Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cultural Directions and Origins of Everyday Decisions

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decisions are made by individuals in all societies. Reasons for decisions are difficult to locate, yet configure cultural thinking. While taking decisions people can be culture objective and culture subjective at the same time. Methods in research focus on the universal features or etic, and culture specific features or emic, of the construct of decision making. In the methods used to research decision making lie several answers to the question of how people make decisions. Isolating features of the emic of decision making can be useful in tracing pathways to its etic. The unity of cultural individualism and collectivism steer thinking processes of individuals. As a cognitive undertaking decision making experiences the effects of the larger culture, but the domains of decision making determine in what manner and to what extent these effects will be manifest. Decision making is at once subjective and unconscious, culturally guided and idiosyncratically steered, self-oriented and other-related, situationally derived and universally operationalized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: Rethinking poverty and the ways to end it. London: Random House Group Limited.

  • Briley, D. A., Morris, M. W., & Simonon, I. (2000). Reasons as carriers of culture: dynamic versus dispositional models of cultural influence on decision making. The Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1790/1793). The works of The Right Hon. Edmund Burke, with a biographical and critical introduction, and Portrait after Sir Joshua Reynolds. Vol. II. London: Holdsworth and Ball. [e book, Google Books].

  • Chattopadhyay, S., & Simon, A. (2008). East meets West: cross-cultural perspective in end-of-life decision making from Indian and German viewpoints. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 11(2), 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary, N. (2008). Persistent patterns in cultural negotiations of the self: using dialogical self theory to understand self-other dynamics within culture. International Journal of Dialogical Science, 3(1).

  • Gelfard, M. J., & Christakopoulou, S. (1999). Culture and negotiator cognition: judgment accuracy and negotiation processes in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(3), 248–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joerchel, A. C., & Valsiner, J. (2004). Making decisions about taking medicines: A social coordination process. FQS: Forum Qualitative Social Research [Online journal], 5(1).

  • Mahla, V. P., Bhargava, S. C., Dogra, R., & Shome, S. (1992). The psychology of self-immolation in India. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 34(2), 108–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mau, W. C. (2000). Cultural differences in career decision-making styles and self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. Y., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Individualism-collectivism as a boundary condition for effectiveness of minority influence in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2), 198–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, J. G. (1996). The culture of decision making. R&D Innovator. 5(12). Article 251. Retrieved from www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_index/articles/251-300/article251_body.html, on 2nd December, 2011.

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, D. (2011). The Indian head shake: The power of subjective truth in decision-making. Retrieved from: http://siyahi.in/2011/06/devdutt-pattanaik-3/ , on 14th December, 2011.

  • Tipandjan, A., Schäfer, T., Sundaram, S., & Sedlmeier, P. (2012). What are the important decisions in the lives of German and Indian university students? The structure of real-life decision-making processes. IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J., & Han, G. (2008). Where is culture within the dialogical perspectives on the self? International Journal for Dialogical Science, 3(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lady Irwin College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

    Punya Pillai

Authors
  1. Punya Pillai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Punya Pillai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pillai, P. Cultural Directions and Origins of Everyday Decisions. Integr. psych. behav. 46, 235–242 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-012-9196-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-012-9196-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation