Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Canadian rejoinder: Sociology north and south of the border

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In response to the recent The American Sociologist special issue on Canadian sociology, this rejoinder dialogues with some of the perspectives offered there on the discipline north of the border with an eye towards lessons that American sociologists might learn from the Canadian experience. My reflections build on a larger analytic piece entitled “Canada’s Impossible Science: The Historical and Institutional Origins of the Coming Crisis of Anglo-Canadian Sociology” to be published soon in The Canadian Journal Sociology. Particular attention is paid to the different institutional arrangements of higher education in Canada and the United States, Anglo-Canadian reliance on the particularly English “weakness as strength” strategy for sociology, tensions between the cultural values of populism, egalitarianism, and excellence, and the trade-offs between professional and public intellectual work. A critique is offered of the “origin myth” of Canadian sociology as a particularly vibrant “critical sociology,” with discussion of Dorothy Smith's influence on sociology in Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. “The Disciplines and the Future,” in Steven Brint (ed), The Future of the Intellect: The Changing American University Stanford: Stanford University Press, 205–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, Phillip 1968. The Origins of British Sociology: 1834–1914, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Michael. 1997. Sex in the Snow: Canadian Social Values at the End of the Millennium. Toronto: Penguin Books Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, Robert. 1998. The Craft of Inquiry: Methods, Theories and Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, Doug, Edward Grabb, and William Johnston. 1990. “The Values of Canadians and Americans: A Critical Analysis and Reassessment.” Social Forces 68 (3): 693–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. “National Character, Regional Culture and the Values of Canadians and Americans,” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 30 (1): 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S and William C. Rau. 2001. “Sociology in the 1990s,” Cole, Stephen (editor). 2001. What's Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter. 2001. “Sociology: A Disinvitation?” Cole, Stephen (editor). 2001. What's Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984a. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984b. Homo Academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, Steven.1994. In an Age of Experts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brym, Robert J. 2002. “An Introduction to the Upper Thirteen,” The American Sociologist 33 (1): 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2003. “The Decline of the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association,” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 28(3): 411–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brym, Robert. J with Bonnie Fox. 1989. From Culture to Power: The Sociology of English Canada.

  • Buxton, William and Stephen P. Turner. 1992. “From Education to Expertise: Sociology as a Profession,” in Halliday, Terence C. and Morris Janowitz. (eds). Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 373–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, Craig. 1992. “Sociology, Other Disciplines, and the Project of a General Understanding of Social Life,” in Halliday, Terence C. and Morris Janowitz. (eds). 1992. Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 137–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, Daniel. 1989. “The Mundanity of Excellence: An Ethnographic Report on Stratification and Olympic Swimmers.” Sociological Theory 7 (1): 70–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, Wallace. 2001. “Canadian Political Economy's Legacy for Sociology,” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 26 (3): 405–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, Wallace and John Myles. 1994. Relations of Ruling: Class and Gender in Post-Industrial Societies. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Stephen (editor). 2001a. What's Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001b. “Why Sociology Doesn't Make Progress Like the Natural Sciences,” in Cole, Stephen (editor). 2001. What's Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. “Why the Social Sciences Won't Become High-Consensus, Rapid-Discovery Science,” Cole, Stephen (editor). 2001. What's Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, Jeffrey. 2002. “Nationalism, Activism, and Canadian Sociology,” The American Sociologist 33 (1): 12–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2004a. “The Impact of Movements: Bureaucratic Insurgency, Canadianization and the CSAA.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 41 (2): 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2004b. The Canadianization Movement. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis. 1965. Men of Ideas: A Sociologist's View. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1984. Refugee Scholars in America: Their Impact and Their Experiences. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocté, Jean-Fançios and Daniel Dagenais. 2002. “Dialectical Sociology in Quebec: About and Around Michel Freitag's Dialectique et Société’” The American Sociologist 33 (2): 40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, Bruce and Lorna Weir, 2002. “The Succession Question in English Canadian Sociology,” Society! Société. Oct.

  • Crane, Diana and Henry Small. 1992. “American Sociology since the Seventies: The Emerging Identity Crisis in the Discipline,” Halliday, Terence C. and Morris Janowitz. (editors). Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 197–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Scott. 1995. “Leaps of Faith: Shifting Currents in Critical Sociology of Education,” American Journal of Sociology 100 (6): 1448–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Scott and Neil Guppy. 1997. “Globalization and Educational Reforms in Anglo-American Democracies,” Comparative Education Review 41 (4): 435–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Scott and Floyd Hammack. (forthcoming). “The Channelling of Student Competition in Higher Education: Comparing Canada and the United States.” Journal of Higher Education.

  • Eichler, Margrit. 2001. “Women Pioneers in Canadian Sociology: The Effects of a Politics of Gender and a Politics of Knowledge,” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 26 (3): 375–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. “Feminism and Canadian Sociology,” The American Sociologist 33 (1): 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, Marcel. 2001. “Quebec Sociology and Quebec Society: The Construction of a Collective Identity,” Canadian Journal of Sociology, 26 (3): 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. “Quebec Sociology: A Discipline of its Object,” The American Sociologist, 33 (1): 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve. 2000. “A Very Qualified Success, Indeed: The Case of Anthony Giddens and British Sociology,” The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 25 (4): 507–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliher, John F. and James M. Galliher. 1995. Marginality and Dissent in Twentieth-Century American Sociology: The Case of Elizabeth Briant Lee and Alfred McClung Lee. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, Thomas F. and Richard F. Hirsh. 1983. “Marginality and Innovation in Science.” Social Studies of Science 13: 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1979. The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabb, Edward and James Curtis. 1988. “English Canadian-American Differences in Orientation Toward Social Control and Individual Rights”, Sociological Focus 21 (2): 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guppy, Neil and Bruce Arai. 1994. “Teaching Sociology: Comparing Undergraduate Curricula in the United States and in English Canada.” Teaching-Sociology 22 (3): 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, Terence C. 1992. “Introduction: Sociology's Fragile Professionalism,” in Halliday, Terence C. and Morris Janowitz. (eds.). Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Richard and Lowell Hargens. 1993. “The Politics of the Professors: Self-Identifications, 1969-1984.” Social Forces 71 (3): 603–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmes-Hayes, Rick. 2002. “John Porter: Canada's Most Famous Sociologist,” The American Sociologis 33(1): 79–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller Harry. 1979. “The Canadian Sociology Movement: Analysis and Assessment,” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 4 (2): 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1981. “Nationality, Relevance, and Ethnocentrism: An Essay in the Sociology of Canadian Book Publishing,” Social Forces 59 (4): 1297–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1982. Society and Change: S.D. Clark and the Development of Canadian Sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. “Legacy for a New Millennium: Canadian Sociology in the Twentieth Century as Seen Through its Publications, “ The Canadian Journal of Sociology 26 (3): 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, Harry and Simon Langlois. 2001. “The Most Important Books/Articles in Canadian Sociology in the Twentieth Century: A Report,” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 26 (3): 513–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Irving L. 1993. The Decomposition of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Joan. 2001. “Institutional Perspectives on Sociology,” Cole, Stephen (editor). 2001. What's Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 293–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi, Niilo. 1996. French Intellectual Nobility: Institutional and Symbolic Transformations in the Post-Sartrian Era. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, Raymond. 1981. A History of British Empirical Sociology. Aldershot UK: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Kristan. 1990. “Sociology and the Englishness of English Social Theory,” Sociological Theory 19 (1): 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, Charles. 1995. Sociology After the Crisis. New York: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroux, Robert. 2001. “La Nation and the Quebec Sociological Tradition (1890–1980),” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 26 (3): 349–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Donald. 1995. Visions of the Sociological Tradition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1982. “The Academic Mind at the Top: The Political Behavior of Faculty Elites,” Public Opinion Quarterly 46: 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. “The State of American Sociology,” Cole, Stephen (editor). 2001. What's Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 247–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, Neil. 1998. “How to Become a Forgotten Intellectual: Intellectual Movements and the Rise and Fall of Erich Fromm.” Sociological Forum 13: 215–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. “Origin Myths in the Social Sciences: Fromm, the Frankfurt School, and the Emergence of Critical Theory”. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 24 (1): 109–139, http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/cjscopy/ articles/mclaughlin.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001a. “Optimal Marginality: Innovation and Orthodoxy in Fromm's Revision of Psychoanalysis.” The Sociological Quarterly 42 (2): 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001b. “Critical Theory Meets America: Riesman, Fromm and The Lonely Crowd,” The American Sociologist, 2(1): 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, Harvey. 2001. “Going Out,” Cole, Stephen (editor). What's Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakhaie, Reza M. and Robert J. Brym. 1999. “The Political Attitudes of Canadian Professors.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 24 (3): 329–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nock, David A. 1993. Star Wars in Canadian Sociology: Exploring the Social Construction of Knowledge. Halifax: Fernwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2001. “Careers in Print: Canadian Sociological Books and Their Wider Impact, 1975–1992.” The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 26 (3): 469–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. “Prophetic versus Priestly Sociology: The Salient Case Study of Arthur K. Davis.” The American Sociologist, 33 (1): 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogmundson, Richard. 1994. “Beyond Lipset and His Critics,” The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 31 (2): 196–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. “The Canadian Case: Cornucopia of Neglected Research Opportunities,” The American Sociologist, 33 (1): 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Malley Pat and Alan Hunt. 2003. “Does Sociology Need to be Disciplined? A Response to Curtis and Weir,” Society/Société, March.

  • Polster, Claire. 2001. “A Break from the Past: Impacts and Implications of the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the Canada Research Chairs Initiatives.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 39 (3): 275–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard. 2001. Public Intellectuals. Cambridge University, Harvard University Press.

  • Royce, Edward. 1996.“The Public Intellectual Reconsidered,” Humanity and Society 20 (1): 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, Steven. 1994. Contested Knowledge: Social Theory in the Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Sheila and Larry Leslie. 1999. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy 1963. Power and the Front Line: Social Controls in a State Mental Hospital. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael R. 2002. “Labour Markets in Canada,” The American Sociologist, 33 (1): 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, Robert A. 2001. “The Aid to Scholarly Publications Programme: Contributions to Canadian Sociology,” The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 26 (3): 453–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, Arthur. 2001. “ Disintegrated Disciplines and the Future of Sociology,” Cole, Stephen (ed). What's Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 85–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1961. Democracy in America. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Stephen Park and Jonathan H. Turner. 1990. The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Jerry G. 1994. Heroism and The Black Intellectual: Ralph Ellison, Politics and Afro-American Intellectual Life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Alan. 1991. “Books versus Articles: Two Ways of Publishing Sociology.” Sociology Forum 5 (3): 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1998. Marginalized in the Middle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario

    Neil McLaughlin (associate professor)

Authors
  1. Neil McLaughlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

His research interests are in sociological theory, the sociology of culture, and the study of intellectuals from the perspective of the sociology of organisations and professions. He is studying Edward Said as a “global public intellectual” as part of a Canadian government-funded interdisciplinary grant on “Globalization and Autonomy” at McMaster University. He is also working “Canadian professors as public intellectuals,” a project also funded by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLaughlin, N. A Canadian rejoinder: Sociology north and south of the border. Am Soc 35, 80–101 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-004-1004-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-004-1004-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation