Abstract
The concept of defense mechanism is interwoven with psychoanalytic theories of anxiety and psychic conflict. From its first formulation in 1894, its usefulness resides in the degree to which it helps to explain otherwise mysterious phenomena. Statistical approaches to the study of defense mechanisms, which have significantly increased in popularity in the past three decades, test isolated assumptions without reflection on how these are integrated into psychoanalytic theory, nor on what should be regarded as psychoanalytic data. Consequently, their results and their models have not provided useful insights into psychoanalytic theory. This paper aims to show how these issues in statistical approaches largely stem from disregarding discussions on the ontological status of defense mechanisms and the epistemological consequences linked to them. Studying defense mechanisms as they are manifested in external lifestyles, clouds the distinction between constructs (explanatory terms) and phenomena (empirical referents), which is furthermore necessary for a theoretical model to have explanatory value. Concrete examples are given regarding problems in statistical conceptualizations of defense mechanisms as well as the cursory explanations these tend to describe. Implications for future research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., revised). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
Baumeister, R. F., Dale, K., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology: Reaction formation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation, and denial. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 1081–1124.
Bibring, G. L., Dwyer, T. F., Huntingtion, D. S., & Valenstein, A. F. (1961). A study of the psychological processes in pregnancy and of the earliest mother-child relationship. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 16, 9–72.
Blackman, J. S. (2004). 101 defenses: How the mind shields itself. New York: Routledge.
Brenner, C. (1975). Affects and psychic conflict. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 44(1), 5–28.
Brenner, C. (1981). Defense and defense mechanisms. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 50(4), 557–569.
Brenner, C. (1982). The mind in conflict (p. 200). New York: International Universities Press.
Cooper, S. H. (1989). Recent contributions to the theory of defense mechanisms: A comparative view. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 37(4), 865–891.
Cramer, P. (1987). The development of defense mechanisms. Journal of Personality, 55(4), 597–614.
Cramer, P. (1991). Anger and the use of defense mechanisms in college students. Journal of Personality, 59(1), 39–55.
Cramer, P. (1998). Coping and defense mechanisms: What's the difference? Journal of Personality, 66(6), 919–946.
Cramer, P. (2006). Protecting the self: Defense mechanisms in action. New York: Guilford Press.
Cramer, P. (2015). Defense mechanisms: 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(2), 114–122.
Cramer, P., & Brilliant, M. A. (2001). Defense use and defense understanding in children. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 297–322.
Davidson, K., & MacGregor, M. W. (1998). A critical appraisal of self-report defense mechanism measures. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 965–992.
Freud, S. (1894). The neuro-psychosis of defense (the standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. III, 43–61). J. Strachey. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams (the standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. IV). J. Strachey. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
Freud, S. (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety (the standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XX). J. Strachey. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
Freud, A. (1965). Diagnostic skills and their growth in psycho-analysis. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 46, 31.
Freud, A., Nagera, H., & Freud, W. E. (1965). Metapsychological assessment of the adult personality: The adult profile. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 20(1), 9–41.
Gill, M. M. (1963). Topography and Systems in Psychoanalytic Theory. Psychological Issues Monogr. No. 10. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
Gillett, E. (1987). Defense mechanisms versus defense contents. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 68, 261–269.
Hartmann, H. (1950). Psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 5(1), 7–17.
Kris, E. (1947). Problems in clinical research: Discussion remarks. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 32, 210.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.
McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process. New York: Guilford Press.
Meissner, W. W. (2016). A note on projective identification. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 28(1), 43–67.
Mitchell, S. A., & Black, M. J. (1995). Freud and beyond: A history of modern psychoanalytic thought. New York: Basic Books.
Rapaport, D. (1959). The structure of psychoanalytic theory: A systemizing attempt. In S. E. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science, Formulations of the person and the social context (Vol. III, pp. 57–163). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sjöbäck, H. (1973). The psychoanalytic theory of defensive processes. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
Sjöbäck, H. (1993). What is a mechanism of defense?. In The concept of defense mechanisms in contemporary psychology (pp. 25–37). New York: Springer.
Vaillant, G. E. (1971). Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mechanisms: A 30-year follow-up of 30 men selected for psychological health. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24(2), 107–118.
Vaillant, G. E. (1987). A developmental view of old and new perspectives of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 1(2), 146–156.
Vaillant, G. E. (1992). Ego mechanisms of defense: A guide for clinicans and researchers. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Pub.
Vaillant, G. E. (1994). Ego mechanisms of defense and personality psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 44–50.
Wallerstein, R. S. (1967). Development and metapsychology of the defense organization of the ego. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 15(1), 130–149.
Wallerstein, R. S. (1983). Defenses, defense mechanisms, and the structure of the mind. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 31, 201–225.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research and publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest with respect to the research and publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mihalits, D.S., Codenotti, M. The Conceptual Tragedy in Studying Defense Mechanisms. Integr. psych. behav. 54, 354–369 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09515-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09515-6