Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Fear of Counterterrorism: Surveillance and Civil Liberties Since 9/11

  • Global Society
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the post-9/11 era, claims can repeatedly be heard that counterterrorism and related surveillance practices involve illegitimate invasions of privacy, free speech, and other violations of civil liberties. This puzzling theme of a fear of surveillance is echoed in both the relevant scholarly literature and civil liberties activism. We analyze the contemporary discourse on surveillance and civil liberties in confrontation with reports on empirical cases of claims of abuse that are made against surveillance and intelligence activities. We argue that these civil liberties claims are not only a function of the incidence of actual violations, but are also a reflection of a civil liberties culture and an accompanying fear of counterterrorism and surveillance. Allegations of civil liberties violations in the post-9/11 era, therefore, do not have a wholly justified basis in the reality of surveillance practices, but should instead also be viewed as a manifestation of certain cultural sensitivities related to privacy rights and personal liberties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union). Website of the American Civil Liberties Union. Available online: http://www.aclu.org/.

  • ACLU. 2003. Justice Department Report Outlines Rights Violations Under PATRIOT. Available online: http://www.aclu.org/safefree/patriot/16802prs20030721.html.

  • Archibold, R. C. 2006. Wait Ends for Father and Son Exiled by FBI Terror Inquiry. The New York Times, 2 October, 10.

  • Armas, G. C. 2007. FBI chief: Patriot Act Ruling Misguided. NewsOK. November 7, 2007. Available online: http://newsok.com/fbi-chief-patriot-act-ruling-misguided/article/3165986#axzz2CPXCH02d.

  • Associated Press. 2006. ACLU Withdraws Lawsuit Challenging Patriot Act. The Washington Post, 29 October, A10.

  • Ball, K., Haggerty, K., & Lyon, D. (Eds.). 2012. Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. New York: Routledge.

  • Bowman, K., & Rugg, A. 2013. What Do Americans Think of NSA Surveillance? American Enterprise Institute, AEIdeas. Available online: http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/07/what-do-americans-think-of-nsa-surveillance/.

  • Browning, D. 2007. Judge Denies Terrorism Suspect’s Coercion Claim. Star Tribune, 6 June, 4B.

  • Contemporary Sociology. 2007. A Symposium on Surveillance Studies. Contemporary Sociology, 36(2), 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deflem, M. (Ed.). 2008. Surveillance and Governance: Crime Control and Beyond. Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deflem, M. 2010. The Policing of Terrorism: Organizational and Global Perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denniston, L. 2003. Arab Groups in US File Lawsuit Seeking to Curb Patriot Act. The Boston Globe, 31 July, A3.

  • Doherty, C. 2013. Balancing Act: National Security and Civil Liberties in Post-9/11 Era. Pew Research Center. Available online: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/06/07/balancing-act-national-security-and-civil-liberties-in-post-911-era/.

  • Dunér, B. 2005. Disregard for Security: The Human Rights Movement and 9/11. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17(1–2), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1893) 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.

  • EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) Website. The Electronic Frontier Foundation website. Available online: http://www.eff.org/.

  • Eggen, D. 2004a. Coalition Seeks FBI Files on Protest Groups. The Washington Post, 3 December, p. A03.

  • Eggen, D. 2004b. Key part of Patriot Act ruled unconstitutional. The Washington Post, 30 September, A16.

  • Eggen, D. 2005. Protesters Subjected to ‘Pretext Interviews’. The Washington Post, 18 May, A04.

  • Eggen, D. 2006. Retaliation Case of Arab Specialist at FBI Advances. The Washington Post, 18 July, A03.

  • EPIC Website. The Electronic Privacy Information Center website. Available online: http://epic.org/.

  • EPIC. 2002. Paying For Big Brother: A Review of the Proposed FY2003 Budget for The Department of Justice. EPIC website. Available online: http://epic.org/reports/paying_for_bb.pdf.

