Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing motivations of individual programmers and firms to take part in the open source movement: From community to business

  • Published:
Knowledge, Technology & Policy

Abstract

The first urgent question for any scholar willing to study the Open Source (OS) movement has been clearly put by Glass (1999, 104): I don’t know who these crazy people are who want to write, read and even revise all that code without being paid anything for it at all. A growing body of economic literature has been addressing the motivations at the basis of the participation in the OS movement since when the new paradigm has become successful and triggered the entrance on the market of firms offering Open Source based products and services (Open Source firms). However, most of the empirical analyses focus on individual developers and neglect companies that adopt Open Source business models. This paper contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on the incentives of the firms that engage in OS activities. Findings on firms’ motivations are compared

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R. A., Lucero M. A. (1994) Employee benefit: a growing source of psychological contract violation. Human Resource Management, 33, 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki A., Hayashi K., Kishida A., Nakakoji K., Nishinaka Y., Reeves B., Takashima A., Yamamoto Y. (2001) A case study of the evolution of Jun: an object oriented Open Source 3D multimedia library. Proceeding of the 23rd ICSE Conference Toronto.

  • Bates J., Di Bona C., Lakhani K., Wolf B. (2002) The Boston Consulting Group hacker survey.

  • Bergquist, M., Ljungberg (2001) The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in Open Source communities. Information Systems Journal, 11(4), 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezroukov N. (1999) Open Source software development as a special type of academic research (critique of the vulgar raymondism). http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue4_10/bezroukov/, accessed on April 9th 2003.

  • Bitzer, J., Wolfram S., Schroder P.H.J. (2004). Intrinsic motivation in open source software development. MIT Working Paper, http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/bitzerschrettlschroder.pdf, accessed on January 23rd 2005.

  • Bonaccorsi A., Giannangeli S., Rossi C. (2006) Entry strategies under competitive standards. Hybrid business models in the Open Source software industry. Management Science, forthcoming.

  • Bonaccorsi A., Rossi C. (2003) Why Open Source can succeed. Research Policy 32(7), 1243–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi A., Rossi C. (2004) Altruistic individuals, selfish firms? The structure of motivation in Open Source software. First Monday, Peer Reviewed Journal on the Internet, 9(1).

  • Coleman, J. S. (1958). Relational analysis: the study of social organization with survey methods. Human Organization, 17, 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalle J.M., David P.A. (2003) The allocation of software development resources in ‘open source’ production mode. MIT Working Paper.

  • David K., Pfaff B. (1998) Society and Open Source: why Open Source software is better for society than closed source software. http://www.msu.edu/user/pfaffben/writings/anp/oss-is-better.html, accessed on 21st April 2003.

  • David P. (1991) Reputation and agency in the historical emergence of the institutions of Open Science. Stanford University, CA, March, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egon F., Jungwirth C. (2002) Reconciling investors and donators. The governance structure of Open Source. MIT Working Paper, http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/jungwirth.pdf, accessed on May 12th 2003.

  • Feller J., Fitzgerald B. (2002) Understanding Open Source Software Development. Addison Wesley, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink M. (2003) The business and economics of Linux and Open Source. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke N., von Hippel E. (2003) Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software. Forthcoming Research Policy Special Issue on Open Source Software Development.

  • Friedman H.H., Herskovitz P. J., Pollack S. (1993) The biasing effects of scale-checking styles on response to a Likert scale. Proceedings of survey research methods section, American Statistical Association, http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/y1993.html, accessed on 9 May 2003.

  • Ghosh R., Glott R., Krieger B., Robles G. (2002) Survey of Developers. Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study, FLOSS, Final Report, International Institute of Infonomics, Berlecom Research GmbH.

  • Glass R. (1999) Of Open Source, Linux and Hype, IEEE Software 16(1), 126–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green L. G. (2000). Economics of Open Source Software. http://badtux.org/home/eric/editorial/economics.php, accessed on April 19th 2003.

  • Hars A., Ou S. (2002) Working for free? Motivations for participating in Open Source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6, 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hars A., Ou S. (2002) Working for Free? Motivations of participating in Open Source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6, 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins R.E. (2002) The economics of the Open Source Software for a competitive firm. MIT Working Paper.

  • Hecker F. (2000) Setting up shop: the business of Open-Source software. http://www.hecker.org/writings/setting-up-shop.html, accessed on March 26th 2003.

  • Hertel G., Niedner S., Herman S. (2003) Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet based survey. Research Policy, 32(7).

  • http://www.osdn.com/bcg/, accessed on April 9th 2003.

  • Kollock P. (1999) The economics of on line cooperation: gift and public goods in cyberspace. In Smith, Marc and Kollock (ed.) Communities in cyberspace 220–246. Routledge, London.

  • Kratz M. S., Robinson S.L., Rousseau D. M. (1994) Changing obligations and the psychological contract: a longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy S. (2005) On the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of Free/Libre/Open Source (FLOSS) Developers. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, special issue on Free, libre an open source software communities, forthcoming.

  • Kuster B., Osterloh M., Rota S. (2002) Trust and commerce in Open Source — a contradiction? MIT Working Paper.

  • Lakhani K., Spaeth S., von Krogh G. (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study. Forthcoming research policy special issue on open source software development.

  • Lakhani K., von Hippel E. (2003). How Open Source software works: “free user-to-user assistance”. Forthcoming Research Policy Special Issue on Open Source Software Development.

  • Lakhani, K., Wolf B. (2003) Why hackers do what they do: understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. MIT Working Paper, http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/lakhaniwolf.pdf, accessed on January 12th 2005.

