Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to contribute to the reflection on a potential integrative framework for the psychological sciences based on the target paper in this special issue “Psychology: A Giant with Feet of Clay” by Zagaria, Andò & Zennaro. The paper is organized in three parts. In the first part we will discuss whether introductory textbooks provide a solid and reasonable basis for an analysis of the quality of conceptualization of key concepts in the psychology as well as whether the epistemological analysis could provide arguments for a conclusion that the psychology is a “soft(er)” science. In the second part, we will formulate our reasons why we share with Zagaria, Andò & Zennaro the conclusion that the evolutionary psychology might play a significant role in our quest for the integrative framework, but also why we are not convinced that evolutionary psychology can be integrative enough. In the third part, we are going to formulate an alternative starting point for exploration of for an integrative framework for psychological sciences and their practical applications supporting individuals and communities in their quest for a meaningful and productive existence and navigation of their future lives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Baucal, A., Pavlović Babić, D., & Jošić, S. (2018). Dialogical PISA: correct answers are all alike, every incorrect answer is incorrect in its own way. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 467–487.
Baucal, A., Gillespie, A., Krstić, K., & Zittoun, T. (2020). Reproducibility in psychology: theoretical distinction of different types of replications. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54, 152–157.
Bhatia, V. (2002/2013). A generic view of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 21–39). New York: Routledge.
de Carvalho, E., & Skipper, Y. (2019). “We’re not just sat at home in our pyjamas!”: a thematic analysis of the social lives of home educated adolescents in the UK. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34, 501–516.
Eisenstein, J. (2019). Introduction to Natural Language Processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Flowerdew, J. (2002/2013). Introduction: Approaches to the analysis of academic discourse in english. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Dscourse (pp. 1–18). New York: Routledge.
Grossen, M., & Muller Mirza, N. (2020). Talking about cultural diversity at school: dialogical tensions and obstacles to secondarisation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35, 243–264.
Guevara, I., Moreno-Llanos, I., & Rodríguez, C. (2020). The emergence of gestures in the first year of life in the Infant School classroom. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35, 265–288.
Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 3–26.
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2008). Speech and Language Processing (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Love, A. (1991). Process and product in geology: an investigation of some discourse features of two introductory textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 89–109.
Love, A. (1993). Lexico-grammatical features of geology textbooks: process and product revisited. English for Specific Purposes,12, 197–218.
Love, A. (2002/2013). Introductory concepts and ‘cutting edge’ theories: Can the genre of the textbook accommodate both? In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 76–91). New York: Routledge.
Myers, G. (1992). Textbooks and the sociology of scientific knowledge. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 3–17.
Muller Mirza, N., Baucal, A., Perret Clermont, A. N., & Marro, P. (2003). Nice designed experiment goes to the local community. Cahiers de Psychologie, 38, 17–28.
Parodi, G. (2010). The rhetorical organization of the Textbook genre across disciplines: a ‘colonyin-loops’? Discourse Studies, 12, 195–222.
Selleri, P., & Carugati, F. (2018). Errare humanum est! A socio-psychological approach to a “Climbing Mount Fuji” PISA question. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 489–504.
Slot, E., Akkerman, S., & Wubbels, T. (2019). Adolescents’interest experience in daily life in andacross family and peer contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34, 25–43.
Swales, J. M. (1995). The Role of the Textbook Writing Research. English for Specific Purposes, 14, 3–18.
Vygotsky, L. (1934/2012). Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wertsch, J. (1993). Voices of the Mind: Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zagaria, A., Andò, A., & Zennaro, A. (in press). Psychology: a giant with feet of clay. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baucal, A., Krstić, K. Searching for an Integrative Theoretical Framework for Psychology: Evolutionary Psychology is Needed, But Not Sufficient. Integr. psych. behav. 54, 579–588 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09551-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09551-2