Abstract
The present research examined the psychoanalytic theory of mate selection (Freud, 1927) which proposes that people choose romantic partners similar to their oppositesex parents (Epstein & Guttman, 1984). This phenomenon was addressed as both an actual phenomenon that guides partner choice and as a perceived phenomenon regarding people's conceptualizations of their parents and partners. Participants were asked to describe their parents, significant others, and ideal significant others in terms of several personality characteristics. Also, actual parents and partners of subjects described themselves. For four of eight personality variables, subjects' opposite-sex parents scored similarly to their partners. Also, subjects perceived their significant others as similar to their parents across all variables. Relationship satisfaction was significantly related to the degree to which participants perceive similarity between their parents and partners. Implications for understanding how people's parents influence both actual mate selection and romantic partner perception are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aron, R. (1974). Relationships with opposite-sexed parents and mate choice. Human Relations, 27, 17–24.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Buss, D. M. (1994). The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. New York: BasicBooks.
Collins, N. L. & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644–663.
Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Daly, M. & Wilson, M. (1990). Is parent-offspring conflict sex-linked? Freudian and Darwinian models. Journal of Personality, 58(1), 163–189.
Epstein, E. & Guttman, R. (1984). Mate selection in man: Evidence, theory, and outcome. Social Biology, 31,243–278.
Feeney, J. A. & Noller, P. (1990). Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 281–291.
Freud, S. (1927). Some psychological consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), Standard edition, Vol. 8 (pp. 133–142). London: Hogarth Press.
Hazan, C. & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.
Hotelling, H. (1940). The selection of variátes for use in prediction with some comments on the general problem of nuisance parameters. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11,271–283.
Jedlicka, D. (1980). A test of the psychoanalytic theory of mate selection. Journal of Social Psychology, 112,295–299.
Jedlicka, D. (1984). Indirect parental influence on mate choice: A test of the psychoanalytic theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46: 65–70.
Kent, D. P. (1951). Subjective factors in mate selection: An exploratory study. Sociology and Social Research, 35, 391–398.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G. & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.
Rothbard, J. C. & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Continuity of attachment across the lifespan (pp. 31–71). In M. B. Sperling & W. H. Berman (Eds.), Attachment in Adults: Clinical and Developmental Perspectives. New York: Guilford Press.
Strauss, A. (1946). The influence of parent-images upon marital choice. American Sociological Review, 11,554–559.
Wilson, G. D. & Barrett, P. T. (1987). Parental characteristics and partner choice: Some evidence for Oedipal imprinting. Journal of Biosocial Science, 19, 157–161.
Winch, R. F. (1950). Some data bearing on the Oedipus complex. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45,481–489.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author expresses his gratitude to the institutions of the University of New Hampshire and Western Oregon University for supporting this research. Additionally, the author expresses his sincere appreciation for the help of the following individuals who all contributed to this research in some way: Rebecca Warner, Kathleen Bauman, Nicole (Nikki) Stoecker, Sara Elizabeth Kay Hubbard, Tracy Beckel, Becky Briggs, Jennifer Palmacci, Cortney Ravenscroft, Allison Schermerhorn, Gregory Tetrault, Vicki Banyard, Kathleen McCartney, Jack Lannamann, and Sally Ward.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geher, G. Perceived and actual characteristics of parents and partners: A test of a freudian model of mate selection. Curr Psychol 19, 194–214 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-000-1015-7
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-000-1015-7