  • Lerner J. (2002) Incentives and Open Source software. http://cip.umd.edu/lerner.htm, accessed on April 25th 2003.

  • Lerner J., Tirole J. (2001) The Open Source movement: key research questions. European Economic Review 45, 819–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner J., Tirole J. (2002a) The Scope of Open Source Licensing. MIT Working Paper.

  • Lerner J., Tirole J. (2002b) Some simple economics of the Open Source. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2 (L), 197–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levison H., Price C., Munden K., Mandl H., Solley C. (1962) Men, management and mental health. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebovitch E. (1999) The Business Case for Linux. IEEE Software 16(1), 40–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y. (2005) Hybrid innovation: the dynamics of collaboration between the FLSOS community and corporations. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, special issue on Free, libre and open source software communities, forthcoming.

  • Mauss M. (1959) The Gift. The form and the reason for exchange in archaic societies. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean Parks J., Schmedemann D. A. (1994) When promises become contracts: implied contract and handbook provisions on job security. Human Resource Management, 33, 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe K. R. (1996) The heart of altruism. Princeton University Press Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison E.W., Robinson S. L. (1997) When employees feel betray: a model of how psychological contract violation develops. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Advisory Council on Innovation Open Software Working Group (2002) Open Software and Open Standards in South Africa. A critical issue for addressing the Digital Divide. http://www.naci.org.za/docs/opensource.pdf, accessed on 6th May 2003.

  • O’Mahony S. (2003) Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy, 32(7), 1179–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh M., Rota s., Von Wartburg M. (2002) Open source — new rules in software development. http://www.unizh.ch/ifbf/orga/downloads/opensourceaom.pdf, accessed on April 25th 2003.

  • Pavlicek R. (1999) Already a contender. http://archive.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/01/10/29/011029opsource.xml, accessed on April 25th 2003.

  • Pavlicek R. (2000) Keys to Effective Linux Advocacy Within Your Organization. Compaq Enterprise Technical Symposium, October 6th 2000.

  • Raymond E. (2001a) The cathedral & the Bazaar. Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopolous, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, E. S. (2001b) Homesteading the Noosphere. In Raymond E.S., The Cathedral and the Bazaar: musing Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary. O’Really, Sebastapol, CA, 19–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi C., Bonaccorsi A. (2005) Intrinsic motivations and profit-oriented firms in Open Source software. Do firms practise what they preach?. In Bitzer and Schröder (eds.) The economics of Open Source software development analyzing motivation, organization, innovation and competition in the Open Source Software revolution. Elsevier Science, forthcoming.

  • Rousseau D. M. (1989) Psychological and implied contracts in organisations. Employee Responsibility and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau D., McLean Parks J. (1993) The contracts of individuals and organizations. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 15, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Kampmeier, C., Spahlinger, P. (1998) Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 646–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stallman R. (1984) The GNU Manifesto. http://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.html, accessed on March 26th 2003.

  • Stone M. (1998) Science of the New Renaissance. In Di Bona C., Ockman S., Stone M., Eds. (1999). Opensources. Voci dalla Rivoluzione Open Source. Apogeo, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torvalds L., Diamond D., (2002) Just for fun: The Story of an accidental revolutionary. Harper Collins Publishers, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman E. (1998) The Dumbing Down of Programming. http://archive.salon.com/21st/feature/1998/05/cov_12feature.html, accessed on April 19th 2003.

  • Von Hippel (2002) Open source projects as horizontal innovation networks — by and for users. SSRN Working paper.

  • Wichmann T. (2002a) Firms’ Open Source activities: motivations and policy implications. Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study, FLOSS Final Report, International Institute of Infonomics, Berlecom Research GmbH.

  • Wichmann T. (2002b) Use of Open Source Software in Firms and Public Institutions. Evidence from Germany, Sweden and UK. Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study, FLOSS Final Report, International Institute of Infonomics, Berlecom Research GmbH.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the School of Engineering, University of Pisa, Italy

    Andrea Bonaccorsi (Full Professor of Economics and Management)

  2. the Department of Management, Economics, and Industrial Engineering of Politecnico di Milano, Italy

    Cristina Rossi (post doc researcher in economics)

Authors
  1. Andrea Bonaccorsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cristina Rossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

His recent research interests are in the economics of science, industrial dynamics in high technology industries, and theory and empirics of diffusion of technologies with network externality. He has authored or edited five books and written 80 papers in international journals and conferences. His studies have been published in several top refereed journals. He is member elected of the Executive Committee of the PRIME (Policies for Research and Innovation in the Move towards the European Research Area) Network of Excellence (6th Framework Programme) and has previously coordinated or contributed actively to several EU research projects (within TACIS-ACE, DG III, DG XII and DG XXII).

She got her Ph.D. in economics and management of innovation at Sant’ Anna School in November 2003. At present, she collaborates also with the Department of Electrical Systems and Automation of the University of Pisa. Her research interests deal with the economics of open source software (OSS) and focus on profit-oriented firms that offer open source-based products and services (open source firms). Under a theoretical point of view, she is now investigating the motivations that lead individuals to provide a continuous stream of contributions to collective goods that are immaterial in their nature (e.g., participation in OSS projects, participation in the scientific community). with the results of the surveys on individual programmers aiming at analyzing the role played by different classes of incentives (social, economic and technological) in determining the involvement in the movement of different typologies of agents (Individual vs. organizations).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonaccorsi, A., Rossi, C. Comparing motivations of individual programmers and firms to take part in the open source movement: From community to business. Know Techn Pol 18, 40–64 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-006-1003-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-006-1003-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation