Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The quality of life concept in sociology

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An interdisciplinary concept, quality of life (QOL) has gained prominence in research in psychology, marketing, and several other disciplines. What is its status in sociology? Arising out of the social indicators“movement,” QOL has gained attention as both objective and subjective measures. Precursors of the concept figured in sociological research in the 1930s on level and plane of living. Now, it is recognized in one sociological encyclopedia, a textbook, and a few sociological monographs, but otherwise has gained little coinage in general sociology. One social problems text has adopted it as an organizing theme. With these modest inroads, the components of QOL, such as inequality, income, crime, the environment, etc., always have been prominent in sociology. When QOL is recognized in theory and when legislatures require its use in evaluation of public programs, the concept will become established in sociological research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abnorn, Murray. 1983.“Recollections and Views of Key Figures in the Social Indicators Program.” Items 37 (4).

  • Albrecht, Gary and Ray Fitzpatrick. 1994.“A Sociological Perspective on Health-Related Quality of Life Research,” in Gary L. Albrecht and Ray Fitzpatrick (eds.), Advances in Medical Sociology, Quality of Life in Health Care, Volume V: 1-21. Greenwich, CT and London, England: AJI Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Frank M. 1989.“The Evolution of a Movement,” Journal of Public Policy 9 (4): 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Frank M. and S.B. Withey. 1967. Social Indicators of'Well-Being: American 's Perceptions of Life Quality, New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Raymond A. 1966. Social Indicators, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel, 1969.“The Idea of a Social Report,” The Public Interest 15: 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiger, Ronald L. 1995.“Social Structure and Phenomenology of Attainment, Annual Review of Sociology1 21: 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., P.E. Converse, and W.L. Rogers. 1976. The Quality of American Life, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, Theodore, Howard M. Bahr, John Modell, and Bruce A. Chadwick. 1991. Recent Social Trends in the United States, 1960-1990, Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F. Stuart. 1933. The Measurement of Social Status by the Use of the Social Status Scale 1933, Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, Howard R. 1941.“Methods of Measuring Level of Living, Social Participation and Adjustment of Ohio Farm People,” Methodological Supplement to the Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 624, Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University and Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, July. (Mineo.)

    Google Scholar 

  • —and A.R. Mangus. 1942.“Standard of Living: An Empirical Test of a Definition,” Rural Sociology 7 (4): 395–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, Anne et al. 2001.“Reconceptualization of Social Quality,” European Journal of Social Quality 3 (1-2): 118–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferriss, Abbott L. 1979.“The U.S. Federal Effort in Developing Social Indicators,” Social Indicators Research 6 (2): 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989.“Whatever Happened, Indeed!” The Journal of Public Policy 9 (4): 413–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firebaugh, Glenn. 2000.“The Trend in Between-Nation Income Inequality,” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Ray. 1996.“Alternative Approaches to the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life,” in Avner Offer (ed.), In Pursuit of the Quality of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 140–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, Duncan. 1996.“The Quality of Employment: Perspectives and Problems,” in Avner Offer (ed.), In Pursuit of the Quality of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, Jonathan, and Brendan Halpin. 1996.“Time Use, Quality of Life, and Process Benefits,” in Avner Offer (ed.), In Pursuit of the Quality of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 188–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, Elihu M. 1976.“On ‘Quality of Life’,” American Sociological Review 41: 793–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giner, Salvader et al. 1998. Diccionario de Sociologia, Madrid: Alanza Ed, SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Bertram M. 1967.“Goals and Indicators of American Society,” vol. I, The Annals 371 (May); and, vol. II, The Annals 373.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. and Michael Springer. 1970.“Political Intelligence for America's Future,” The Annals 388.

  • Hagood, Margret Jarman, Nadia Danilevsky, and Corlin O. Beum, 1941.“An Examination of the Use of Factor Analysis in the Problem of Subregional Delineation,” Rural Sociology 6 (3): 216–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, Michael. 2000.“Agenda for Sociology at the Start of the Twenty-First Century,” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 697–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandes, Donald J. 1993. America's Children, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Alan G. 2002. Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology, 2nd Ed., Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. 2000.“Social Indicators,” in Edgar F. Borgatta and Rhonda J.V. Montgomery, (Eds). Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2nd ed., NY: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, Robert H. 1978. Social Problems and the Quality of Life, Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown Co. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B.C. 1976. Quality of Life Indicators in U. S. Metropolitan Areas, New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lively, C.E. and R.B. Almack, 1938.“AMethod of Determining Rural Social Sub-areas with Application to Ohio,” Columbus: Ohio State University and Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Rural Economics Memorandum Bulletin No. 106.

  • Markides, Kyriakos S. 2000.“The Quality of Life,” in Edgar F. Borgatta and Rhonda J. V. Montgomery, (eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology (second edition), New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKain, Jr., Walter C. 1939.“The Concept of Plane of Living and the Construction of Plane of Living Index,” Rural Sociology 4: 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, Sara. 2000.“Family, State, and Child Weil-Being,” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 703–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Ian, 1985. Social Indicators for Human Development, London: Frances Pinter, Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Wilbert E. and Eleanor Bernert Sheldon. 1965.“Monitoring Social Change: A Conceptual and Programmatic Statement,” Washington: Social Statistics, Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, pp. 1944–1949.

  • Mukherjee, Ramkrishna. 1989. The Quality of Life: Valuation in Social Research, New Delhi/Newbury Park/London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, Daniel S., and Kenneth C. Land. 1993.“Age, Criminal Careers, and Population Heterogeneity: Specification and Estimation of a Nonparametric, Mixed Poisson Model,” Criminology 31: 327–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Technology, Automation and Economic Progress. 1966. Report of the Commission. Washington, DC: GPO, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, Alice. 2000.“Poverty Research and Policy for the Post-Welfare Era,” Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, Howard W. 1936. Southern Regions of the United States, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogburn, William E. 1933. Recent Social Trends in the United States, Report of the President's Commission on Social Trends, 2 vols., New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur. 1969.“The Plan and Purpose of a Social Report,” The Public Interest, 15: 85–97, (spring).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panel on Social Indicators, DHEW, 1969. Toward a Social Report, Washington, DC: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parke, Robert. 1983.“Recollections and Views of Key Figures in the Social Indicators Program.” Items 37 (4).

  • President's Commission on National Goals. 1960. Goals for Americans, New York: The American Assembly, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, Kenneth. 1983.“Council Reorganizes Its Work in Social Indicators,” Items 37 (4).

  • Rockwell, Richard C. 1983.“Social Indicators at the Council,” Items 37 (1).

  • Schussler, K.F. and G.A. Fisher. 1985.“Quality of Life Research and Sociology,” Annual Review of Sociology 11:139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, William H. 1940. The Construction and Standardization of a Scale for the Measurement of the Socioeconomic Status of Oklahoma Farm Families, Technical Bulletin No. 9, Stillwater, Oklahoma: Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, Eleanor Bernert. 1983.“Recollections and Views of Key Figures in the Social Indicators Program,” Items 37 (4).

  • Sheldon, Eleanor Bernert and Wilbert E. Moore. 1968. Indicators of Social Change, Concepts and Measurements, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skees, Jerry R. and Louis E. Swanson. 1988.“Farm Structure and Local Society Weil-Being in the South,” pp. 141–157 in Lionel. J. Beaulieu, (ed.), The Rural South in Crisis, Boulder and London: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taeuber, Conrad. 1978.“America in the Seventies: Some Social Indicators,” The Annals 435 (January).

  • Thomas, Melvin E., and Michael Hughes, 1986.“The Continuing Significance of Race: A Study of Race, Class, and Quality of Life in America, 1972-1985,” American Sociological Review 51: 830–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickamyer, Ann R. and Cynthia M. Duncan. 1990.“Poverty and Opportunity Structure in Rural America,” Annual Review of Sociology 16: 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1981. Social Indicators III, Washington: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Office of Management and Budget. 1974. Social Indicators, 1973, Washington: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1976. Social Indicators, 1976, Washington, DC: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, Daniel, 1981.“New Rules in American Life: Searching for Self-fulfillment in a World Turned Upside Down,” Psychology Today 15 (4): 35–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferriss, A.L. The quality of life concept in sociology. Am Soc 35, 37–51 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-004-1016-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-004-1016-3

Keywords

Navigation