Skip to main content
Log in

Towards an Understanding the Outcomes of Housing Privatisation in South Africa

  • Published:
Urban Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Housing privatisation is commonly understood in political economic terms. The proponents of privatisation argue that the provision of ownership enables households to have security of tenure, which in turn leads to increased housing investment, the development of a secondary housing market and a source of income for the local authority by means of land tax. On the other hand, critics of housing privatisation suggest that such processes lead to landlordism and an increased dependence on mortgage finance. This paper uses historical methodology to trace the historical lack of secure tenure for urban black South Africans. The data consists of 395 structured questionnaires conducted in the case study area of Mangaung, the former black township of Bloemfontein. The results suggest that housing privatisation processes in South Africa cannot be viewed only through a political economic lens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bond, P. (2000). 1980s township housing boom. In P. Bond (Ed.), Cities of gold. Townships of Coal: Africa World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G., & Morgan, J. (1998). Low-cost housing onwership initiatives in the UK. Housing Studies, 13(4), 567–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, R. (1998). Mortgage indebtness in England: “an epidemiology”. Housing Studies, 13(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, P. (2013). Collateral damage? Transforming subprime slum dwellers into homeowners. Housing Studies. doi:10.1080/02673037.2013.759543

  • Charlton, S., & Kihato, C. (2006). Reaching the poor? An analysis of the influences on the evolution of South Africa’s housing programme. In U. Pillay, R. Tomlinson, & J. Du Toit (Eds.), Democracy and delivery. Urban policy in South Africa. Cape Town: HSRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital. Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. (1999). A home is forever? Residential mobility and home ownership in self-help settlements. Environment and Planning A, 31, 1073–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. (2002). On the mystery of capital and the myths of Hernando De Soto: what difference does legal title make? International Development Planning Review, 24(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A., Mabin, A., & McCarthy, M. (1997). Low-income rental housing: are South African cities different? Environment & Urbanisation, 9(1), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horita, Y. (2000). Privatisation and council housing in England: a study on measures of privatisation. 18A, 65–78, Mem Grad Sch Sci Technol Kobe University.

  • Huchzermeyer, M. (2004). Unlawful occupation: informal settlements and urban policy in South Africa and Brazil. Trenton: African World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karn, V. (1985). Home ownership in the inner city: Salvation or despair. Gower: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krige, S. (1991). Bloemfontein. In A. Lemon (Ed.), Homes apart. South Africa’s segregated cities (pp. 104–119). Cape Town: David Philip.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon, A. (1991). The apartheid city. In A. Lemon (Ed.), Homes apart. South Africa’s segregated cities (pp. 1–25). Cape Town: David Philip.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linneman, P., & Megbolugbe, I. (1994). Privatisation and housing policy. Urban Studies, 635–651.

  • Mabin, A. (1991). The dynamics of urbanisation since 1960. In M. Swilling, R. Humphries, & K. Shubane (Eds.), Apartheid city in transition (pp. 33–47). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabin, A., & Parnell, S. (1983). Recommodification of working-class home ownership: new directions for South African cities. South African Geographical Journal, 65(2), 148–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, P., & Mullins, D. (2002). Local authority housing stock transfers in the UK: from local initiative to national policy. Housing Studies, 17(4), 645–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marais, L., & Krige, S. (1997). The upgrading of Freedom Square informal settlement in Bloemfontein: lessons for future low-income housing. Urban Forum, 8(2), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marais, L., & Ntema, J. (2013). The upgrading of an informal settlement in South Africa: twenty years onwards. Habitat International, 39, 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayekiso, M. (1996). Township politics. Civic struggles for a New South Africa. Monthly Review Press. New York.

  • Merret, S., & Gray, F. (1982). Owner occupation in Britain. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P. (1981). A history of black housing in South Africa. Johannesburg: South Africa Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, M. (2007). Evaluating policy towards increasing owner occupation. Housing Studies, 22(2), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C., & Muir, J. (2002). After housing policy: housing and the UK general election 2001. Housing Studies, 17(1), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royston, L. (2006). Barking dogs and building bridges: a contribution to making sense of de Soto’s ideas in the South African context. In M. Huchzermeyer & A. Kamram (Eds.), Informal settlements: a perpetual challenge? (pp. 165–179). Cape Town: UCT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. (1990). A nation of home owners. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, P., & Booysen, J. (1977). Urbanization in the homelands—a new dimension in the urbanisation of the black population of South Africa? Pretoria: Institute for Plural Societies, University of Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipple, G. (2000). Extending themselves: user-initiated transformations of government-built housing in developing countries. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, M. (1998). South Africa’s new housing policy: an assessment of the first two years, 1994–1996. International Journal for Urban and Regional Research, 22(1), 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, M. (2006). From ‘quantity’ to ‘quality’: restructuring South Africa’s housing policy ten years after. International Development Planning Review, 28(1), 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, R., & Krige, S. (1997). Botshabelo: coping with the consequences of urban apartheid. International Journal for Urban and Regional Research, 21(4), 691–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P., Huerta, E., Grajeda, E., & Velazguez, C. (2011). Self-help housing policies for second generation inheritance and succession of “The House that Mum & Dad Built”. Habitat International, 35, 467–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, J. (1989). Black housing in South Africa. Paper delivered at the World Housing Conference, Pretoria.

  • Wolfson, T. (1991). Access to urban land. In M. Swilling, R. Humphries, & K. Shubane (Eds.), Apartheid city in transition (pp. 231–257). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, W. (1993). Housing. Enabling markets to work. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lochner Marais.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marais, L., Sefika, M., Ntema, J. et al. Towards an Understanding the Outcomes of Housing Privatisation in South Africa. Urban Forum 25, 57–68 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-013-9206-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-013-9206-0

Keywords

Navigation