Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of Efficiency in Crime Control and Crime Prevention Programs

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to evaluate and compare the efficiency of crime control and crime prevention programs. The focus on efficiency adds knowledge about quality of performance in criminal justice programs. The case study covers twelve-year implementation process of two juvenile justice programs in a local law enforcement agency. A Truancy Reduction Program (TRP) represents the crime control approach. A School Resource Officer Program (SROP) represents the crime prevention approach. The evaluation shows that the SROP produced far more efficient results than the TRP. The SROP demonstrates gradual improvement and efficient implementation. The TRP appears inefficient and, therefore, should have been revised in the midst of the implementation period. The study draws policy implications for designing more efficient crime control and crime prevention programs. The implications can be useful for law enforcement agencies that contemplate or implement such programs

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpert, G. P., & Dunham, R. C. (1986). Community policing. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing (pp. 432–450). Prospect Hills: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A. (2001). An introduction to the policy process. Armonk: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boba, R., & Crank, J. P. (2008). Institutionalizing problem-oriented policing: rethinking problem solving, analysis, and accountability. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 9(5), 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broward Sheriff’s Office (2000) Truancy unit coordination standard operating procedures. Fort Lauderdale, Florida

  • Broward Sheriff’s Office (2007a) Adopted budget; fiscal year 2006/2007. Fort Lauderdale, Florida

  • Broward Sheriff’s Office (2007b) BSO in-house monthly report of Uniform Crime Report based statistics. Fort Lauderdale, Florida

  • Calhoun, J. A., & O’Neil, J. F. (2003). Preventing crime, reducing fear, and building community. In W. Geller & D. Stephens (Eds.), Local government police management (pp. 135–168). Washington: International City/County Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, M. (1980). Rational techniques in policy analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MA (2000) Measuring the costs and benefits of crime and justice. In: Duffee D (ed) Measurement and analysis of crime and justice: criminal justice 2000. NCJ 182411. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs

  • Delaney J, Shorstein H, Glover N (2001) Juvenile justice comprehensive strategy: City of Jacksonville 2000 annual report. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice

  • deLeon, P. (1999). The missing link revisited: contemporary implementation research. Policy studies review, 16(3/4), 311–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E., & Spelman, W. (1987). Problem-solving: problem oriented policing in newport news. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing (pp. 451–465). Prospect Hills: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1986). Mixed scanning revisited. Public Administration Review, 46(1), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2008). Crime in the United States. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor D, Ormond R (2000) Juvenile victims of property crimes. NCJ 184740. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Programs. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice

  • Finn P, McDevitt J (2005) National assessment of school resource officer programs final project report. NCJ 209273. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice

  • Gaffigan SJ (1994) Understanding community policing: a framework for action. NCJ 148457. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justice

  • Garry EM (1996) Truancy: first step to a lifetime of problems. NCJ 161958. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice

  • Gifford LS, Lindgren SA (1999) Justice expenditure and employment in the United States, 1995. NCJ 178235. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs

  • Gist NE (1997) Crime prevention and community policing: A vital partnership. NCJ 166819. Rockville, MD: National Criminal Justice Referral Service

  • Goldstein, H. (1987). Toward community-oriented policing: potential, basic requirements, and threshold questions. Crime & Delinquency, 33, 6–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham M (1996) Searching for answers: criminal justice research, development, and evaluation. NCJ 162042. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice

  • Guyot, D., & Martensen, K. R. (1991). The governmental setting. In W. Geller (Ed.), Local government police management (pp. 431–462). Washington: International City/County Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatry, H. P. (1972). Issues in productivity measurement for local governments. Public administration review, 32, 776–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman MJ, Reaves BA (2006) Sheriff’s offices 2003. NCJ 211361. Washington, D.C.: U.S. DOJ

  • Hill, K. Q., & Plumlee, J. P. (1984). Policy arenas and budgetary politics. Western politics quarterly, 37(1), 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes KA (2006) Justice expenditure and employment in the United States, 2003. NCJ 212260. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs

  • Huizinga D, Loeber R, Thornberry TP, Cothern L (2000) Co-occurrence of delinquency and other problem behaviors. NCJ 182211. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice

  • Ingram, H. (1990). Implementation: a review and suggested framework. In N. B. Lynn & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Public administration: the state of the art (pp. 462–80). Chatham: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith H (1991) Alternative theories of the policy process: Reflections on research strategy for the study of nuclear waste policy. PS: Political science and politics 24 (June). 157–166

  • Karchmer, C. L. (2003). Local drug control. In W. Geller & D. Stephens (Eds.), Local government police management (pp. 241–266). Washington: International City/County Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, G. L. (2003). The evolution of contemporary policing. In W. Geller & D. Stephens (Eds.), Local government police management (pp. 3–26). Washington: International City/County Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, G. L., & Coles, C. M. (1996). Fixing broken windows. NY: Martin Kessler Books, The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, J. E. (1994). Benefit-cost analysis in program evaluation. In J. Wholey, H. Hatry, & K. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 456–489). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren SA (1997) Justice expenditures and employment extracts, 1992: Data from the annual general finance and employment surveys. NCJ-148821. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs

