Abstract
Detection of genuine altruists could be a solution to the problem of subtle cheating. Brown et al. (Evol Psychol 1:42–69, 2003) found that humans could detect altruists using nonverbal cues. However, their experiments can be improved upon in several ways, and further investigation is needed to determine whether altruist-detection abilities are human universals. In our experiment, we used video clips of natural conversations as the stimulus. We asked a sample of Japanese undergraduates to rate their own level of altruism and then to estimate the videotaped targets’ altruism using the same scale. The perceivers were able to estimate the targets’ altruism levels accurately. Perceivers’ altruism score did not affect their ability to discriminate between altruists and non-altruists. Perceivers’ impressions of the altruist and non-altruist targets were also found to be different. Coding of nonverbal behavior of the targets revealed that altruists exhibited more “felt smiles” than non-altruists, which also supports the results of the previous study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barclay, P., & Lalumière, M. L. (2006). Do people differentially remember cheaters? Human Nature, 17, 98–113.
Brown, W. M., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 25–37.
Brown, W. M., & Moore, C. (2002). Smile asymmetries and reputation as reliable indicators of likelihood to cooperate: An evolutionary analysis. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in psychology research 11 (pp. 59–78). New York: Nova Science.
Brown, W. M., Palameta, B., & Moore, C. (2003). Are there nonverbal cues to commitment? An exploratory study using the zero-acquaintance video presentation paradigm. Evolutionary Psychology, 1, 42–69.
Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (eds). (1988). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford: Oxford Science.
Chiappe, D., Brown, A., Dow, B., Koontz, J., Rodriguez, M., & McCulloch, K. (2004). Cheaters are looked at longer and remembered better than cooperators in social exchange situations. Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 108–120.
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187–276.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52–64.
Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotional recognition: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 203–235.
Frank, R. H. (1988). Passion within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: Norton.
Johnson, R. C., Danko, G. P., Darvill, T. J., Bochner, S., Bowers, J. K., Huang, Y.-H., et al. (1989). Cross-cultural assessment of altruism and its correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 855–868.
Mealy, L., Daood, C., & Krage, M. (1996). Enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 119–128.
Mehl, B., & Buchner, A. (2008). No enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 35–41.
Mehu, M., Grammer, K., & Dunbar, R. (2007). Smiles when sharing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 415–422.
Oda, R. (1997). Biased face recognition in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 309–315.
Oda, R., Hiraishi, K., & Matsumoto-Oda, A. (2006). Does an altruist-detection cognitive mechanism function independently of a cheater-detection cognitive mechanism? Studies using Wason selection tasks. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 366–380.
Ohashi, M., Nagato, K., Hirabayashi, S., Yoshida, T., Hayashi, F., Tsumura, T., et al. (1976). Assumed relationship between physiognomic features and personality traits. Examining the difference between rating scores of stimulus persons composing counterparts. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Psychology, 23, 11–25. in Japanese with English abstract.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–55.
Vanneste, S., Verplaetse, J., Van Hiel, A., & Braeckman, J. (2007). Attention bias toward noncooperative people: a dot probe classification study in cheating detection. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 272–276.
Verplaetse, J., Vanneste, S., & Braeckman, J. (2007). You can judge a book by its cover: the sequel. A kernel of truth in predictive cheating detection. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 260–271.
Yamagishi, T., Tanida, S., Mashima, R., Shimoma, E., & Kanazawa, S. (2003). You can judge a book by its cover: evidence that cheaters may look different from cooperators. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 290–301.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Hiroki Ozono for his advice. This research was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), 19500225, 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oda, R., Yamagata, N., Yabiku, Y. et al. Altruism Can Be Assessed Correctly Based on Impression. Hum Nat 20, 331–341 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-009-9070-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-009-9070-8