Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Homophobia as a Boundary Phenomenon: The Dynamic Dance Between Different Tensions

  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From the commentaries presented in this issue, the main goal of this reply is to improve the analysis of homophobia as a boundary phenomenon of affective meaning-making, a collective historical–cultural construction. According to dialectical philosophical tradition, the notion of tension of opposites united within the same whole is a central notion that assumes an important role in the studies of meaning-making processes (Josephs and Valsiner, Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(1):68–83, 1998). Therefore, this paper intends to analyze homophobia issues from the dynamic dance between different tensions: (a) the tension between the general and the particular; (b) the tension between the HEIMWEH and the FERNWEH processes; and (c) the tension between stability and change. Presented in the conclusion are some suggestions for future approaches about homophobia that could be advanced within the general area of cultural psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. News extracted from the site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/portuguese. This site was visited on 03.16.07.

  2. In the original:

    “Os psicólogos deverão contribuir, com seu conhecimento, para uma reflexão sobre o preconceito e o desaparecimento de discriminações e estigmatizações contra aqueles que apresentam comportamentos ou práticas homoeróticas” (Artigo 2°—Resolução do Conselho Federal de Psicologia, Número 1/99 de 23 de março de 1999—Brasil).

References

  • Andersen, M. L. (2000). Thinking about women: Sociological perspectives on sex and gender. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

  • Branco, A. U., & Madureira, A. F. A. (2004). Communication, affect and self-construction. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on the Dialogical Self, August, Warsaw, Poland.

  • Bourdieu, P. (2005). A Dominação Masculina. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capezza, N. (2007). Homophobia and sexism: The pros and cons to an integrative approach. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9027-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conselho Federal de Psicologia (1999). Resolução CFP N o 1/99 de 23 de março de 1999. Estabelece normas de atuação para os psicólogos em relação à questão da orientação sexual.

  • Conselho Nacional de Combate à Discriminação (2004). Brasil sem Homofobia: Programa de Combate à Violência e à Discriminação contra GLTB e de Promoção da Cidadania Homossexual. Brasília: Secretaria Especial dos Direitos Humanos da Presidência da República.

  • DaMatta, R. (1987). A casa e a rua: Espaço, cidadania, mulher e morte no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fone, B. (2000). Homophobia: A history. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1996). Microfísica do Poder. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves, M. M., & Machado, C. (2007). “Homophobia”: A dialogical-semiotic approach. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9034-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Lopes, G. (2005). Erotic journeys: Mexican immigrants and their sex lives. California: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iborra, A. (2007). Dealing with homosexuality in a homophobic culture: A self-organization approach. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9030-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerchel, A. C. (2007). A dance between the general and the specific: Implications for the self concept. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9031-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephs, I. E. (2007). The semiotic regulation of sexuality from a microgenetic perspective. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9028-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephs, I. E., & Valsiner, J. (1998). How does autodialogue work? Miracles of meaning maintenance and circumvention strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(1), 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2007). Gatekeeping and homophobia: From bouncers in bars to the macro-social, interpersonal, and intrapsychological practices of homophobia. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9029-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullasepp, K. (2007). Affective guidance of sexual identity construction: Intra psychological level in the service of culture. Integrative Psychological & Behaviorial Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9026-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madureira, A. F. A. (2000). A construção das identidades sexuais não-hegemônicas: gênero, linguagem e constituição da subjetividade. Dissertação de Mestrado, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.

  • Madureira, A. F. A. (2007). The psychological basis of homophobia: Cultural construction of a barrier. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9024-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morioka, M. (2007). The possibility of a fuzzy zone of semiotic activity. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9025-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. (1991). Corpos, Prazeres e Paixões: A Cultura Sexual no Brasil Contemporâneo. São Paulo: Editora Best Seller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, S. J. (2007). Boundaries, exclusion, and oppression in “the psychological basis of homophobia”: Cultural construction of a barrier. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9023-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, N. (2001). Anti-discriminatory Practice. England: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1989). Human development and culture: The social nature of personality and its study. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1994). Bidirectional cultural transmission and constructive sociogenesis. In W. de Graaf & R. Maier (eds.), Sociogenesis Reexamined (pp. 47–70). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2003). Sensuality and sense: Cultural construction of the human nature. Human Affairs, 13, 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2005). Affektive Entwicklung im kulturellen Kontext [Affective Development in Cultural Context]. In J. B. Asendorpf (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Soziale, emotionale und Persönlichkeitsentwicklung (Vol. 3, pp. 677–728). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

  • Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wants to thank the National Committee for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq (Brazil) for the financial support of her Ph.D. studies, included the period that she was Visiting Student of the Psychology Department at Clark University in Worcester—MA (USA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Psychology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil

    Ana Flávia do Amaral Madureira

Authors
  1. Ana Flávia do Amaral Madureira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Flávia do Amaral Madureira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

do Amaral Madureira, A.F. Homophobia as a Boundary Phenomenon: The Dynamic Dance Between Different Tensions. Integr. psych. behav. 41, 326–342 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9027-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9027-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation