Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching, research, and service: Expectations of assistant professors

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we critically evaluate the expectations of assistant professors as perceived by junior and senior faculty (n=22) across seven disciplines at two universities. Our research shows that there are similarities and differences within Sociology departments, across disciplines, and across the teaching and research schools where we collected our data. In one respect, Sociology is no different than the other departments where we interviewed faculty members—ambiguity abounds in terms of expectations for junior faculty. Scholarship expectations for tenure and promotion to associate professor vary much more greatly across rank, discipline, and institution than do those for teaching or service. Based on our findings, we offer several suggestions for improving the transition to the role of Assistant Professor in Sociology. Our suggestions focus on change within graduate programs, hiring institutions, and Sociology as a discipline. While our results are consistent with prior research in many cases, we note that the generalizability of our findings is limited given the number of interviews conducted and the purposive sampling design utilized. However, we hope that our results will provide additional information that may help others as they prepare to begin their roles as assistant professors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abouserie, R. 1996. “Stress, Coping Strategies, and Job Satisfaction in University Academic Staff.” Educational Psychology 16(1): 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Sociological Association. 2002. “Majority of New PhDs Have Tenure Track Jobs Four Years Later.” Footnotes 30(2). http://www.asanet.org/footnotes/feb02/fn9.html

  • Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2000. “A Profile of Future Faculty: Data from the National Research Council.” Diversity Digest Fall: 7.

  • Ault, B. 1996. “Structure of Graduate Student Failure: A View from Within.” The American Sociologist 27(3): 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, G.W., and Bird, G.A. 1987. “In Pursuit of Academic Careers: Observations and Reflections of a Dual-Career Couple.” Family Relations 36: 97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. 1992. The New Faculty Member: Supporting and Fostering Professional Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000. Advice for New Faculty Members. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. 1987. The Academic Profession. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. “Small Worlds, Different Worlds: The Uniquenesses and Troubles of American Academic Professions.” Daedalus 126(4): 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. 1997. “Conference Life: The Rough Guide.” The American Sociologist 28(3): 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotten, S.R., Price, J., Keeton, S., Burton, R.P.D., and Clifford Wittekind, J.E. 2001. “The Academic Job Search in Sociology: A Personal Account and Analysis.” The American Sociologist 32(3): 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. 2002. New Faculty Discuss Academic Job Searching. American Sociological Association.

  • Darley, M. I, and Zanna, M.P. 1987. The Compleat Academic: A Practical Guide for the Beginning Social Scientist. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denecke, D. (PFF Program Manager) and the PFF National Office Staff at CGS. 2002. “Report of the PFF Complementarity Meeting.” The Communicator, Council of Graduate Schools 35(8): 1–2, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneef, A.L., and Goodwin, CD. 1995. The Academic’s Handbook. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R.M. 1995. Preparing for Promotion and Tenure Review: A Faculty Guide. American Sociological Association.

  • Doyle, C, and Hind, P. 1998. “Occupational Stress, Burnout and Job Status in Female Academics.” Gender, Work and Organization 5(2): 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D.S., and Zaremba, S.B. 1997. “Thriving at Liberal Arts Colleges: The More ‘Compleat Academic’.” Teaching of Psychology 24(1): 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, W. 2000. “Race, Gender, and Faculty Work Lives: Data from the University of Michigan.” Diversity Digest Fall: 3-16.

  • Frongia, T. 1995. “Active Mentorship in Scholarly Publishing: Why, What, Who, How.” In J.M. Moxley and L.T. Lenker (Eds.), The Politics and Processes of Scholarship (pp. 217–230). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J.G. 2002. “Preparing Future Faculty and Doctoral Education.” Change. 34(6): 63–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • -, Pruitt-Logan, A.S., Weibl, R.A. and Participants in the Preparing Future Faculty Program. 2000. Building the Faculty We Need: Colleges and Universities Working Together. Association of American Colleges and Universities and the Council of Graduate Schools.

  • Gaff, J.G., Pruitt-Logan, A.S., Sims, L.B., and Denecke, D.D. 2003. Preparing Future Faculty in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A Guide for Change. American Association of Colleges and Universities.

  • Garcia, M. 2001. Succeeding in an Academic Career: A Guide for Faculty of Color. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1983. Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C.M. and Dore, T.M. 2001. At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Today’s Doctoral Students Reveal about Doctoral Education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P.J. 1997. “Public Universities as Academic Workplaces.” Daedalus 126(4): 113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammel, E.A., Mason, C, and Prater, A. 1995. “Gender and the Academic Career in North American Anthropology: Differentiating Intramarket from Extramarket Bias.” Current Anthropology 36: 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiberger, M.M., and Vick, J.M. 1992. The Academic Job Search Handbook. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. 2004. “The Story Is Not in the Numbers: Academic Socialization and Diversifying the Faculty.” NWSA Journal 16(1): 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. 1995. “Preparing Future Faculty for Unfamiliar Teaching Settings—A Process in Need of Revision.” Journal of College Science Teaching 25(1): 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, S. 1993. “Gender Differences in Academic Career Paths of Economists.” The American Economic Review 83: 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. 1980. “Quality of Work Life and Work Behavior in Academia.” National Forum 60(4): 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, B., and Moore, H.A. 1995. “Training Sociologists: An Assessment of Professional Socialization and the Emergence of Career Aspirations.” Teaching Sociology 23(3): 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P.T. and PR. Trowler. 1999. “It Takes a Village to Raise a Child: Mentoring and the Socialisation of New Entrants to the Academic Professions.” Mentoring and Tutoring 7(1): 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G.L. 1990. “The Compleat Advisor.” National Academic Advising Association Journal 10(1): 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, F.J. and Sheehan, B.A. 1997. “Job Satisfaction among Academic Staff: An International Perspective.” Higher Education 34(3): 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loscocco, K., Crutchfield, R., Roy, W, Becker, G., Christiano, K., and Hatch, L.R. 1996. Teaching Graduate Students to Teach Sociology. Report of the Ad Hoc Graduate Education Committee, American Sociological Association.

