Skip to main content
Log in

Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles

Replication in a population presumed to have high paternity certainty

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gaulin, McBurney, and Brakeman-Wartell (1997) found that college students reported both matrilateral and sex biases in the investment of aunts and uncles (aunts invested more than uncles). They interpreted the matrilateral bias as a consequence of paternity uncertainty. We replicated that study with Orthodox Jewish college students, selected because they come from a population we presume to have higher paternity certainty than the general population. The Orthodox sample also showed matrilateral and sex biases. Comparing the two data sets, the Orthodox sample reported more investment, and slightly less matrilateral and sex biases, but the differences were not statistically significant. We did find an interaction between sex of relative and group membership, resulting from greater investment by Orthodox uncles. We interpret the results as reflecting the operation of a facultative investment mechanism whose upper limit is tuned to the maximum levels of paternity certainty found in ancestral environments. Lack of a difference in matrilateral bias between groups may result from levels of paternity certainty near to, or above, that maximum in both groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, R. R., and M. A. Bellis 1995 Human Sperm Competition. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biale, R. 1984 Women and Jewish Law: An Exploration of Women’s Issues in Halakhic Sources. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boster J. S., R. R. Hudson, and S. J. C. Gaulin 1998 High Paternity Certainties of Jewish Priests. American Anthropologist 100:967–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creda-Flores, R. M., S. A. Barton, L. F. Marty-Gonzales, L. F. Rivas F., and R. Chakraborty 1999 Estimation of Nonpaternity in the Mexican Population of Nuevo Leon: A Validation Study with Blood Group Markers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 109:281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donin, H. H. 1972 To be a Jew. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euler, H., and B. Weitzel 1996 Discriminative Grandparental Solicitude as Reproductive Strategy. Human Nature 7:39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euler, H. A., s. Hoier, and P. A. Rohde 2001 Relationship-Specific Closeness of Intergenerational Family Ties: Findings from Evolutionary Psychology and Implications for Models of Cultural Transmission. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32:147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., D. H. McBurney, and S. L. Brakeman-Wartell 1997 Matrilateral Biases in the Investment of Aunts and Uncles. Human Nature 8:139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. L. 2000 Being Jewish. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartung, J. 1985 Matrilineal Inheritance: New Theory and Analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8:661–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoier, S., H. A. Euler, and M. Hänze 2001 Diskriminative Fürsorglichkeit von Tanten und Onkeln: Eine empirische Untersuchung aus evolutionspsychologischer Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 22:205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, D. G., L. L. Kupper, and K. E. Miller 1988 Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods. Boston: PWS-Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manolson G. 1997 Outside/Inside: A Fresh Look at Tzniut. Southfield, Michigan: Targum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashos, A. 2000 Does Paternal Uncertainty Explain Discriminative Grandparental Solicitude? A Cross-Cultural Study in Greece and Germany. Evolution and Human Behavior 21:97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasse, G., H. Muller, R. Chakraborty, and J. Ott 1994 Estimating the Frequency of Nonpaternity in Switzerland. Human Heredity 44:337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skorecki K., S. Sellg, S. Blazer, R. Bradman, N. Bradman, P. J. Waburton, M. Ismajlowicz, and M. F. Hammer 1997 Y Chromosomes of Jewish Priests. Nature 385:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, B., and C. Irven 2000 Surnames and the Y Chromosome. American Journal of Human Genetics 66:1417–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald H. McBurney.

Additional information

Donald McBurney is a professor of psychology at the University of Pittsburgh. His principal interest is in the psychophysics of taste and smell. Current research concerns sensory adaptation as an evolutionary adaptation, with a focus on long-term adaptation to chili peppers.

Jessica Simon conducted this study as her undergraduate honors thesis at the University of Pittsburgh. She is currently pursuing graduate work.

Steven Gaulin is a professor of anthropology and psychology at the University of Pittsburgh. Trained at UC Berkeley and Harvard, his research focuses on the intersection of sexual selection and evolutionary psychology. He is author, with Donald McBurney, of Psychology: An Evolutionary Approach.

Allan Geliebter is a psychologist at St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital, the University Hospital of Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and the Department of Psychology, Touro College, New York City. His research concerns food intake and obesity in humans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McBurney, D.H., Simon, J., Gaulin, S.J.C. et al. Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles. Hum Nat 13, 391–402 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-002-1022-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-002-1022-5

Key words

Navigation