Abstract
The idea that language mediates our thoughts and enables abstract cognition has been a key idea in socio-cultural psychology. However, it is not clear what mechanisms support this process of abstraction. Peirce argued that one mechanism by which language enables abstract thought is hypostatic abstraction, the process through which a predicate (e.g., dark) turns into an object (e.g., darkness). By using novel computational tools we tested Peirce’s idea. Analysis of the data provides empirical support for Peirce’s mechanism and evidence of the way the use of signs enables abstraction. These conclusions are supported by the in-depth analysis of two case studies concerning the abstraction of sweet and dark. The paper concludes by discussing the findings from a broad and integrative theoretical perspective and by pointing to computational cultural psychology as a promising perspective for addressing long-lasting questions of the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The corpus was collected by Charles Clarke at the University of Waterloo.
Wumpus is available at http://www.wumpus-search.org/.
WordNet is available at http://wordnet.princeton.edu/.
The dictionary is available at http://ota.oucs.ox.ac.uk/headers/1054.xml.
A copy of the 114,501 rated terms is available on request from Peter Turney.
References
Barsalou, L. W. (2005). Continuity of the conceptual system across species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 309–311.
Büttcher, S., & Clarke, C. (2005). Efficiency vs. effectiveness in terabyte-scale information retrieval. Proceedings of the 14th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2005), Gaithersburg, MD.
Caron, J. (2001). Experiments with LSA scoring: Optimal rank and basis. Proceedings of the SIAM Computational Information Retrieval Workshop (pp. 157–169). Raleigh, NC.
Church, K. W., & Hanks, P. (1989). Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Association of Computational Linguistics (pp. 76–83). Association for Computational Linguistics, New Brunswick, NJ.
Clark, A. (2006). Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 370–374.
Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce [CP] (Vols. 1–8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Vols. 1–6, C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.; Vols. 7–8, A. W. Burks, Ed.).
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A(4), 497–505.
Danesi, M. (2003). Metaphorical “networks” and verbal communication: a semiotic perspective on human discourse. Sign Systems Studies, 31, 341–363.
Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 410+ million words, 1990-present. Retrieved from http://www.americancorpus.org.
de Saussure, F. (1973). Course in General Linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). London: Duckworth.
Deutscher, G. (2010). Does your language shape how you think? The New York Times, 29 August 2010.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
Lawrence, J. A., & Valsiner, J. (1993). Conceptual roots of internalization: from transmission to transformation. Human Development, 36, 150–167.
Lee, P. (1996). The Whorf theory complex. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Luria, R. A., & Vygotsky, L. S. (1930). Ape, primitive man and child. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Aiden, E. L. (2010). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science [10.1126/science.1199644].
Neuman, Y. (2003). Processes and boundaries of the mind: Extending the limit line. New York: Springer.
Neuman, Y. (2008). Reviving the living: Meaning making in living systems. Oxford: Elsevier.
Neuman, Y. (2009). On love, hate and knowledge. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90, 697–712.
Neuman, Y., & Nave, O. (2009). Metaphor-based meaning excavation. Information Sciences, 179, 2719–2728.
Neuman, Y., & Nave, O. (2010). Why the brain needs language in order to be self-conscious. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 37–48.
Pennebaker, J. W., & Francis, M. E. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count. USA: LEA.
Pezzulo, G., & Castelfranchi, C. (2007). The symbol detachment problem. Cognitive Processes, 8, 115–131.
Rapp, R. (2003). Word sense discovery based on sense descriptor dissimilarity. Proceedings of the Ninth Machine Translation Summit (pp. 315–322). New Orleans.
Salvatore, S., & Venuleo, C. (2008). Understanding the role of emotion in sense making: a semiotic psychoanalytic oriented perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42(1), 32–46.
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis method. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54.
Tobin, Y. (1990). Semiotics and linguistics. London: Longman Publishing Group.
Turney, P. D., & Littman, M. L. (2003). Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 21(4), 315–346.
Turney, P. D., & Pantel, P. (2010). From frequency to meaning: vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 37, 141–188.
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. London: Sage.
Vauclair, J. (2003). Would humans without language be apes? In J. Valsiner & A. Toomela (Eds.), Cultural guidance in the development of the human mind. Vol 7. Advances in child development within culturally structured environment (pp. 9–26). Greenwich: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Volosinov, V. (1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Harvard, MA: The MIT Press. Electronic source: Thinking and speaking http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/words/index.htm
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neuman, Y., Turney, P. & Cohen, Y. How Language Enables Abstraction: A Study in Computational Cultural Psychology. Integr. psych. behav. 46, 129–145 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9165-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9165-8