Skip to main content
Log in

Factor-analytic structures in the English and Japanese versions of the Objective Measure of Ego-Identity Status (OMEIS)

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research describes an exploratory factor analysis for the purposes of factorial validation for both the English and Japanese versions of the Objective Measure of Ego-Identity Status (OMEIS)—Ideological version (Adams, Bennion, & Huh, 1989). The Japanese OMEIS is a direct translation of the English OMEIS (Ohnishi, 1998). The study reports the factor structure of the OMEIS—Ideological version in English and Japanese. A principal factor analysis (PFA) with both oblique and orthogonal solutions was performed. Alpha reliabilities for the factors are presented. The present research compares and contrasts the factor structures of OMEIS—Ideological version, derived from a U.S. sample and a Japanese sample, comprising women from late adulthood to middle age. Cultural differences between the two sample populations are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, G. R., Bennion, L., & Huh, K. (1989). Objective measure of ego identity status: A reference manual, Unpublished manuscript. Department of Family Studies, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G2W1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, G. R., Shea, J., & Fitch, S. A. (1979). Toward the development of an objective assessment of ego-identity status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 8, 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beek, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennion, L. D., & Adams, G. R. (1986). A revision of the Extended Version of the Objective Measure of Ego-identity Status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Re-search, 1, 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnam, M. A., Karno, M., Hough, R. L., Escobar, J. I., & Forsythe, A. B. (1983). The Spanish diagnostic interview schedule: reliability and comparison with clinical diagnoses. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 1189–1196.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F. M., Song, W., & Zhang, J. (1996). The Chinese MMPI-2: Research and applications in Hong Kong and the People’s Republic of China. In J. B. Butcher (Ed.) International adoptions of the MMPI-2 (pp. 137–161). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: International University Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotevant, H. D., & Adams, G. R. (1984). Development of an objective measure to assess ego identity in adolescence: Validation and replication. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13, 419–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1983). The Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwao, S. (1993). The Japanese women. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, K.-L.K. (1999). MMPI and MMPI-2 performance of the Chinese: Cross-cultural applicability. Professional Psychology: Research and practice, 30, 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcia, J. E. (1993). Epilogue. In J. E. Marcia, A. S. Waterman, D. R. Matterson, S. L. Archer, & J. L. Orlofsky (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research (pp. 273–281). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnishi, H. (1998). Women in Japan and the United States of America: Identity status and its relationship to depression (Doctoral dissertation, the University of Connecticut, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts Inter-national, 60-02A, AAG9918089.

  • Rogler, L. H. (1999). Methodological sources of cultural insensitivity in mental health research. American Psychologist, 54, 424–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper/ Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Finding something to do or someone to be: A eudaemonist perspective on identity formation. In J. Kroger (Ed.), Discussion on ego identity (pp. 147–168). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hifumi Ohnishi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohnishi, H., Ibrahim, F.A. & Owen, S.V. Factor-analytic structures in the English and Japanese versions of the Objective Measure of Ego-Identity Status (OMEIS). Curr Psychol 20, 250–259 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-001-1010-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-001-1010-7

Keywords

Navigation