Abstract
This essay is an exploratory study of the uses and gratifications of social networking applications and sites widely utilized by gay men. Based on findings from six different focus groups and intercept interviews with gay and bisexual men, this essay explores the motivations and perceived benefits of social networking sites that allow for the creation of a virtual community of sexual minorities. This paper also considers these technological developments as part of a larger history of gay men communicating with other gay men within a culture where talk about homosexuality is closely policed and often restricted. Through a uses and gratifications approach, this essay discusses the needs and motivations that bring gay men online to social network sites, how they manage multiple identities online and the resulting gratifications of their online activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acar, A. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of online social networking behavior: The case of facebook. Journal of Website Promotion, 3(1/2), 62–83. doi:10.1080/15533610802052654.
Ancu, M., & Cozma, R. (2009). Myspace politics: Uses and gratifications of befriending candidates. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(4), 567–583. doi:10.1080/08838150903333064.
Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2010). Millennials will make online sharing in networks a lifelong habit. Pew Research. Retrieved from Pewinternet.org website: http://pewresearch.org/millennials/.
Anthony, M. (2008). Looking for love, 2.0. Frontiers, 26(20), 53–54.
Ashford, C. (2006). The only gay in the village: Sexuality and the net. Information & Communications Technology Law, 15(3), 275–289. doi:10.1080/13600830600961202.
Baams, L., Jonas, K., Utz, S., Bos, H., & Van Der Vuurst, L. (2011). Internet use and online social support among same sex attracted individuals of different ages. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1820–1827.
Bargh, J. A., & Mckenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573–590.
Blumler, J. G. (1985). The social character of media gratifications. In K. E. Rosengren, L. A. Wenner, & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research (pp. 41–60). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Blumler, J. G., & Mcquail, D. (1969). Television in politics. Its uses and influence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
Byeng-Hee, C., Seung-Eun, L., & Byoung-Sun, K. (2006). Exploring factors affecting the adoption and continuance of online games among college students in South Korea: Integrating uses and gratification and diffusion of innovation approaches. New Media & Society, 8(2), 295–319. doi:10.1177/1461444806059888.
Byrne, D. N. (2007). Public discourse, community concerns, and civic engagement: Exploring black social networking traditions on blackplanet.Com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 319–340. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00398.x.
Chauncey, G. (1994). Gay New York: Gender, urban culture, and the making of the gay male world. New York: Basic Books.
Clark, L., & Roberts, S. (2010). Employer’s use of social networking sites: A socially irresponsible practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 507–525. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0436-y.
Davison, K., Pennebaker, J., & Dickerson, S. (2000). Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. American Psychology, 55, 205–217.
Dreier, T. (2009). There’s a (gay) app for that. Advocate (1027/1028), 20.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.
Evans, V. D. (2007). Curved tv: The impact of televisual images on gay youth. American Communication Journal, 9(3), 7–17.
Farrell, K. P. (2006). HIV on tv: Conversations with young gay men. Sexualities, 9(2), 193–213.
Gay and lesbian adults are more likely and more frequent blog readers. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.harrisinteractive.com/NewsRoom/PressReleases/tabid/446/mid/1506/articleId/435/ctl/ReadCustomDefault/Default.aspx.
Gay and lesbian adults more likely to read blogs and use social networking tools. (2009). Echelon Intel, 1–1.
Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Boston: Pearson.
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1130–1162.
Grimmelmann, J. (2009). Saving facebook. (privacy on social network sites). Iowa Law Review, 94(4), 1137–1170.
Gudelunas, D. (2005). Online personal ads—community and sex, virtually. Journal of Homosexuality, 49(1), 1–33.
Hardey, M. (2004). Mediated relationships. Information, Communication & Society, 7(2), 207–222. doi:10.1080/1369118042000232657.
Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–298.
Harwood, J. (1997). Viewing age: Lifespan identity and television viewing choices. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 201–213.
Hook up violence is on the rise. (2010). Frontiers, 29(2), 16.
Humphreys, L. (1970). Tearoom trade. London: Duckworth.
Ibrahim, Y. (2008). The new risk communities: Social networking sites and risk. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 4(2), 245–253. doi:10.1386/macp.4.2.245_3.
