Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Personal use, social supply or redistribution? cryptomarket demand on Silk Road 2 and Agora

  • Published:
Trends in Organized Crime Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2011, Silk Road became the first black market, or "cryptomarket", for illicit drugs. This study examines two of the largest cryptomarkets which have operated, Silk Road 2.0 and Agora Marketplace. We hypothesize that cryptomarkets cater to buyers who intend to resell or redistribute the products, specifically in the form of social drug dealing, and that larger quantities will be purchased on the cryptomarkets over time. We examine these hypotheses through a descriptive and qualitative assessment of the distribution of drugs sold, and an estimated trend line based on simple linear regression. Data was collected using a custom web crawler which was supplemented with a dataset collected by independent researcher Gwern Branwen, community members and researchers in total spanning the period from February 28th 2014 to April 2015. The observed demand was primarily for quantities intended for personal use or social drug dealing. The majority of sales fell within the lower price ranges, although a significant part of the revenue was generated in price ranges that suggested business-to-business dealing. Furthermore, we found that the sizes of the purchases decreased significantly in both the case of Silk Road 2.0 and Agora Marketplace. The results suggest that cryptomarkets resemble traditional drug markets in terms of the distribution and revenues. As such, it is relevant to include cryptomarkets in discussions about potential reductions of the harmful social consequences of drug markets, as well as in general discussions about drug markets and drug trafficking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Graph 1
Graph 2
Graph 3
Graph 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We have elsewhere discussed some best practices for web crawling, arguing that addressing four concerns contributes to the reliability of web crawling methodologies (Munksgaard et al. 2016): 1) error logging and quality assessment, 2) Validity checks, 3) peer-reviewed quality assessment, and 4) methodological skepticism and qualitative review. We address these by offering our raw data to other researchers on request, of which the most is already in the public domain (Branwen et al. 2015), thoroughly describing our treatment of data and by combining our study with a semi-qualitative coding, giving us a closer look at the data along with field observations on related forums. Unfortunately, Branwen’s crawls did not incorporate any form of error logging, though this was noted in our own crawl and pages were downloaded in case of errors. Our research traces observations back in time before a best methodological practice was agreed upon. As such we have to rely on well established, but less documented and checked, data. For further research the scientific community would benefit from relying on only the best possible methods of web crawling.

  2. After gathering usernames a hacker might try to guess the password of a vendor in order to access the account and bitcoins.

References

  • Aldridge J, Décary-Hétu D (2014) Not an'Ebay for Drugs': the Cryptomarket'Silk Road'as a paradigm shifting criminal innovation. Available at SSRN 2436643

  • Aldridge J, Décary-Hétu D (2015) A response to Dolliver’s evaluating drug trafficking on the tor network: silk road 2, the sequel. Policy, International Journal of Drug 26(11):1113–1123

  • Digital Citizens Alliance (2014) Busted, But Not Broken. The State of Silk Road and the Darknet Marketplaces. A Digital Citizens Alliance Investigative Report, Digital Citizens Alliance. Available via Digital Citizens Alliance. http://www.digitalcitizensalliance.org. Cited 30 November 2015

  • Association AS (2008) Code of ethics and policies and procedures of the ASA Committee on professional ethics. ASA Publications, Washington, DC

  • Atkyns RL, Hanneman GJ (1974) Illicit drug distribution and dealer communication behavior. J Health Soc Behav:36–43

  • Barratt MJ (2012) Silk road: eBay for drugs. Addiction 107(3):683–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt MJ et al. (2014) Use of silk road, the online drug marketplace, in the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States. Addiction 109(5):774–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björneborn L, Ingwersen P (2004) Toward a basic framework for webometrics. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 55(14):1216–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branwen, G., Christin, N, Décary-Hétu, D., Munksgaard, R, StExo, El Presidente, Anonymous, Daryl Lau, Sohhlz, Kratunov, D., Cakic, V., Van Buskirk, and Whom. (2015). Dark net market archives, 2011–2015, 2015. Retrieved 22nd January 2016 from www.gwern.net/Black-market%archives.

  • British Society of Criminology (2015). Statement of Ethics 2015. http://www.britsoccrim.org/new/docs/BSCEthics2015.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2015

  • Caulkins JP, Reuter P (2010) How drug enforcement affects drug prices. Crime and Justice 39(1):213–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christin N (2013) Traveling the silk road: a measurement analysis of a large anonymous online marketplace. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. International Journal of Drug Policy

  • Coomber R, Turnbull P (2007) Arenas of drug transactions: adolescent cannabis transactions in England—social supply. J Drug Issues 37(4):845–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Décary-Hétu D, Aldridge J (2015) Sifting through the net: monitoring of online offenders by researchers. The European Review of Organized Crime 2(2):122–141

    Google Scholar 

  • DeepDotWeb (2015a) Agora Market to Pause Operations. Finish Your Orders and Withdraw Money. 26 August 2015. Available via DeepDotWeb. https://www.deepdotweb.com/2015/08/26/agora-market-to-pause-operations-finish-your-orders-and-withdraw-money/. Cited 30 November 2015

  • DeepDotWeb (2015b) Evolution Marketplacet Exit Scam: Biggest Exit Scam Ever? 18 March 2015. Available via DeepDotWeb. https://www.deepdotweb.com/2015/03/18/evolution-marketplace-exit-scam-biggest-exist-scam-ever/. Cited 30 November 2015

  • Desroches FJ (2005) The crime that pays: drug trafficking and organized crime in Canada. Canadian Scholars’ Press, Toronto

  • Dolliver, D. S. (2015a). Evaluating drug trafficking on the tor network: silk road 2, the sequel. International Journal of Drug Policy.

  • Dolliver DS (2015b) A rejoinder to authors: data collection on tor. International Journal of Drug Policy 26(11):1128–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EMCDDA (2015) The internet and drug markets. Summary of results from an EMCDDA Trendspotter study. EMCDDA, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields AB (1984) “slinging weed” the social Organization of Streetcorner Marijuana Sales. J Contemp Ethnogr 13(2):247–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein J (2013) Arrest in U.S. Shuts Down a Black Market for Narcotics. New York Times 2 Oct 2013. Available via http://www.nytimes.com. Cited 30 November 2015

  • Greenberg A (2013) Meet the dread pirate Roberts, The Man Behind Booming Black Market Drug Website Silk Road. Forbes 2 September 2013. Available via Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/. Cited 30 November 2015

  • Jacques S, Wright R (2011) INFORMAL CONTROL and illicit drug trade *. Criminology 49(3):729–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvinen M, Ravn S (2011) From recreational to regular drug use: qualitative interviews with young clubbers. Sociology of health & illness 33(4):554–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BD et al. (1985) Taking care of business: the economics of crime by heroin abusers. Lexington Books Lexington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmer B, Pacula RL (2009) Estimating the size of the global drug market: a demand-side approach. A Report on Global Illicit Drug Markets 1998-2007:25

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboratory and Scientific Section (2003), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Vienna, Terminology and Information on Drugs, 2nd edition.

  • Lang D T and the CRAN Team (2015a). XML: Tools for Parsing and Generating XML Within R and S-Plus. R package version 3.98-1.3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=XML

  • Lang D T and the CRAN team (2015b). RCurl: General Network (HTTP/FTP/...) Client Interface for R. R package version 1.95–4.7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RCurl

  • Lavorgna A (2014) Internet-mediated drug trafficking: towards a better understanding of new criminal dynamics. Trends in organized crime 17(4):250–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J (2014a) Lost on the silk road: online drug distribution and the ‘cryptomarket’. Criminology and Criminal Justice 14(3):351–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J (2014b) Drugs on the dark net: how cryptomarkets are transforming the global trade in illicit drugs [kindle edition]. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

  • Munksgaard R, Demant J, Branwen G (2016) A replication and methodological critique of the study "evaluating drug trafficking on the tor network”. International Journal of Drug Policy, Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy S et al. (1990) Drifting into dealing: becoming a cocaine seller. Qual Sociol 13(4):321–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olston C, Najork M (2010) Web crawling. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 4(3):175–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter P (2009a) Systemic violence in drug markets. Crime, Law and Social Change 52(3):275–284

  • Reuter P (2009b) Ten years after the United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS): assessing drug problems, policies and reform proposals. Addiction 104(4):510–517

  • Soska, K. and N. Christin (2015) Measuring the Longitudinal Evolution of the Online Anonymous Marketplace Ecosystem. 24th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 15), USENIX Association.

  • Standifird SS (2001) Reputation and e-commerce: eBay auctions and the asymmetrical impact of positive and negative ratings. J Manag 27(3):279–295

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2005) World Drug Report 2005. UN Publication Sales. https://www.unodc.org/pdf/WDR_2005/volume_1_web.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2015

  • Van Buskirk J et al. (2014) The closure of the silk road: what has this meant for online drug trading? Addiction 109(4):517–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J et al. (2015) A response to Dolliver's “evaluating drug trafficking on the tor network”. International Journal of Drug Policy 26(11):1126–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hout MC, Bingham T (2013a) ‘silk road’, the virtual drug marketplace: a single case study of user experiences. International Journal of Drug Policy 24(5):385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hout MC, Bingham T (2013b) ‘surfing the silk road’: a study of users’ experiences. International Journal of Drug Policy 24(6):524–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hout MC, Bingham T (2014) Responsible vendors, intelligent consumers: silk road, the online revolution in drug trading. International Journal of Drug Policy 25(2):183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham H (2015). stringr: Simple, Consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations. R package version 1.0.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stringr

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakob Demant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demant, J., Munksgaard, R. & Houborg, E. Personal use, social supply or redistribution? cryptomarket demand on Silk Road 2 and Agora. Trends Organ Crim 21, 42–61 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-016-9281-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-016-9281-4

Keywords

Navigation