Abstract
In this paper, we draw on Charles Sanders Pierce’s typology of semiotic signs and suggest that the three types of signs (icon, index, and symbol) enhance working memory and inhibition through three different mechanisms: icons support the process of embodiment; indexes strengthen focus of attention; symbols enhance the process of generalization. Mathematical icons enhance the process of embodying mathematical entities. They help the individual hold the information associated with a mathematical entity in the visual working memory and suppress information that is irrelevant to the task. Indexes strengthen focus of attention by directly referring to the place of mathematical entities and disregarding contextually-irrelevant stimuli. Symbols enhance the process of generalization by suppressing low-level information and reducing the load on working memory. Since cognitive flexibility as the third component of executive functions builds on working memory and inhibition, it can be hypothesized that mathematical signs contribute to this component as well.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Anderson, M., Sáenz-Ludlow, A., Zellweger, S., & Cifarelli, V. (2003). Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing. Ottawa: Legas.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8(4), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.485
Bascandziev, I., Powell, L. J., Harris, P. L., & Carey, S. (2016). A role for executive functions in explanatory understanding of the physical world. Cognitive Development, 39, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.04.001
Basilio, M., & Rodríguez, C. (2017). How toddlers think with their hands: Social and private gestures as evidence of cognitive self-regulation in guided play with objects. Early Child Development and Care, 187(12), 12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1202944
Brocki, K. C., & Bohlin, G. (2004). Executive functions in children aged 6 to 13: A dimensional and developmental study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26(2), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2602_3
Burgess, P. W., & Simons, J. S. (2005). Theories of frontal lobe executive function: Clinical applications. In P. W. Halligan, & D. T. Wade (Eds.), Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive deficits (pp. 211–231). New York: Oxford University Press.
Colapietro, V. M. (1993). Glossary of semiotics. New York, NY: Paragon House.
Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001
Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2037–2078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Eco, U. (1986). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Espy, K. A. (2004). Using developmental, cognitive, and neuroscience approaches to understand executive control in young children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26(1), 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2601_1
Fleer, M., Veresov, N., & Walker, S. (2019). Playworlds and executive functions in children: Theorising with the cultural-historical analytical lenses. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09495-2
Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31
Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12(6), 516–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00395
Hughes, C., & Graham, A. (2002). Measuring executive functions in childhood: Problems and solutions? Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 7(3), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-3588.00024
Khatin-Zadeh, O., & Yazdani-Fazlabadi, B. (2023). Two mechanisms for understanding mathematical concepts in terms of fictive motions. Mind Brain and Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12358
Khatin-Zadeh, O., Eskandari, Z., & Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2022a). Gestures enhance executive functions for the understating of mathematical concepts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09694-4
Khatin-Zadeh, O., Eskandari, Z., Yazdani-Fazlabadi, B., & Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2022b). Four functions of gesture in promoting thought processes. Psychological Studies, 67(4), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-022-00680-9
Khatin-Zadeh, O., Farina, M., Yazdani-Fazlabadi, B., Hu, J., Trumpower, D., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., & Farsani, F. (2022c). The roles of gestural and symbolic schematizations in inhibition as a component of executive functions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09742-z
Lehto, J. E., Juujarvi, P., Kooistra, L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2003). Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151003321164627
Martin, J., & Failows, L. (2010). Executive function: Theoretical concerns. In B. Sokol, U. Muller, J. Carpendale, A. Young, & G. Iarocci (Eds.), Self-and social-regulation: Exploring the relations between social interaction, social understanding, and the development of executive functions (pp. 35–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C., & Del Olmo, M. J. (2015). The rhythmic, sonorous and melodic components of adult-child-object interactions between 2 and 6 months old. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 737–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9298-2
Morsella, E., & Krauss, R. M. (2004). The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. The American Journal of Psychology, 117(3), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149008
Perner, J., Lang, B., & Kloo, D. (2002). Theory of mind and self-control: More than a common problem of inhibition. Child Development, 73(3), 752–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00436
Ping, R. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects. Cognitive Science, 34(4), 602–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01102.x
Posner, M. I., & DiGirolamo, G. J. (1998). Executive attention: Conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain (p. 401423). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Radford, L. (2013). On semiotics and education. Éducation & Didactique, 7(1), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.1668
Radford, L., Schubring, G., & Seeger, F. (2008). Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Radford, L., Schubring, G., & Seeger, F. (2011). Signifying and meaning-making in mathematics thinking, teaching and learning: Semiotic perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 149–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9322-5
Rodríguez, C., & Moreno-Llanos, I. (2020). A pragmatic turn in the study of early executive functions by object use and gestures. A case study from 8 to 17 months of age at a nursery school. Integrative psychological and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09578-5
Rodríguez, C., & Palacios, P. (2007). Do private gestures have a self-regulatory function? A case study. Infant Behavior & Development, 30(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.02.010
Rodríguez, C., Estrada, L., Moreno-Llanos, I., & de los Reyes, J. L. (2017). Executive functions and educational actions in an infant school: Private uses and gestures at the end of the first year. Funciones ejecutivas y acción educativa en la escuela infantil: Usos y gestos privados al final del primer año. Estudios de Psicología, 38(2), 385–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2017.1305061
Röthlisberger, M., Neuenschwander, R., Cimeli, P., Michel, E., & Roebers, C. M. (2012). Improving executive functions in 5- and 6-year-olds: Evaluation of a small group intervention in prekindergarten and kindergarten children. Infant and Child Development, 21(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.752
Sáenz –Ludlow, A., & Presmeg, N. (2006). Semiotic perspectives on learning mathematics and communicating mathematically. Educational Studies Mathematics, 61(1–2), 1–10 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9001-5
Sáenz-Ludlow, A., & Kadunz, G. (2016). Semiotics as a tool for learning mathematics: How to describe the construction, visualisation, and communication of mathematics concepts. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, 283(5408), 1657–1661. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5408.1657
Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
Wagner, S. M., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.002
Wesp, R., Hesse, J., Keutmann, D., & Wheaton, K. (2001). Gestures maintain spatial imagery. American Journal of Psychology, 114(4), 591–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423612
Zelazo, P. D., & Müller, U. (2010). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 574–602). Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
Funding
This study received no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
O.K-Z wrote the first draft of the manuscript. J.H commented on the first draft and help in the revising the final draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khatin-Zadeh, O., Hu, J. The role of Mathematical Semiotic Signs in Enhancing Working Memory and Inhibition as the Components of Executive Functions. Integr. psych. behav. 58, 138–148 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09776-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09776-x