Abstract
Previous research has established that men and women respond differently to distinctive characteristics of mediated sexual portrayals. The current study experimentally tests a series of predictions derived from both sperm competition, and minimal parental investment perspectives about between- and within-gender responses to content manipulations of sexually explicit videos. Results indicate that men experienced greater post-exposure arousal and less negative affect after viewing sexually explicit videos than did women. Further, men who viewed more explicit sexual depictions tended to report greater post-exposure arousal than those who saw less explicit depictions. No within-gender differences were found for women in terms of content explicitness. Also, regardless of degree of explicitness, women reported lower levels of post-exposure arousal in response to content depicting male ejaculation than content that does not. Men, though expressing greater post-exposure arousal to less explicit content depicting male sexual climax than that which does not, showed no difference in arousal response when they saw more intensely explicit depictions, whether or not male ejaculation was shown. Findings are discussed in terms of their implications for future application of evolutionary theory in studies of mediated sexual content.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1989). Number of sperm in human ejaculates varies in accordance with competition theory. Animal Behavior, 37, 867–869.
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation. Animal Behavior, 46, 861–885.
Brosius, H. B., Weaver, J. B., & Staab, J. F. (1993). Exploring the social and sexual “reality” of contemporary pornography. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 161–170.
Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic books.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
Cowan, G., Lee, C., Levy, D., & Snyder, D. (1988). Dominance and inequality in x-rated videocassettes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 299–311.
DeLamater, J. D., & Sill, M. S. (2005). Sexual desire in later life. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 138–149.
DelBarco-Trillo, J., & Ferkin, M. H. (2004). Male mammals respond to a risk of sperm competition conveyed by odours of conspecific males. Nature, 431, 446–449.
Gallup, G. G., Burch, R. L., Zappieri, M. L., Parvez, R. A., Stockwell, M. L., & Davis, J. A. (2003). The human penis as a semen displacement device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 277–289.
Garcia, L. T., & Milano, L. (1991). A content analysis of erotic videos. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 3, 95–103.
Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Euler, H. A., Hoier, S., Schmitt, D. P., et al. (2005). Mate retention, semen displacement, and human sperm competition: A preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 749–763.
Grados, P. S., & Mosher, D. L. (1999). Gender differences in reactions to viewing pornographic vignettes: Essential or interpretive? Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 11(2), 65–83.
Gunter, B. (2002). Media sex: What are the issues?. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hald, G. M. (2006). Gender differences in pornography consumption among young heterosexual Danish Adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 577–585.
Harcourt, A. H., Harvey, P. H., Larson, S. G., & Short, R. V. (1981). Testis weight, body weight, and breeding system in primates. Nature, 293, 55–57.
Hays, R., & Dennerstein, L. (2005). The impact of aging on sexual function and sexual dysfunction on women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2, 317–330.
Kilgallon, S. J., & Simmons, L. W. (2005). Image content influences men’s semen quality. Biology Letters, 1, 253–255.
Lane, F. S. (2001). Obscene profits: The entrepreneurs of pornography in the cyber age. Florence, KY: Routledge.
Linz, D., & Malamuth, N. (1993). Pornography: Communication concepts. London: Sage.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1986). Pornography: Not a moral issue. Women’s Studies International Forum, 9, 63–78.
Malamuth, N. M. (1996). Sexually explicit media, gender differences, and evolutionary theory. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 8–31.
McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Zanna, M. P. (1990). Treating women as sexual objects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 296–308.
Mosher, D. L., & Maclan, P. (1994). College men and women respond to X-rated videos intended for male or female audiences: Gender and sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 99–113.
Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews, 45, 525–567.
Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is transforming our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York: Times Books.
Paul, B. (2009). Predicting Internet pornography use and arousal: The role of individual difference variables. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 1–14.
Paul, B., & Shim, J. (2008). Gender, sexual affect, and motivations for internet pornography use. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20, 187–199.
Pound, N. (2002). Male interest in visual cues of sperm competition risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 443–466.
Pound, N., & Gage, M. J. G. (2004). Prudent sperm allocation in Norway rats, Rattus norvegicus: A mammalian model of adaptive ejaculate adjustment. Animal Behaviour, 68, 819–823.
Pound, N., Javed, M. H., Ruberto, C., Shaikh, M. A., & Del Valle, A. P. (2002). Duration of sexual arousal predicts semen parameters for masturbatory ejaculates. Physiology & Behavior, 76, 685–689.
Pound, N., Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2006). Sperm competition in humans. In T. K. Shackelford & N. Pound (Eds.), Sperm competition in humans: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. 3–32). New York: Springer.
Pounder, D. (Producer/Writer/Director). (2006). Entering the student body [Motion picture]. United States: Dave Pounder Productions.
Prins, G. S., & Zaneveld, L. J. D. (1979). Distribution of spermatozoa in the rabbit vas deferens. Biology of Reproduction, 21, 181–185.
Prins, G. S., & Zaneveld, J. D. (1980). Radiographic study of fluid transport in the rabbit vas deferens during sexual rest and after sexual activity. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 58, 311–319.
Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2007). Adaptations to sperm competition in humans. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 47–50.
Short, R. V. (1979). Sexual selection and its component parts, somatic and genital selection as illustrated man and the great apes. In J. S. RosenBlatt (Ed.), Advances in the Study of Behavior, 9, 131–158.
Smith, R. L. (1984). Human sperm competition. In R. L. Smith (Ed.), Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (pp. 601–660). London: Academic Press.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the decent of man (pp. 1871–1971). Chicago: Aldine.
Yamamoto, Y., Sofikitis, N., Mio, Y., & Miyagawa, I. (2000). Influence of sexual stimulation on sperm parameters in semen samples collected via masturbation from normozoospermic men or cryptozoospermic men participating in an assisted reproduction programme. Andrologia, 32(3), 131–138.
Yang, N., & Linz, D. (1991). Movie ratings and the content of adult videos: The sex-violence ratio. Journal of Communication, 40, 28–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paul, B., Kobach, M.J. Male–Female Reactions to Variations in Sexual Explicitness in Pornography: An Empirical Test of Predictions of Intra- and Inter-gender Differences. Sexuality & Culture 18, 56–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9173-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9173-6