  • Factcheck.org. 2004. ACLU Ad on ‘Sneak-And-Peek’ Searches: Overblown. Available online: http://www.factcheck.org/aclu_ad_on_sneak-and-peek_searches_overblown.html.

  • Gallup. 2013. Civil liberties. Gallup website. Available online: http://www.gallup.com/poll/5263/civil-liberties.aspx. Accessed 10 July 2013.

  • Geli, E., & Perez, L. 2006. FBI Ends Use of Student Financial Files. USC Daily Trojan, 20 September.

  • Gharib, A. 2007. Al-Arian Remains in Prison, Despite Lack Of Guilty Verdict. Inter Press Service, 20 December.

  • Glater, J. D. 2006. Education Dept. Shared Student Data with the FBI. The New York Times, 1 September, 11.

  • Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. 2000. The Surveillant Assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. 2006. The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility. In K. D. Haggerty & R. V. Ericson (Eds.), The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility (pp. 3–25). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. 2003. F.B.I. is Accused of Bias by Arab-American Agent. The New York Times, 20 July, 16.

  • Kaye, J. 2007. Al-Arian Documentary Details Dismissed U. South Florida Professor. The Oracle (University of South Florida), 13 November.

  • Lichtblau, E. 2005a. FBI Watched Activist Groups, New Files Show. The New York Times, 20 December, 1.

  • Lichtblau, E. 2005b. FBI, Using Patriot Act, Demands Library’s Records. The New York Times, 26 August, 11.

  • Louwagie, P. 2006. Terrorism Suspect’s Lawyers Allege FBI Mishandling. Star Tribune, 5 April, 4B.

  • Lyon, D. 2003. Surveillance After September 11. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. 2007. Surveillance Studies: An Overview. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markon, J. 2010. FBI Probes were Improper, Justice Says. The Washington Post, 20 September.

  • McNamara, E. 2004. Random is All Relative. The Boston Globe, 9 June, B1.

  • New York Sun. 2008. Justice Department Taking Steps to Charge Sami Al-Arian. The New York Sun, 4 March, 4.

  • Newport, F. 2010. Nine Years after 9/11, Few See Terrorism As Top U.S. Problem. Gallup website. Available online: http://www.gallup.com/poll/142961/Nine-Years-Few-Terrorism-Top-Problem.aspx.

  • Newport, F. 2013. Americans Disapprove of Government Surveillance Programs. Gallup website. Available online: http://www.gallup.com/poll/163043/americans-disapprove-government-surveillance-programs.aspx.

  • Observingsurveillance.org. Observing Surveillance Project. Available online: http://observingsurveillance.org/.

  • Reza, H. G. 2006. On Behalf of Muslims, ACLU Seeks FBI Surveillance Data. The Los Angeles Times, 16 May, 4.

  • Saad, L. 2011. Americans’ Fear of Terrorism In U.S. is Near Low Point. Gallup website. Available online: http://www.gallup.com/poll/149315/Americans-Fear-Terrorism-Near-Low-Point.aspx.

  • Slater, D. 2007. FBI’s Abuse of PATRIOT Act even Worse than We Thought. Electronic Frontier Foundation website. Available online: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/06/fbis-abuse-patriot-act-even-worse-we-thought.

  • Solomon, J. 2007. Gonzales Knew About Violations, Officials Say. The Washington Post, 11 July, A03.

  • Troia, N. 2007. Law, Retaliation Doom Whistleblowers, Panelists Say. The First Amendment Center website. Available online: http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2006/060317-whisleblowers.htm.

  • US Department of Justice (DOJ): Office of the Inspector General (OIG) website. Special Reports. 2002–2012. Available online: http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/special.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathieu Deflem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deflem, M., McDonough, S. The Fear of Counterterrorism: Surveillance and Civil Liberties Since 9/11. Soc 52, 70–79 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9855-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9855-1

Keywords

Navigation