Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Customers in Interactive Co-Creation Practices: The Italian Scenario

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge, Technology & Policy

Abstract

Co-production, or co-creation, is becoming the cornerstone of marketing and design practices and a sort of managerial mantra that is rapidly gaining momentum both at professional and academic level. Despite a growing interest for this topic, there seems to be a lack of researches investigating the level of interest and participation of customers in co-creation activities and the drivers and motivations that might trigger co-production. This paper presents the results of a research run by Politcnico di Milano School of Management in collaboration with AC Nielsen, Nielsen Online and Connexia in 2007 among Italian consumers to determine the size and characteristics of the co-creation phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. By accessing Nielsen Homescan® to run this investigation authors had the chance to access to a multi-outlet panel that captures all consumer package goods purchase information, as well as non-UPC coded random weight perishable products. Over the past 10 years, the Homescan consumer panel has emerged as one of the most performing consumer purchasing panel in the world. Its proven success and the value it brings to marketers has led to the development of ACNielsen Worldwide Consumer Panel Services, now providing key consumer insights in 27 countries, based on consumer purchase information from over 260,000 households globally. A key advantage of Homescan is that it provides insights into buying behaviour across every type of purchase channel. Using in-home bar code scanners, Nielsen Homescan provides our clients with valuable insights into consumer shopping behaviour not available from any other source. The Nielsen Homescan panel is demographically balanced to represent the household population. It has long proven itself the definitive source for understanding consumer purchase behaviour and shopping patterns for any segment of the population across all outlet types.

References

  • Allen, C. (1993), “Reciprocal evolution as a strategy for integratine basic research, design and studies of work practice”. In Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (eds.), Participatoty design: Principles and Practices. Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battarbee, K. (2003), “Co-experience- the Social User Experience”, Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction CHI’03, New York.

  • Bendapudi, N.P., Leone, R.P. (2003), “Psychological Implications of Customer Participation in Co-Production,” Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 14–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L.A. (1997), “Customer Voluntary Performance: Customers as Partners in Service Delivery,” Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 383–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, M. J., Booms, B.H. and Mohr, L.A. (1994), “Critical Service Encounters: The Employee's Viewpoint,” Journal of Marketing, 58(10), 95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaretto, A., Noci, G., Pini, F.M. (2007), Marketing Reloaded, Il Sole 24 Ore, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S. and Buur, J. (2002), “The design collaboratorium: a place for usability design,” ACM Transactions on Human Computer Interaction, 9(2), 125–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botero, A., Battarbee, K., Mattelmaki, T. and Rizzo, F. (2008), “Designed for Co-Design”. Proceedings of PDC 08, ACM, Oct. 1–4, Bloomington.

  • Boulding, William (1993), “A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 30(2), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, J. (1998), “Experience Based Design: Towards a Sciente of Artful Business Innovation,” Design Management Journal, Fall, 10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Cermak, D.S.P., File, K.M. (1994), “Customer Participation in Service Specification and Delivery,” Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(2), 90–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. (1990), “How to Improve Perceived Service Quality by Improving Customer Participation,” in Developments in Marketing Science, B.J. Dunlap, ed. Academy of Marketing Science, Cullowhee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlizzi, J. and Ford, S. (2000), “The building blocks of experience: An early framework for interaction designers”. Proceedings of DIS 2000, ACM, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (2002), Leading the Revolution, Harvard Business School, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honebein, P.C., Cammarano, R.F. (2006), “Customers at Work,” Marketing Management, 15(8), 797–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen, I., Battarbee, K. and Mattelmaki, T. (2003). Empathic Design, IT Press, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann Universal (2008). Wave 3, working paper, McCann Universal, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, K. And Rollins, N. (2008). The Open Brand, AIGA New Riders, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pini, F.M., Noci, G., Boaretto, A. (2008). “Marketing della co-produzione”, in Sviluppo e Organizzazione, n. 1.

  • Prahalad, C. K., Ramaswamy, V. (2000), “Co-Opting Customer Competence,” Harvard Business Review, 78(1)

  • Plymire, J. (1991), “Complaints as Opportunities,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 8, 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. and Ivens, J. (2002). Building Great Customer Experiences. Macmillan. New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. and Wheeler, J. (2002). Managing the Customer Experience. Prentice Hall Financial Times. Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuten, T.L: (2008). Advertising 2.0. Pragear. Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1988), The Sources of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wind, J., Rangaswamy, A. (2001), “Customerization: The Next Revolution in Mass Customization,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(1), 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V., Berry, L. and A. Parasuraman (1996), “The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Maria Pini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pini, F.M. The Role of Customers in Interactive Co-Creation Practices: The Italian Scenario. Know Techn Pol 22, 61–69 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-009-9068-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-009-9068-x

Keywords

Navigation