Abstract
I further develop the dialogical self theory (DST) by elaborating on temporal dimensions, emphasizing the human need for self-presentation. The self is seen as the subjective center of a multicentered semiotic net, one that mediates between the past and future. A person is an operational entity that occasionally reconstructs him- or herself through the negotiation of internal and external “I-positions.” The conceptual differentiation of a future time zone is proposed by means of elaborating on the zone of distant development (ZDD). The ZDD, along with the zone of proximal development (ZPD), constitutes the future. The ZDD is distanced from the ZPD by an undefined time gap, and the former constructs and involves space around, and even beyond, the semiotic horizon. Major aspirations projected to the ZDD provide a general sense to life in the present time. Future-directedness is revealed in the constructive urge for self-presentation. Humans want to matter and to leave a trace of themselves behind, especially in other people’s lives. The strive for self-presentation is considered one of the most significant urges for people; it is expressed in taking care of others, spreading ideas, creating art, craftsmanship, and so forth. People desire to be signified in a surrounding semiotic system, even after death. So they insert their legacy-signs in the external environment, forming their representatives. The strive for self-presentation emanates from the bilateral nature of interaction between the self and one’s surrounding environment. Also, this strive reveals another semiotic visible field of the indissoluble connection between personal and social identities. In essence, the urge for self-presentation drives procreative thinking and actions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, B. R. O. G. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (pp. 1–9). London: Verso.
Aron, A., Paris, M., & Aron, E. N. (1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1102–1112.
Bakhtin, M. M., Mikhail M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press. 1–32.
Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference (pp. 1–39). Boston: Little, Brown and Co..
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychoogical Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
Boulanger, D. (2017). Expansion of parents’ undetermined experience in Socioeducational programs: Extending the dialogical self theory. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(4), 557–569.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology : A once and future discipline (pp. 1–38). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Das, K. (1993). The game of chess. In In: Inner spaces: New writing by women from Kerala. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Gamsakhurdia, V. (2016). Research of Georgians’ ethnic identity aspects and structure in the modern context. PHD dissertation, p. 102. Retrieved from http://press.tsu.ge/data/image_db_innova/disertaciebi_fsiqologia/vladimer_gamsaxurdia.pdf.
Gamsakhurdia, V. (2017). Quest for ethnic identity in the modern world—The Georgian case. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2017.1309735#metrics-content.
Gamsakhurdia, V. (2018). Adaptation in a dialogical perspective - from acculturation to proculturation. Culture & Psychology, 0(0), 1–15.
Gamsakhurdia, V. (2019). “Self-expansion through proculturation”, in Floor Von Alpen & Susanne Normann (eds.), “Annals of cultural psychology”, volume 5, in press.
Goffman, E. (1999). Presentation of self in everyday life. Peter Smith Pub, Inc., 238–257.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243–281.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Gieser, T. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 1–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society, 1–21.
Hermans, H. J. M., Rijks, T. I., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). Imaginal dialogues in the self: Theory and method. Journal of Personality, 61(2), 207–236.
Hermans, H. J. M., Konopka, A., Oosterwegel, A., & Zomer, P. (2017). Fields of tension in a boundary-crossing world: Towards a democratic Organization of the Self. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(4), 505–535.
Hobsbawm, E. J., & Ranger, T. O. (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge Cambridgeshire (pp. 1–15). Cambridge University Press.
Jahoda, G. (2012). Critical reflections on some recent definitions of “culture”. Culture & Psychology, 18(3), 289–303.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (pp. 291–400). New York: H. Holt and Company.
Komatsu, K. (2010). Emergence of young Children’s presentational self in daily conversation and its Semiotic Foundation. Human Development, 53, 208–228.
Kroeber A., and Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge: Cambridge: The Museum.
Piaget, J., & Weil, A. M. (1951). The development in children of the idea of the homeland and of relations with other countries. International Social Science Bulletin, 3, 561–578.
Rosa, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 11–100). Cambridge University Press.
Shweder, R. A. (2003). Why do men barbecue? : Recipes for cultural psychology (pp. 1–35). Harvard University Press.
Spear-Ellinwood, K. C. (2011). Re-conceptualizing the organizing circumstance of learning.
Stanford University & Center for the Study of language and information (U.S.). (1997). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. Retrieved from https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/intentionality/.
Tanggaard, L., & Tateo, L. (2018). Unity of the real and the non-real: Imagination in action and talk. Nordic Psychology, 70(1), 85–94.
Tateo, L. (2014). Beyond the self and the environment: The psychological horizon. In K. R. Cabell & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology. The catalyzing mind: Beyond models of causality (pp. 223–237). New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media.
Tateo, L. (2015). Just an illusion? Imagination as higher mental function. Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy, 05(06), 1–6.
Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development (pp. 1–28). Sage Publications.
Valsiner, J. (2003). Culture and its transfer: Ways of creating general knowledge through the study of cultural particulars. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture., 2. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1013.
Valsiner, J. (2014). Co-Constructing the Mind Socially: Beyond a Communion. In An invitation to cultural psychology (pp. 50–87). London: Sage.
Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2014). Encountering the border. In A. Yasnitsky, R. van der Veer, & M. Ferrari (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 148–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wagoner, B. (2011). Meaning construction in remembering: A synthesis of Bartlett and Vygotsky. Theoretical psychology: Global transformations and challenges. Ed. / Paul Stenner. Captus Press, 2011, 105–114.
Wagoner, B. (2013). Bartlett’s concept of schema in reconstruction. Theory & Psychology, 23(50), 553–575.
Zittoun, T. (2016). A sociolcultural psychology of the life-course. Social Psychological Review, 18(1), 6–17.
Acknowledgments
I want to thank Jaan Valsiner for invaluable suggestions and commentaries.
I also want to thank reviewers for their thoughtful and very helpful commentaries and suggestions.
I want to thank my mother, dialogs with her are the main source and inspiration of all my ideas.
Funding
This work was supported by the Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation of Georgia (SRNSFG). Grant number: FR-18-101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies on human participants or animals.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he or she has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gamsakhurdia, V.L. “Constructive Urge for Self-Presentation-Mediating between the Past and the Future”. Integr. psych. behav. 53, 238–257 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9466-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9466-2