Abstract
Perception is an intentional action through space in time by which the finite brain explores the infinite world. By acting, the brain thrusts its body into the future space–time of the world while predicting the sensory consequences. Through perceiving its actions and their results, it remembers its predictions, its actions, and their consequences. To perform these operations the brain, through chaotic dynamics, constructs and uses finite perceptual matrices of space–time and infers causation. Perceived time differs from world time in ways that are determined by the neural mechanisms of intentionality. In particular, perception of the self in action, through the mechanism of preafference, gives structure and content to the concepts of continuity, contiguity, duration, temporal order, cause, and effect. We expand our perceptual scales beyond kinesthesia by converting time into space by use of clocks and calendars. Remembered time differs from perceived time in being dependent on awareness, which makes it episodic, fragmentary, and subject to large variations in rates of time lapse in the flow of meanings. The attribution of causal agency to objects and events in the world results from the experience of temporal sequencing in the action–perception cycle: “I act” [cause] “I feel” [effect] during Piaget’s somatomotor phase in early human development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aquinas, S. T. (1272/1952). The Summa Theologica. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Revised by Daniel J Sullivan. Published by William Benton as volume 19, Great Books Series. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
Barrie, J. M., Freeman, W. J., & Lenhart, M. (1996). Modulation by discriminative training of spatial patterns of gamma EEG amplitude and phase in neocortex of rabbits. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 520–539.
Bressler, S. L., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2001). Cortical coordination dynamics and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5(1), 26–36.
Freeman, W. J. (1975). Mass action in the nervous system. New York: Academic.
Freeman, W. J. (1995). Societies of brains. A study in the neuroscience of love and hate. Mahwah NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Freeman, W. J. (2001). How brains make up their minds. New York: Columbia University Press.
Freeman, W. J. (2005). NDN, volume transmission, and self-organization in brain dynamics. Journal in Integrative Neuroscience, 4(4), 407–421.
Glass, L., & Mackey, M. C. (1988). From clocks to chaos: The rhythms of life. Princeton NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Grillner, S., Deliagina, T., El Manira, A., Hill, R. H., Orlovsky, G. N., & Wallén, P. (1995). Neural networks that co-ordinate locomotion and body orientation in lamprey. Trends in Neurosciences, 18(6), 270–279.
Hobbes, T. (1651/1904). Leviathan; or, The Matter, Forme and Power of Commonwealth, Ecclesiasticall and Civill. In A. R. Waller (Ed.). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hume, D. (1739). Treatise on human nature. London: J Noon.
Kant, I. (1781/1974). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. In W. von Weischedel (Ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Kay, L. M., & Freeman, W. J. (1998). Bidirectional processing in the olfactory-limbic axis during olfactory behavior. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 541–553.
Kelso, S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Kopell, N., & Ermentraut, G. B. (1990). Phase transitions and other phenomena in chains of coupled oscillators. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 50(4), 1014–1052.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phenomenology of perception. New York: Humanities Press (C Smith, Trans.).
Piaget, J. (1930). The child’s conception of physical causality. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Rosenbaum, D. A., & Collyer, C. E. (1998). Timing of behavior. Neural, psychological, and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Sperry, R. W. (1950). Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 43, 482–489.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
von Holst, E., & Mittelstädt, H. (1950). Das Reafferenzprinzip. Wechselwirkung zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie. Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464–476.
Willis, T. (1664/1964). The anatomy of the brain and nerves (Cerebri Anatome). In W. Feindel (Ed.). Montreal, Canada: McGill University Press.
Willis, T. (1683/1971). Two discourses concerning the soul of brutes, which is that of the vital and sensitive of man. Diamond S. (introduction). Gainesville FL: Scholars’ Facsimilies & Reprints.
Wilson, M. A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1993). Dynamics of the hippocampal ensemble code for space. Science, 261, 1055–1058.
Winfree, A. T. (1987). The timing of biological clocks. New York: Scientific American Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Abridged from: Cognitive Processing 1: 18–34, 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freeman, W.J. Perception of Time and Causation Through the Kinesthesia of Intentional Action. Integr. psych. behav. 42, 137–143 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9049-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9049-0