Abstract
While identity construction continues to be a widely discussed and researched area in contemporary social sciences, the existing theories have overlooked the importance of understanding why and how identities as semiotic constructions emerge in individuals’ consciousness in the flow of their everyday functioning. This article seeks to address this limitation in the theorizing by proposing an alternative conceptualization of identity, according to which identity construction is triggered by rupturing life-experience, which surfaces another perspective and makes the person aware of a possibility to be otherwise or of the reality of being different. Theoretical claims put forward in the paper are drawn from data gathered in a recent study, which explored lived-through experiences of young Estonians, who made study-visits to the United Kingdom. The discussed data will also highlight some interesting aspects in Estonians’ self-definition as it is constructed in relation to Eastern-European identity in the context of contemporary Britain.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Here reference is made to the famous slogan used by Gustav Suits (1883-1956): “Let us be Estonians, but let us become Europeans!”. Suits was a leading figure of Noor Eesti (Young Estonia), a literary movement group that played an important role in forming Estonian national consciousness in the years leading to the WWI.
Setos are an indigenous ethnic and linguistic minority in south-eastern Estonia and north-western Russia.
References
Abbey, E. (2007). At the boundary of me and you: Semiotic architecture of thinking and feeling the other. In L. M. Simão & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Otherness in question. Labyrinths of the self (pp. 73–92). Charlotte: Information Age.
Bauman, Z. (2001). Identity in the globalising world. Social Anthropology, 9(2), 121–129.
Berg, E. (2002). Local resistance, national Identity and global swings in post-Soviet Estonia. Europe-Asia Studies, 54(1), 109.
Berry, J. W. (2005). Acculturation: living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(6), 697–712.
Berry, J. W. (2009). A critique of critical acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(5), 361–371.
Bhatia, S. (2002). Acculturation, dialogical voices and the construction of the diasporic self. Theory & Psychology, 12(1), 55–77.
Bhatia, S. (2007). American karma: Race, culture, and identity in the Indian diaspora. New York: New York University.
Bhatia, S. & Ram, A. (2001a). Locating the dialogical self in the age of transnational migrations, border crossings and diasporas. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 297–309.
Bhatia, S. & Ram, A. (2001b). Rethinking ‘acculturation’ in relation to diasporic cultures and postcolonial identities. Human Development, 44(1), 1–18.
Bhatia, S. & Ram, A. (2009). Theorizing identity in transnational and diaspora cultures: a critical approach to acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(2), 140–149.
Brinkmann, S. (2008). Identity as self-interpretation. Theory & Psychology, 18(3), 404–422.
Brüggemann, K. (2003). Leaving the ‘Baltic’ States and ‘Welcome to Estonia’: re-regionalising Estonian identity. European Review of History, 10(2), 343–360.
Chirkov, V. (2009). Critical psychology of acculturation: what do we study and how do we study it, when we investigate acculturation? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(2), 94–105.
Clancy, G. (2008). Employment of foreign workers in the United Kingdom: 1997 to 2008. Economic & Labour Market Review, 2(7), 18–30.
Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels & K. D. Guttierez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Gillespie, A. (2006). Becoming other: From social interaction to self-reflection. Charlotte: Information Age.
Hermans, H. J. (2001). The dialogical self: toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243.
Hogg, M. A. & Terry, D. J. (2001). Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia: Psychology.
Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two stories: a critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255–269.
Howard, J. A. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 367–393.
Iyer, P. (2000). The global soul: Jet lag, shopping malls, and the search for home. New York: Vintage.
Joenniemi, P. (2005). The challenges of “new” and “old”: The case of Europe’s north. In D. J. Smith (Ed.), The Baltic States and their region. New Europe or old? (pp. 67–85). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Ker, D. & Kham, K. (2009). Employment of foreign workers: Period of arrival. London: Office for National Statistics.
Kirch, M. (2004). Eesti ja Euroopa identiteet [Estonian and European identity]. In A. Valk (Ed.), Eesti ja eestlased võrdlevas perspektiivis. Kultuuridevahelisi uurimusi 20. sajandi lõpust [Estonia and Estonians from the comparative perspective. Cross-cultural studies from the end of the 20th century] (pp. 87–101). Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Lehti, M. (2005). Estonia and Latvia: A “new” Europe challenges the “old”? The Baltic States and their region. New Europe or old? (pp. 87–114). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Märtsin, M. (2009). Identity construction as a personal sense-making process: A case study of Estonian students in the United Kingdom (Unpublished PhD Thesis). University of Bath.
Märtsin, M. (2010). Making sense of identity dialogues. Culture & Psychology, 16(1).
Molenaar, P. C. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218.
Murakami, K. & Middleton, D. (2006). Grave matters: emergent networks and summation in remembering and reconciliation. Ethos, 34(2), 273–296.
Noreen, E. & Sjöstedt, R. (2004). Estonian identity formations and threat framing in the post-Cold War era. Journal of Peace Research, 41(6), 733.
Phinney, J. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 499–514.
Phinney, J. S. & Ong, A. D. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: current status and future directions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(3), 271.
Phinney, J. S., Horenczyk, G., Liebkind, K., & Vedder, P. (2001). Ethnic identity, immigration, and well-being: an interactional perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 493–510.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University.
Rudmin, F. (2009). Constructs, measurements and models of acculturation and acculturative stress. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(2), 106–123.
Sato, T., Yasuda, Y., Kido, A., Arakawa, A., Mizoguchi, H., & Valsiner, J. (2007). Sampling reconsidered: Idiographic science and the analysis of personal life trajectories. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 82–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Shi-xu. (2006). Mind, self and consciousness as discourse. New Ideas in Psychology, 24(1), 63–81.
Shotter, J. & Gergen, K. J. (1989). Texts of identity. London: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Newbury Park: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford.
Stets, J. E. & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.
Stryker, S. & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). London: Academic.
Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development, 44, 84–97.
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Dehli: Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2008). Ornamented worlds and textures of feeling: the power of abundance. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 1, 67–78.
Vetik, R. (2003). Élite vs. people? Eurosceptic public opinion in Estonia. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 16(2), 257–271.
Vihalemm, T. (2004). Eesti keele roll kultuuridevahelises kommunikatsioonis [The role of Estonian language in cross-cultural communication]. In A. Valk (Ed.), Eesti ja eestlased võrdlevas perspektiivis. Kultuuridevahelisi uurimusi 20. sajandi lõpust [Estonia and Estonians from the comparative perspective. Cross-cultural studies from the end of the 20th century] (pp. 246–261). Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Vihalemm, T., & Keller, M. (2001). Estonian society carried by the tide of Western consumer culture. Estonian Human Development Report, pp. 80–83. Tallinn: Tallinn Pedagogical University.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University.
Waldram, J. B. (2009). Is there a future for “Culture” in acculturation research? An anthropologist’s perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(2), 173–176.
Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Yaroshevsky, M. (1989). Outstanding Soviet psychologists: Lev Vygotsky. Moscow: Progress.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Charlotte: Information Age.
Zittoun, T. (2007a). Dynamics of interiority. Ruptures and transitions in the self developmen. In L. M. Simão & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Otherness in question. Labyrinths of the self (pp. 187–214). Charlotte: Information Age.
Zittoun, T. (2007b). The role of symbolic resources in human lives. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 343–361). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Acknowledgements
I am thankful to Harry Daniels for his helpful comments on the earlier version of this paper, and to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive critique.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Märtsin, M. Rupturing Otherness: Becoming Estonian in the Context of Contemporary Britain. Integr. psych. behav. 44, 65–81 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-009-9109-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-009-9109-8