  • Maguire K, Pastore AL (1998) Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1997. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Document. NCJ 171146. Albany, NY: University of Albany

  • Mastrofski, S. D. (2003). Personnel and agency performance measurement. In W. Geller & D. Stephens (Eds.), Local government police management (pp. 447–486). Washington: International City/County Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt J, Panniello J (2005) National assessment of school resource officer programs: survey of students in three new large SRO programs. NCJ 209270. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice

  • Miller TR, Cohen MA, Wiersama B (1996) Victim costs and consequences: A new look. NCJ 155282. National Institute of Justice. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office

  • Nagel, S. S. (1986). Efficiency, effectiveness, and equity in public policy evaluation. Policy studies review, 6, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, R. T., & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation. NY: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Justice (1999) A national assessment of the school resource officer program (grant solicitation). Title I of U.S. Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended in 1998, part Q, section 1709, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice

  • Nowicki, D. E. (2003). Human resource management and development. In W. Geller & D. Stephens (Eds.), Local government police management (pp. 353–390). Washington: International City/County Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, J., Perkins, M., & Zepp, J. (2006). Weed and seed performance measures: analyzing and improving data resources final report. Washington: Justice Research and Statistics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, H. L. (1996). Two models of the criminal justice process. In B. Hancock & P. Sharp (Eds.), Criminal justice in America: theory, practice, and policy (pp. 155–165). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., Doughtie, J. C., & McCulloch, M. K. (1977). Types of democratic systems and types of public policy: an empirical examination. Comparative Politics, 9, 327–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poister, T. H. (1978). Public program analysis. Baltimore: University Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puzzanchera C, Stahl AL, Finnegan TA, Snyder HN, Poole RS, Tierney N (2000) Juvenile court statistics 1997. National Center for Juvenile Justice. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office

  • Roman CG, Jenkins S, Wolff A (2006) Understanding community justice partnerships: testing a conceptual framework and foundations for measurement. NCJ 215345. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice

  • Roy-Stevens C (1997) Truancy reduction demonstration program. (Grant solicitation). Rockville, MD: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

  • Russell, G. D. (1997). The political ecology of police reform. Policing: An international journal of police strategies and management, 20, 567–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1999). The need for better theories. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 3–17). Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadd, S., & Grinc, R. M. (1996). Implementation challenges in community policing. Rockville: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, H. L. (2007). Does Frederick Taylor’s ghost still haunt the halls of government? A look at the concept of governmental efficiency in our time. Public administration review, 67(5), 800–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman LW, Gottfredson DC, MacKenzie DL, Eck J, Reuter P, Bushway SD (1998) Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. NCJ 171676. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice

  • Skogan, W. G. (1976). Efficiency and effectiveness in big city police departments. Public administration review, 36, 278–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K., & Collins, C. B. (2006). Florida statistical abstract 2006. Gainesville: University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder HN (2001) Law enforcement and juvenile crime. NCJ 191031. Washington, D.C.: U.S. DOJ

  • Snyder, H. N., Sickmund, M., & National Center for Juvenile Justice. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow MK (1988) Implementing community policing. Perspectives on policing. National Institute of Justice. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice

  • Stephens, D. W. (2003). Organization and management. In W. Geller & D. Stephens (Eds.), Local government police management (pp. 27–66). Washington: International City/County Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, T. D. (2005). Local politics and police strength. Justice quarterly, 22(2), 139–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, E. A., Lynch, L. M., & McBride, R. B. (1990). Proactive police management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis LF, Coon JK (2005) The role of law enforcement in public school safety: a national survey. NCJ 211676. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice

  • Trojanowicz, R., & Bucqueroux, B. (1990). Community policing: a contemporary perspective. Cincinnati: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trojanowicz, R., Kappeler, V. E., Gaines, L. K., Bucqueroux, B., & Sluder, R. (1998). Community policing: a contemporary perspective. Cincinnati: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, C. D. (1993). The development of the American police: an historical overview. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing (pp. 16–32). Prospect Hills: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (1998). Popular justice: a history of American criminal justice. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, V. J., & Katz, C. M. (1997). Citizen ratings of the importance of community policing activities. Policing: An international journal of police strategies & management, 20, 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westin SS (1998) Performance measurement and evaluation: definitions and relationships. GAO/GGD-98-26. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office

  • Wildavsky, A. (1992). The new politics of the budgetary process. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing (pp. 395–407). Prospect Hills: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, O. W., & McLaren, R. C. (1972). Police administration (3rd ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, G. T. (1972). Improving management effectiveness in the federal government. Public administration review, 32, 764–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Broward County Sheriff’s Department, Broward, FL, USA

    John Carroll

  2. Florida Atlantic University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA

    Efraim Ben-Zadok & Clifford McCue

Authors
  1. John Carroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Efraim Ben-Zadok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Clifford McCue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clifford McCue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carroll, J., Ben-Zadok, E. & McCue, C. Evaluation of Efficiency in Crime Control and Crime Prevention Programs. Am J Crim Just 35, 219–235 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-010-9080-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-010-9080-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation