Abstract
Michael Burawoy’s call for a public sociology disciplined by professional and policy sociology, on the one side, and driven by critical sociology, on the other, exposes the ideological biases of sociology to publics. In so doing, public sociology will thwart non-ideological efforts for sociology to exert influence on broader publics and on political decision-makers. In order for sociology to be able to influence public opinion and the decisions of key players in the political and economic arenas, it will need to earn respect through a long evolutionary process of careful research and explanation without ideological fervor. To expose the ideological biases of sociology will thwart this evolutionary process. In contrast, sociology would be much better to develop an engineering mentality in addressing issues, problems, and concerns of publics in present-day societies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, A. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Burawoy, M. 2004a. “Manifesto for Public Sociologies.” Social Problems 51: 124–130.
—. 2004b. “Introduction.” Social Problems 51: 103–106.
—. 2004c. “Public Sociologies: Contradictions, Dilemmas, and Possibilities.” Social Forces 82: 1613–1626.
—. 2005. “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review 70: 4–28.
-, and Van Antwerpen, J. 2001. “Public Sociology at Berkeley: Past, Present and Future.” Unpublished paper.
Cole, S. 2001. What's Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Habermas, J. 1981/1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Two volumes. Boston: Beacon.
Horowitz, I.L. 1993. The Decomposition of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Massey, D. 2005. Presentation in Centennial Session: Assessing Scientific Basis of American Sociology, American Sociological Association meetings, August, Philadelphia, PA.
—, and Denton, N.A. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
—, Durand, J., and Malone, N.J. 2002. Beyond Smoke and Mirrors: Mexican Immigration in an Era of Economic Integration. New York: Russell Sage.
Mills, C.W. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Riesman, D., et al. 1950. The Lonely Crowd. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Turner, J.H. 1972. American Society: Problems of Structure. New York: Harper and Row.
—. 1977. Social Problems in America. New York: Harper and Row.
—. 1985. American Dilemmas. New York: Columbia University Press.
—. 1989. “The Disintegration of American Sociology.” Sociological Perspectives 32: 419–433.
—. 1998. “Must Sociological Theory and Practice Be So Far Apart?” Sociological Perspectives 41: 133–162.
-. 2001. “Social Engineering: Is This Really as Bad as It Sounds? Sociological Practice.
—, and Starnes, C. 1976. Inequality: Privilege and Poverty in America. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing.
Turner, S., and Turner, J.H. 1990. The Impossible Science. Newbury Park: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, J.H. ”Is public sociology such a good idea?”. Am Soc 36, 27–45 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-005-1015-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-005-1015-z