Jackson, N. A., & Lilleker, D. G. (2007). Seeking unmediated political information in a mediated environment: The uses and gratifications of political parties’ e-newsletters. Information, Communication & Society, 10(2), 242–264. doi:10.1080/13691180701307495.
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523.
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2002). Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 54.
Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2004). A web for all reasons: Uses and gratifications of internet components for political information. Telematics and Informatics, 21(3), 197–223. doi:10.1016/s0736-5853(03)00037-6.
King, J. (2010, April 28, 2010). Iphone’s gay social networking app leads to murder of phoenix man, police claim, Phoneix New Times.
Kruegar, R. A. (1998). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Larose, R., & Eastin, M. S. (2004). A social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 358–377.
Leslie, J. (2009). Grindr app makes it easy to be easy. Out & About, 8, 8–26.
Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393–411.
Mahajan, P. (2009). Use of social networking in a linguistically and culturally rich India. International Information & Library Review, 41, 129–136. doi:10.1016/j.iilr.2009.07.004.
Mckenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the internset: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 681–694.
Moita-Lopes, L. P. (2006). Queering literacy teaching: Analyzing gay-themed discourses in a fifth-grade class in Brazil. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 5(1), 31–50.
Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
New LGBT social networking site launches. (2010). Quest: Wisconsin’s Gay News Leader, 17(3), 6–6.
Ordering in. (2008). Genre Magazine (165), 13–14.
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 175–196.
Putman, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Shuster.
Rhodes, S. D. (2004). Hookups or health promotion? An exploratory study of a chat room-based HIV prevention intervention for men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevention, 16, 315–327.
Richardson, J. D. (2003). Uses and gratifications of agnostic refuge: Case study of a skeptical online congregation. Journal of Media & Religion, 2(4), 237–250.
Rubin, A. M. (1984). Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication, 34, 67–81.
Rubin, A. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1985). Interface of personal and mediated communication: A research agenda. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2, 36–53.
Silenzio, V. M. B., Duberstein, P. R., Tang, W., Lu, N., Tu, X., & Homan, C. M. (2009). Connecting the invisible dots: Reaching lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents and young adults at risk for suicide through online social networks. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 469–474.
Smith, C. (2010). Social network led to man’s murder, police say. Huffington Post. Retrieved from The Huffington Post website: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/30/mark-woodlands-gay-social_n_558239.html.
Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 412–434.
Stephure, R. J., Boon, S. D., Mackinnon, S. L., & Deveau, V. L. (2009). Internet initiated relationships: Associations between age and involvement in online dating. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 658–681. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01457.x.
Strehlke, C. (2010). Social network sites: A starting point for career development practitioners. Journal of Employment Counseling, 47(1), 38(11).
Stryker, S., & Van Buskirk, J. (1996). Gay by the bay: A history of queer culture in the San Francisco bay area. San Francisco: Chronicle Books.
Tanis, M. (2007). Online social support groups. In A. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U. Reips (Eds.), Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 137–152). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Taraszow, T., Aristodemou, E., Shitta, G., Laouris, Y., & Arsoy, A. (2010). Disclosure of personal and contact information by young people in social networking sites: An analysis using facebook profiles as an example. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 6(1), 81–101. doi:10.1386/macp.6.1.81/1.
Turner, M. (2003). Backward glances: Cruising the queer streets of New York and London. London: Reaktion Books.
Tustin, N. (2010). The role of patient satisfaction in online health information seeking. Journal of Health Communication, 15(1), 3–17. doi:10.1080/10810730903465491.
Utz, S. (2009). The (potential) benefits of campaigning via social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 221–223.
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 827–875.
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (1994). Mass media research: An introduction. Blemont, CA: Wadsworth.
Young, G. (2004). From broadcasting to narrowcasting to ‘mycasting’: A newfound celebrity in queer internet communities. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 18(1), 43–62.
Zacharias, U., & Arthurs, J. (2008). Introduction. Feminist Media Studies, 8(2), 197–223. doi:10.1080/14680770801980612.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gudelunas, D. There’s an App for that: The Uses and Gratifications of Online Social Networks for Gay Men. Sexuality & Culture 16, 347–365 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9127-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9127-4