  • Mahaffy, K. 2000. Preparing Graduate Students to Teach, Third Edition. Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, G.T. 1997. “Of Methods and Manners for Aspiring Sociologists: 37 Moral Imperatives.” The American Sociologist 28(1): 102–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, L.B. 1992. “Assistant Professor: Paranoid or Self-Preserving?” The Counseling Psychologist 20: 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. 1998. The Focus Group Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, C.A., and Forbes, S.A. 2000. “Untenured Faculty: Issues of Transition, Adjustment, and Mentorship.” Mentoring and Tutoring 8(1): 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerad, M. and Cerney, J. 2000. “Improving Doctoral Education: Recommendations from the Ph.D.s—Ten Years Later Study.” The Communicator (Council of Graduate Schools Newsletter) Vol. 33(2): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, T. and Einwohner, R.L. 2001. “Forming and Transforming the Teaching Self in Different Institutional Environments: Two Teachers’ Experiences.” Teaching Sociology 29(4): 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, B. and McCann, L.E.I. 1996. Recruiting Good College Faculty: Practical Advice for a Successful Search. Anker Publishing Company.

  • Piker-King, K., Kain, E.L., Roberts, K.A., and Weiss, G.L. 2001. Applying for a Faculty Position in a Teaching-Oriented Institution. American Sociological Association.

  • Price, 1, Cotten, S.R., Keeton, S., Burton, R.P.D., and Clifford Wittekind, J.E. 2002. New Faculty Discuss the First Year as an Assistant Professor. American Sociological Association.

  • Price, J., Cotten, S.R., Keeton, S., Burton. R.P.D., and Clifford Wittekind, J.E. 2002. New Faculty Discuss The First Year As An Assistant Professor. American Sociological Association.

  • Price, Jammie, Shelia R. Cotten, Shirley Keeton, Russell P.D. Burton, and Janice E. Clifford Wittekind. 2002. New Faculty Discuss The First Year as an Assistant Professor. American Sociological Association.

  • Rheingold, H.L. 1994. The Psychologist’s Guide to an Academic Career. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R. 2000. “Techniques to Identify Themes.” Field Methods 15: 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, A., Dugoni, B., Hoffer, T., and Selfa, L. 1999. Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities: Summary Report 1998. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R.M., Prichard, K.W., and Hostetler, K.D. (eds). 1992. The Art and Politics of College Teaching: A Practical Guide for the Beginning Professor. New York: Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldin, P. 1997. The Teaching Portfolio: A Practical Guide to Improved Performance Promotion/Tenure Decisions (Second Edition). American Sociological Association.

  • Sheridan, H.W. 1988. “The Compleat Professor, Jr.” American Association for Higher Education Bulletin 41(4): 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, D., and Silver, I. 2003. “The Business of Becoming a Professional Sociologist: Unpacking the Informal Training of Graduate School.” The American Sociologist 34(3): 56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • -, 2004. “Implicit Versus Explicit Professional Training in Sociology.” Footnotes, December, http://www.asanet.org/footnotes/dec04/fn8.html

  • Smart, J.C. 1990. “A Causal Model of Faculty Turnover Intentions.” Research in Higher Education 31(5): 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorcinelli, M.D. 1994. “Effective Approaches to New Faculty Development.” Journal of Counseling and Development 72: 474–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalter-Roth, R., Thomas, J., and Levine, F.J. 2000. New Doctorates in Sociology: Professions Inside and Outside the Academy. American Sociological Association Research Program on the Discipline and Profession, Research Brief.

  • Steinpreis, R.E., Ritzke, D., and Anders, K.A. 1999. “The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study.” Sex Roles 41(7/8): 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. 1996. “Gendered Cultures and Performance Appraisal: The Experience of Women Academics.” Gender, Work, and Organization 3(3): 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W.G. 1997. “Organizational Socialization in Higher Education.” Journal of Higher Education 68(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, and Bensimon, E.M. 1996. Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and Rhoads, R.A. 1994. Enhancing Promotion, Tenure and Beyond: Faculty Socialization as a Cultural Process. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, E.M. and Turner, C.G. 1986. “Dual Career Academic Couples: Analysis of Problems and a Proposal for Change.” Women and Politics 6(3): 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P.P., Pereira, A., and Valentine, D. 2002. “Perceptions of New Social Work Faculty about Mentoring Experiences.” Journal of Social Work Education 38(2): 317–333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Price, J., Cotten, S.R. Teaching, research, and service: Expectations of assistant professors. Am Soc 37, 5–21 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-006-1011-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-006-1011-y

Keywords

Navigation