Abstract
Contemporary semiotic cultural tradition in psychology views human meaning making as unfolding through the negotiation of multiple real and imagined scenarios and storylines. While emphasising this complex and layered nature of meaning making, this research tradition offers little methodological guidance for appreciating and evidencing this multiplicity in data analysis and interpretation. This paper suggests that a methodological approach that combines visual and verbal ways of representing one’s personal stories might offer a useful alternative for evidencing the multiple meanings that individuals create about their personal journeys. By presenting two examples of drawn timeline images and corresponding interview extracts, the paper discusses how the chosen methodological approach offered opportunities for participants to ‘show and tell’ their complex and layered stories, and gave them freedom and agency to shape the research encounter and data production processes. The paper also highlights how the incorporation of visual methods into the methodology enabled the researcher to find alternative ways of interpreting participants’ stories. The paper argues for a purposeful integration of visual and verbal methods, where the semiotic tensions and clashes between these modes can reveal novel ways of seeing researchers’ and participants’ meanings in the making.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In order to protect the confidentiality of participants’ identities, only pseudonyms are used in this paper.
References
Aveling, E.-L., Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2015). A qualitative method for analysing multivoicedness. Qualitative Research, 15(6), 670–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114557991.
Bagnoli, A. (2009). Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 547–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109343625.
Bastos, A. C. (2017). Shadow trajectories: the poetic motion of motherhood meanings through the lens of lived temporality. Culture & Psychology, 23(3), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X16655458.
Croghan, R., Griffin, C., Hunter, J., & Phoenix, A. (2008). Young people’s constructions of self: notes on the use and analysis of the photo-elicitation methods. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701605707.
Flewitt, R. (2011). Bringing ethnography to a multimodal investigation of early literacy in a digital age. Qualitative Research, 11(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111399838.
Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2014). Sensitizing questions: a method to facilitate analyzing the meaning of an utterance. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 48(4), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9265-3.
Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2013). Meaning making in motion: bodies and minds moving through institutional and semiotic structures. Culture & Psychology, 19(4), 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13500325.
Grossen, M. (2010). Interaction analysis and psychology: A dialogical perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-009-9108-9.
Iedema, R. (2003) Multimodality, resemiotization: extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2: 29-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720300200175.
Keats, P. A. (2009). Multiple text analysis in narrative research: visual, written, and spoken stories of experience. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108099320.
Kress, G. R. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. R. (2011). “Partnerships in research”: multimodality and ethnography. Qualitative Research, 11(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111399836.
Luttrell, W. (2003). Pregnant bodies, fertile minds. Gender, race, and the schooling of pregnant teens. New York: Routledge.
Luttrell, W. (2010). “A camera is a big responsibility”: a lens for analysing children’s visual voices. Visual Studies, 25(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2010.523274.
Mannay, D. (2010). Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109348684.
Märtsin, M. (2009). Rupturing otherness: becoming Estonian in the context of contemporary Britain.Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science , 44 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-009-9109-8
Märtsin, M. (2010). Identity in dialogue: identity as hyper-generalized personal sense. Theory &Psychology, 20, 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310363513
Reavey, P. (2011a). The return to experience. Psychology and the visual. In P. Reavey (Ed.), Visual methods in psychology: Using and interpreting images in qualitative research (pp. 1–13). London:Routledge
Reavey, P. (Ed.). (2011b). Visual methods in psychology. Using and interpeting images in qualitative research. London: Routledge.
Reavey, P., & Johnson, K. (2008). Visual approaches: Using and interpreting images. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (296-314). London: Sage.
Rose, G. (2012). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials 3rd edition. London: SAGE.
Rossetti-Ferreira, M. C., Amorim, K. S., & Silva, A. P. S. (2007). Network of meanings: A theoretical-methodological perspective for the investigation of human developmental processes. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 277–290). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Salvatore, S., & Venuleo, C. (2008). Understanding the role of emotion in sense-making. a semiotic psychoanalytic oriented perspective. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 42(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9039-2.
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Dehli: Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2014a). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2014b). Needed for cultural psychology: methodology in a new key. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13515941.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
Zittoun, T. (2017). Modalities of generalization through single case studies. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9367-1.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Jaan Valsiner for his feedback about the earlier version of this paper and acknowledge the feedback from the two anonymous reviewers that greatly helped to clarify the central argument of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares that she has no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study and all data was made anonymous.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Märtsin, M. Beyond Verbal Narratives: Using Timeline Images in the Semiotic Cultural Study of Meaning Making. Integr. psych. behav. 52, 116–128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9409-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9409-3