Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disciplinary Duality: The Contested Terrain of Book Studies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Publishing Research Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Book Studies is an emerging field, which encompasses Book History and Book Arts. Because of this duality it is not always clear whether it is a free-standing discipline or merely an interdisciplinary academic program. This article attempts to investigates its disciplinary identity through an in-depth analysis of Book Studies' history, discursive field, major stakeholders, and scholarly communications. In addition, the article identifies and explores a few major academic programs in Book Studies in the United States and abroad. Based on the evidence gathered from the syllabi of the academic programs and the scholarly communication of the participants, some of the implications of the article are: the discursive field of Book Studies is developing around two very different centers, Book History and Book Arts; Book Studies’ acquired dual disciplinary identity is not a “birth defect” but rather a goal of including sociocultural, historic and aesthetic aspects of the book. The potential future of Book Studies as a field is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frost G. 2000. “Invisible infrastructure of book studies.” Future of the book, reports. [retrieved January 31, 2006]. Available from http://www.futureofthebook.com/stories/storyReader$77

  2. Becher T, Trowler P. Academic tribes and territories. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Readings B. The University in Ruins. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rose J. The horizon of a new discipline: inventing book studies. Publishing Res Quart 2003;19(1):11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapman H. Becoming academics: challenging the disciplinarians. In: Breaking the disciplines: reconceptions in knowledge, art and culture. New York: I.B. Tauris; 2003.

  6. Prior P. Resituating the discourse community: a sociohistoric perspective. In: Writing/disciplinarity: a sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. London: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1998.

  7. The University of Iowa. “Programs.” The University of Iowa Center for the Book. [retrieved January 31, 2006]. Available from http://www.uiowa.edu/∼ctrbook/links/index.html

  8. Drew University. Modern history and literature. [retrieved May 5, 2006]. Available from http://depts.drew.edu/gsdean/histg/

  9. Rare Book School at The University of Virginia. [retrieved May 5, 2006]. Available from http://www.virginia.edu/oldbooks/2006/index.php

  10. The University of Reading. Department of Typography & Graphic Communication. Centre for Writing, Publishing and Printing History. [retrieved April 22, 2006]. Available from http://www.rdg.ac.uk/AcaDepts/lt/home.html?centres/cwpph/index.html

  11. Camberwell College of Arts. Courses. [retrieved April 22, 2006]. Available from http://www.camberwell.arts.ac.uk/11008.htm

  12. American Library Association (ALA). Banks Harris Award. [retrieved May 6, 2006]. Available from http://www.ala.org/ala/alcts/newslinks/newsPR/PRsmarch2006/BH06.htm

  13. Drew University. Professor Jonathan Rose Faculty Page. [retrieved April 22, 2006]. Available from http://depts.drew.edu/hist/jrose.html

  14. “Drew University Professor Jonathan Rose Wins NJCH Humanities Book Award.” Atlantic Highlands Herald. [updated September 5, 2002; retrieved May 6, 2006]. Available from http://www.ahherald.com/2002/ahh020905.htm#11

  15. Davies M. On the concept of an ecology of knowledge. In: Breaking the disciplines: reconceptions in knowledge, art, and culture. New York: I.B. Tauris; 2003.

  16. Frost G. Reading by hand: the Haptic evaluation of artists’ books. Bonefolder 2005;2(1):3–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Slavic Librarian, Miami University, Room 215, King Library, Oxford, OH, 45056, USA

    Masha Stepanova

Authors
  1. Masha Stepanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masha Stepanova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stepanova, M. Disciplinary Duality: The Contested Terrain of Book Studies. Pub Res Q 23, 105–115 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-007-9018-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-007-9018-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation