Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mutant Allele Tumor Heterogeneity (MATH) and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Proceedings of the North American Society of Head and Neck Pathology Companion Meeting, March 22, 2015, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Published:
Head and Neck Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intra-tumor heterogeneity, variation between individual tumor cells within a patient’s tumor, is increasingly seen as a critical mechanism underlying treatment resistance and therapeutic failure. Despite this growing awareness, few methods to assess intra-tumor heterogeneity exist outside the research laboratory, especially in the absence of a known marker. Mutant allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH) is a novel, non-biased, quantitative method to assess genetic heterogeneity based on tumor next generation exome sequencing. The quantitative aspect of MATH has allowed it to be verified as an actionable biomarker in a retrospective HNSCC data set with available exome sequencing and clinical data. In addition, it was also capable of stratifying patient outcome after controlling for other high-risk features such as p53 mutation, HPV status, and advanced tumor stage. Future work will explore the predictive power of MATH in larger data sets such as The Cancer Genome Atlas and examine the underlying cellular mechanisms responsible for intra-tumor heterogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burrell RA, Swanton C. Tumour heterogeneity and the evolution of polyclonal drug resistance. Mol Oncol. 2014;8(6):1095–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bedard PL, et al. Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic. Nature. 2013;501(7467):355–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Navin N, et al. Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing. Nature. 2011;472(7341):90–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Park SY, et al. Cellular and genetic diversity in the progression of in situ human breast carcinomas to an invasive phenotype. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(2):636–44.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Russnes HG, et al. Insight into the heterogeneity of breast cancer through next-generation sequencing. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(10):3810–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolff AC, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: american Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(2):241–56.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allison KH, Dintzis SM, Schmidt RA. Frequency of HER2 heterogeneity by fluorescence in situ hybridization according to CAP expert panel recommendations: time for a new look at how to report heterogeneity. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136(6):864–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shah SP, et al. Mutational evolution in a lobular breast tumour profiled at single nucleotide resolution. Nature. 2009;461(7265):809–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shah SP, et al. The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers. Nature. 2012;486(7403):395–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu X, et al. Single-cell exome sequencing reveals single-nucleotide mutation characteristics of a kidney tumor. Cell. 2012;148(5):886–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Crockford A, et al. Implications of intratumour heterogeneity for treatment stratification. J Pathol. 2014;232(2):264–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim JS, Lee SC. Understanding intra-tumour heterogeneity—the next holy grail of cancer therapeutics? Ann Acad Med Singap. 2014;43(2):72–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stransky N, et al. The mutational landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Science. 2011;333(6046):1157–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mroz EA, Rocco JW. MATH, a novel measure of intratumor genetic heterogeneity, is high in poor-outcome classes of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(3):211–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mroz EA, et al. High intratumor genetic heterogeneity is related to worse outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2013;119(16):3034–42.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonilla-Velez J, et al. Impact of human papillomavirus on oropharyngeal cancer biology and response to therapy: implications for treatment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013;46(4):521–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Renovanz M, Kim EL. Intratumoral heterogeneity, its contribution to therapy resistance and methodological caveats to assessment. Front Oncol. 2014;4:142.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shackleton M, et al. Heterogeneity in cancer: cancer stem cells versus clonal evolution. Cell. 2009;138(5):822–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Polyak K. Tumor heterogeneity confounds and illuminates: a case for Darwinian tumor evolution. Nat Med. 2014;20(4):344–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Andre N, Carre M, Pasquier E. Metronomics: towards personalized chemotherapy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11(7):413–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gatenby RA, et al. Adaptive therapy. Cancer Res. 2009;69(11):4894–903.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gerlinger M, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(10):883–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marabelle A, et al. Intratumoral immunization: a new paradigm for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(7):1747–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Lazikani B, Banerji U, Workman P. Combinatorial drug therapy for cancer in the post-genomic era. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(7):679–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Dr. Ed Mroz for helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier draft of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James W. Rocco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rocco, J.W. Mutant Allele Tumor Heterogeneity (MATH) and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Head and Neck Pathol 9, 1–5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-015-0617-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-015-0617-1

Keywords

Navigation