional and procedural knowledge in ADHD students. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 2028–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabio, R.A. Antonietti, A., & Tiezzi, P. (2003 ). Decodifica di messaggi uditivi e visivi in televisione da parte di soggetti con DDAI: attenzione diffusa o deficit nella quantità di attenzione? Psicologia dell’Educazione e della Formazione, 5, 89–107.

  • Fabio, R. A., & Caprì, T. (2015). Autobiographical memory in ADHD subtypes. Journal of Developmental and Intellectual Disability, 40(1), 26–11. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2014.983057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabio, R. A., & Caprì, T. (2017). The executive functions in a sample of Italian adults with ADHD: Attention, response inhibition and planning/organization. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 5(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/2017.5.1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabio, R. A., & Urso, M. F. (2014). The analysis of attention network in ADHD, attention problems and typically developing subjects. Life Span and Disability, 17(2), 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabio, R. A., Antonietti, A., Cena, L., & Guarnieri, A. (2004). QQUEFs e QUEFp: Strumenti di valutazione dell’“entropia” familiare dei bambini con DDAI. Imparare, 9–34.

  • Fabio, R. A., Castriciano, C., & Rondanini, A. (2015). ADHD: Auditory and visual stimuli in automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Attention Disorders, 19, 771–778, ISSN: 1087-0547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712459562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fabio, R. A., Caprì, T., Mohammadhasani, N., Gangemi, A., Gagliano, A., & Martino, G. (2018). Frequency bands in seeing and remembering: Comparing ADHD and typically developing children. Neuropsychological Trends, (24), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.7358/neur-2018-024-fabi.

  • Gentile, D., & Walsh, D. (2002). A normative study of family media habits. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godinho, J., Araújo, J., Barrio, H., & Ramos, E. (2014). Characteristics associated with media use in early adolescence. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 30(3), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00100313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes Franco Silva, F., & Sendìn Gutièrrez, J. (2014). Internet como refugio y escudo social: Usos problemáticos de la Red por jóvenes españoles. Comunicar, XXI, 43, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, J., O’Brien, A., McDonald, J., Goldman, R., Evans-Schmidt, M., Price, S., et al. (2013). Television viewing and televisions in bedrooms: Perceptions of racial/ethnic minority parents of young children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9629-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D., Green, L., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Zero to eight: Young children and their internet use. London, UK: EU Kids Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R., Ebata, A. T., & Dollahite, D. C. (1999). Family life in the information age. Family Relations, 48, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jago, R., Edwards, M. J., Urbanski, C. R., & Sebire, S. J. (2013). General and specific approaches to media parenting: A systematic review of current measures, associations with screen-viewing, and measurement implications. Childhood Obesity, 9(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2013.0031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauricella, A., Wartella, E., & Rideout, V. (2015). Young children’s screen time: The complex role of parent and child factors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant message generation and the Internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. Washington dC: PEW internet & American Life Project.

  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2008). Parental mediation and children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S., & Lagae, K. (2015). How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. London, UK: EU Kids Online Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/63378/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loriedo, C., Di Nuovo, S., & Visani, E. (2013). FACES IV: Reliability and validity in an adult Italian sample. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, G., Caprì, T., Castriciano, C., & Fabio, R. A. (2017). Automatic deficits can lead executive deficits ADHD. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 5(1), 2–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matejevica, M., Todorovic, J., & Jovanovica, D. (2014). Patterns of family functioning and dimensions of parenting style. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 431–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2017). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 89, 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12822.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. The Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0602_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Harvard University Press.

  • Mohammadhasani, N., Fabio, R. A., Fardanesh, H., & Hatami, J. (2015). The link between visual attention and memory in ADHD and normally developing students: Seeing is remembering? Reti. Saperi e Linguaggi-Italian Journal of Cognitive Science, 1(2), 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadhasani, N., Fardanesh, H., Hatami, J., Mozayani, N., & Fabio, R. A. (2018). The pedagogical agent enhances mathematics learning in ADHD students. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2299–2308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevski, E., & Siibak, A. (2016a). Mediation practices of parents and older siblings in guiding toddlers’ touchscreen technology use: An ethnographic case study. Media Education - Studi, Ricerche, Buone Pratiche, 7, 320–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevski, E., & Siibak, A. (2016b). The role of parents and parental mediation on 0-3-year olds’ digital play with smart devices: Estonian parents’ attitudes and practices. Digital Play and Technologies in the Early Years, 3, 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1161601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikken, P. (2017). Implications of low or high media use among parents for young children’s media use. Cyberpsychology: Journal of psychosocial research on cyberspace, 11(3), article 1. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-3-1

  • Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2006). Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media and Technology, 31, 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children's internet use. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 3423–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom. (2016). Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. London, UK: Ofcom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, A., Hidalgo, M.V., Rodrìguez, C. M., Jiménez, G., Jiménez, A. I., Antolín Suárez, L., & Ramos Valverde, P. (2012). Uso y riesgo de adicciones a las nuevas tecnologías entre adolescentes y jóvenes andaluces. Alicante:

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. (2011). FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37, 64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., & Gorall, D. M. (2007). FACES IV and Circumplex model, validation study. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., Gorall, D. M., & Tiesel, J.W. (2006). FACES-IV package: Administration. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations, Inc.

  • Palaiologou, I. (2016). Children under five and digital technologies: Implications for early years pedagogy. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.929876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, M. R., & Roberts, L. D. (1998). ‘Making MOOsic’: The development of personal relationships on-line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J., & Dahl, G. B. (2012). Using Natural Experiments to Study the Impact of Media on the Family. Family Relations, 61(3), 363–373.

  • Pergams, O. R. W., & Zaradic, P. A. (2006). Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. Journal of Environmental Management, 80, 387–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai, R., Chauhan, C., & Cheng, M. I. (2018). Materialistic values, brand knowledge and the mass media: Hours spent on the internet predicts materialistic values and brand knowledge. Current Psychology, 1–9.

  • Razavi, M. R. (2018). Gender differences in the effect of virtual social networks use on students’ academic performance. Current Psychology, 1–7.

  • Rideout, V. (2013). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America in 2013. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, N. V., Schenck, C., Ryan, J., Brey, F., Henderson, N., Lukelelo, N., et al. (2015). Relational aspects of family functioning and family satisfaction with a sample of families in the western cape. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 51(1), 303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sempio, O. L., Fabio, R. A., Tiezzi, P., & Cedro, C. (2016). Parental and teachers attachment in children at risk of ADHD and with ADHD. Life Span and Disability, 19(1), 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorbring, E. (2014). Parents’ concerns about their teenage Children’s internet use. Journal of Family Issues, 35(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x12467754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society. (2000). Study offers early look at how Internet is changing daily life (Press Release). Available at: http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/Press_Release/press_release.html. Accessed November 19, 2001.

  • Strasburger, V. C., & Donnerstein, E. (1999). Children, adolescents, and the media: Issues and solutions. Pediatrics, 103, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, K., Kraut, R. E., Greenfield, P. M., & Gross, E. F. (2000). The impact of home computer use on Children’s activities and development. The Future of Children, 10, 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaala, S. (2014). The nature and predictive value of mothers’ beliefs regarding infants’ and toddlers’ TV/video viewing: Applying the integrative model of behavioral prediction. Media Psychology, 17, 282–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.872995.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Valdemoros-San-Emeterio, M. Á., Sanz-Arazuri, E., & Ponce-de-León-Elizondo, A. (2018). Digital leisure and perceived family functioning in youth of upper secondary education. Comunicar, 25, 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R., & Shepherd, C. (2008). Strengthening aboriginal family functioning: What works and why? Australia: Clearing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winek, J. L. (2010). Systemic family therapy: From theory to practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. H. T., Wong, H. T., Yu, K. F., Fok, K. W., Yeung, S. M., Lam, C. H., & Ka Liu, M. (2016). Parenting approaches, family functionality, and internet addiction among Hong Kong adolescents. BMC Pediatricis, 16, 130–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, B., Nouwen, M., Vanattenhoven, J., De Ferrerre, E., & Van looy, J. (2016). A qualitative inquiry into the contextualized parental mediation practices of young children’s digital media use at home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the families who agreed to participate in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tindara Caprì.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and no funding. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

MEDIA USAGE QUESTIONNAIRE (MUQ)

Please answer the following first question: “How much time per day do you spend using these technology devices?”

Answer with this scale:

figure a

Please answer the following second question: “How much time per day do you allow your child to use these technology devices?”

Answer with this scale:

figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caprì, T., Gugliandolo, M.C., Iannizzotto, G. et al. The influence of media usage on family functioning. Curr Psychol 40, 2644–2653 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00204-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00204-1

Keywords

Navigation