Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sexual Harassment in the Egyptian Streets: Feminist Theory Revisited

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the act of sexual harassment, as perceived by Egyptian male harassers. Participants’ justifications of their harassing acts were explained using feminist theory, which postulated that sexual harassment occurs due to men’s tendency to blame women for this act, their failure to empathize with its victims, and their attempt to punish their competitive efforts. In-depth interviews were conducted with nine self-professed harassers. Thematic analysis of these interviews produced theory-driven themes that reflected the above mentioned assertions of feminist theory. Moreover, thematic analysis added cultural depth to this theory’s explanation of sexual harassment by producing emerging themes that highlighted the roles of participants’ strict interpretations of religious texts and experiences of societal oppression in justifying this act. Recommendations for mental health professionals and policy makers who design intervention and prevention programs for sexual harassment will be presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammar, N. H. (2006). Beyond the shadows: Domestic spousal violence in a “democratizing” Egypt. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 7, 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. E., Abraham, M., Bruessow, D. M., Coleman, R. D., McCarthy, K. C., Harris-Odimgbe, T., et al. (2008). Cross-cultural perspectives on intimate partner violence. Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 21, 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks. An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avina, C., & O’Donohue, W. (2002). Sexual harassment and PTSD: Is sexual harassment diagnosable trauma? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15, 69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. D., Terpstra, D. E., & Larntz, K. (1990). The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 22(5–6), 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC (2012). Egypt’s Sexual Harassment of women “epidemic” http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-19440656.

  • Berdahl, J. L. (2007). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32, 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, C. G. (1993). Street harassment and the informal ghettoization of women. Harvard Law Review, 106, 517–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative. Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., Josephson, W., Schnoll, J., Simkins-Strong, E., Pepler, D., MacPherson, A., et al. (2014). Evaluation of a youth-led program for preventing bullying, sexual harassment, and dating aggression in middle schools. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 403–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., & Lindisfarne, N. (1994). Dislocating masculinity: comparative ethnographies. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeSouza, E. R., Solberg, J., & Elder, C. (2007). A cross-cultural perspective on judgments of woman-to-woman sexual harassment: Does sexual orientation matter? Sex Roles, 56(7–8), 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Deeb, B. (2013). Study on ways and methods to eliminate sexual harassment in Egypt. UN Women Online Report. http://www.unwomen.org/publications/study-on-ways-andmethods-to-eliminate-sexual-harassment-in-egypt.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child. In: S. Ferenczi (Ed.), Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis. London: Maresfield Reprints, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, A. N. (1979). Sexual trauma in the life of rapists and child molesters. Victimology, 4, 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., & Koss, M. P. (1993). Changed women and changed organizations: Consequences of and coping with sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez, S. (2012). No longer a bargain, women, oppression and the Egyptian uprising. American Ethnologist, 39, 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halai, N. (2007). Making use of bilingual interview data: Some expressions from the field. Qualitative Research Report, 12(3), 344–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harassmap (2012) http://harassmap.org/en/.

  • Joseph, S. (1996). Patriarchy and development in the Arab World. Gender and Development, 4, 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowkar, F. (1986). Honor and shame: A feminist view from within. Feminist Issues, 6, 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2, 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosny, A., & MacEachen, E. (2010). Gendered, invisible work in non-profit social service organizations: Implications for worker health and safety. Gender, Work & Organization, 17, 359–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, V. K., & Luthar, H. K. (2002). Using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions to explain sexually harassing behaviours in an international context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 268–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M., & Dean, K. (1991). Attraction to sexual aggression (pp. 229–247). Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. (2001). Mobilizing masculinities’: Women’s experiences of men at work. Organization, 8, 587–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, K. S., Shoss, N. E., & Pincus, A. L. (2010). Attachment and personality predicts engagement in sexual harassment in male and female college students. Violence and Victims, 25, 770–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkin, R. (2008). Cross-cultural differences in perceiving sexual harassment: Demographic incidence rates of sexual harassment/sexual aggression in Latin America. North American Journal of Psychology, 10, 277–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money, J. (1986). Lovemaps: Clinical concepts of sexual/erotic health and pathology, paraphilia, and gender transposition of childhood, adolescence, and maturity. New York: Ardent Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. (1994). A passion for difference: Essays in anthropology and gender. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, E., & O’Donohue, W. (1998). Sexual harassment: Identifying risk factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27(6), 561–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri, P. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis of posttraumatic stress symptoms in sexually harassed women. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18, 657–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pina, A., Gannon, T. A., & Saunders, B. (2009). An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: Perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 126–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. B., & Stoller, L. M. (1994). Sexual cognition processes in men high in the likelihood to sexually harass. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi, R., & Liston, D. D. (2009). What does she expect when she dresses like that? Teacher interpretation of emerging adolescent female sexuality. Educational Studies, 45, 512–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozee, P. D., & Koss, M. P. (2001). Rape: A century of resistance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, H. (2003). Sexual harassment in the workplace: A feminist analysis of recent developments in the UK. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26, 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, V. (1998). Reconceptualizing sexual harassment. The Yale Law Journal, 107, 1683–1805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweinle, W. E., Cofer, C., & Schatz, S. (2009). Men’s empathic bias, empathic inaccuracy, and sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 60, 142–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweinle, W. E., & Roseman, C. P. (2015). Sexual harassment training: Effective strategies. In M. Paludi, J. Martin, J. Gruber and S. Fineran (Eds.), Sexual harassment in education and work settings: Current research and best practices for prevention (p. 247–260). CT: Praeger Publishers.

  • Suarez, E., & Gadalla, T. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2010–2035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, G., & Bajema, C. (1999). Sexual harassment in northwest Europe: A cross-cultural comparison. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 6, 419–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulusoy, H., Swigart, V., & Erdemir, F. (2011). Think globally, act locally: Understanding sexual harassment from a cross-cultural perspective. Medical Education, 45, 603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaux, A. (1993). Paradigmatic assumptions in sexual harassment research: Being guided without being misled. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 116–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Unit, The American University in Cairo, PO Box 74, New Cairo, 11835, Egypt

    Hani M. Henry

Authors
  1. Hani M. Henry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hani M. Henry.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Participants received a copy of an informed consent that was approved by the University’s Institutional Review Board and included details of the interview, such as its purpose, taping process, and expected timeframe. Participants’ anonymity was assured, so they did not sign a copy of this form.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henry, H.M. Sexual Harassment in the Egyptian Streets: Feminist Theory Revisited. Sexuality & Culture 21, 270–286 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9393-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9393-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation