Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Implementation and Process Evaluation of the Louisiana 22nd Judicial District’s Behavioral Health Court

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The national offender reentry movement, Second Chance Act, and the widespread transfer of offender programming to community corrections have coalesced to substantially increase treatment for mental health and substance disorders within the criminal justice system. Intervention commonly entails program evaluation for accountability and empirical evidence by which to specify what works. Though mixed methods evaluation is preferable to a singular qualitative or quantitative approach, process steps are commonly overlooked. This paper relates an implementation and process design and evaluation midpoint findings for the Louisiana 22nd Judicial District’s Behavioral Health Court program, a post-conviction treatment initiative for mental health offenders. Interview guides and a fidelity instrument facilitated site visit data collection. Findings inform program implementation intensity, performance, improvement opportunities, and related fidelity research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blakely, C. H., Mayer, J. P., Gottschalk, R. G., Schmitt, N., Davidson, W. S., Roitman, D. B., et al. (1987). The fidelity-adaptation debate: Implications for the implementation of public sector social programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(3), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copes, H., & Miller, J. M. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Criminology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emshoff, J. G., Blakely, C., Gottschalk, R., Mayer, J., Davidson, W. S., & Erickson, S. (1987). Innovation in education and criminal justice: Measuring fidelity of implementation and program effectiveness. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(4), 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esbensen, F. A., Matsuda, K. N., Taylor, T. J., & Peterson, D. (2011). Multimethod strategy for assessing program fidelity: The national evaluation of the revised GREAT program. Evaluation Review, 35(1), 14–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, J. I. D., Mann, R. E., Rotgers, F., & Weekes, J. R. (2002). Using motivational interviewing with criminal justice populations. In W. R. Miller & S. Rollnick (Eds.), Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (pp. 333–346). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P.A., Steadman, H.J., & Petrila, J. (2014). The use of criminal charges and sanctions in mental health courts. Psychiatric Services.

  • Grote, N. K., Swartz, H. A., & Zuckoff, A. (2008). Enhancing interpersonal psychotherapy for mothers and expectant mothers on low incomes: Adaptations and additions. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 38(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K. (2012). Mental health court. Best Practices in Mental Health, 8(2), 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, A. S. (2006). Making the case for selective and directed cultural adaptations of evidence-based treatments: Examples from parent training. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13(4), 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter: The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(3), 575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurigio, A. J., Rollins, A., & Fallon, J. (2004). Effects of serious mental illness on offender reentry. The Federal Probation, 68, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. L., & Hickman, L. J. (2006). What works in corrections. Reducing the Criminal Activities of Offenders and Delinquents. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martino, S., & Moyers, T. B. (2008). Motivational interviewing with dually diagnosed patients. In H. Arkowitz, H. A. Westra, W. R. Miller, & S. Rollnick (Eds.), Motivational interviewing in the treatment of psychological problems (pp. 277–303). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, S. G., & Corrigan, P. W. (2008). Motivational Interviewing for medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia. In H. Arkowitz, H. A. Westra, W. R. Miller, & S. Rollnick (Eds.), Motivational interviewing in the treatment of psychological problems (pp. 277–303). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2007). Effectiveness of a mental health court in reducing criminal recidivism and violence. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(9), 1395–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.M. (2014). Identifying Collateral Effects of Offender Reentry Programming Through Evaluative Fieldwork. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1).

  • Miller, J. M., Koons-Witt, B. A., & Ventura, H. E. (2004). Barriers to evaluating the effectiveness of drug treatment behind bars. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(1), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. V., & Miller, J. M. (2010). Community in-reach through jail reentry: Findings from a quasi-experimental design. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 893–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. M., & Miller, H. V. (2011). Considering the effectiveness of drug treatment behind bars: Findings from a South Carolina RSAT evaluation. Justice Quarterly, 28(1), 70–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. M., & Miller, H. V. (2015). Rethinking program fidelity for criminal justice. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.M., & Miller, H.V. (2016). Validating program fidelity: Lessons from the Delaware County Second Chance Initiatives. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40.

  • Miller, H. V., Tillyer, R., & Miller, J. M. (2012). Recognizing the need for prisoner input in correctional research observations from an in-prison driving while intoxicated reduction program evaluation. The Prison Journal, 92(2), 274–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, J.P. (2013). Forensic Assertive Community Treatment: Updating the evidence. URL: http://gainscenter.samhsa.gov/cms-assets/documents/141801-618932.fact-fact-sheet---joe-morrissey.pdf. SAMHSA GAINS Center.

  • Mueser, K. T., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Resnick, S. G. (1998). Models of community care for severe mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24(1), 37–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueser, K.T., Corrigan, P.W., Hilton, D.W., Tanzman, B., Schaub, A., Gingerich, S., … & Herz, M.I. (2002). Illness management and recovery: a review of the research. Psychiatric Services, 53(10), 1272–1284.

  • Munetz, M. R., & Griffin, P. A. (2006). Use of the sequential intercept model as an approach to decriminalization of people with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 57(4), 544–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osher, F. C. (2006). Integrating mental health and substance abuse services for justice-involved persons with co-occuring disorders. Baltimore, MD: National GAINS Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osher, F.C. (2007). Short-term strategies to improve jail reentry of jail populations: Expanding and implementing the APIC model. American Jails. URL: https://www.bja.gov/Publications/APIC_Model.pdf. Last accessed: April 16, 2012.

  • Osher, F., & Steadman, H. (2007). Adapting evidence-based practices for persons with mental illness involved with the criminal justice system. Psychiatric Services, 58(11), 1472–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, F., & Lipton, D. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatments for drug abuse. The Prison Journal, 79(4), 384–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2004). What works in prisoner reentry-reviewing and questioning the evidence. The Federal Probation, 68, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMHSA (2010). Illness Management and Recovery Evidence-Based Practices (EBP) KIT.

  • Travis, J. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. The Urban Institute.

  • Watson, A., Hanrahan, P., Luchins, D., & Lurigio, A. (2014). Mental health courts and the complex issue of mentally ill offenders. Psychiatric Services.

  • Westra, H. A., & Dozois, D. J. A. (2008). Integrating motivational interviewing into the treatment of anxiety. In H. Arkowits, H. A. Westra, W. R. Miller, & S. Rollnick (Eds.), Motivational interviewing in the treatment of psychological problems (pp. 26–56). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckoff, A., Swartz, H. A., & Grote, N. K. (2008). Motivational interviewing as a prelude to psychotherapy of depression. Motivational Interviewing in the Treatment of Psychological Problems, 109, 14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this article was supported by the Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration and the United States Bureau of Justice Assistance, award # TI025928. Opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies. Special thanks to former Court Administrator Adrienne Stroble for assistance with description of the study Parishes and the Behavioral Health Court’s history and logisitics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Mitchell Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, J.M., Khey, D.N. An Implementation and Process Evaluation of the Louisiana 22nd Judicial District’s Behavioral Health Court. Am J Crim Just 41, 124–135 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-015-9326-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-015-9326-2

Keywords

Navigation