Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current Concepts in Dystrophinopathies

  • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dystrophinopathies comprise a group of hereditary muscle disorders characterized by progressive wasting and weakness of skeletal muscle, as a result of degeneration of muscle fibers, and can be distinguished by the mode of transmission, age at onset and pattern of muscle weakness. The range of phenotypes associated with the region Xp21 has been expanding since identification of the gene in 1987. The mild end of the spectrum includes the phenotype of the muscle cramps with myoglobinuria and isolated quadriceps myopathy, while at the severe end, there are progressive muscle diseases that are classified as Duchenne / Becker muscular dystrophy (DMD/BMD).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dubowitz V. Muscle disorders in childhood. 2nd ed. London: W.B.Saunders; 1995. p. 34–134.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Monaco AP, Nerve RL, Colletti-Feener C, Bertelson CJ, Kurnit DM, Kunkel LM. Isolation of candidate cDNA’s for portions of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene. Nature. 1986;323:646–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koenig M, Hoffman EP, Berteleson CJ, Monaco AP, Feener C, Kunkel LM. Complete cloning of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy cDNA and preliminary genomic organization of the DMD gene in normal and affected individuals. Cell. 1987;50:509–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koenig M, Monaco AP, Kunkel LM. The complete sequence of the dystrophin predicts a rod shaped cyto-skeleton protein. Cell. 1988;53:219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffman EP, Brown Jr RH, Kunkel LM. Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell. 1987;51:919–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Emery AE. Muscular dystrophy in to the new millennium. Neuromuscul Disord. 2002;12:343–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffman EP, Kunkel LM, Angelini C, Clarke A, Johnson M, Harris JB. Improved diagnosis of Becker muscular dystrophy by dystrophin testing. Neurology. 1989;39:1011–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Emery AE. Population frequencies of inherited neuromuscular diseases-a world survey. Neuromuscul Disord. 1991;1:19–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mittal A, Kumari D, Gupta M, Goyle S. Molecular characterization of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and phenotypic correlation. J Neurol Sci. 1998;157:179–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koenig M, Beggs AH, Moyer M, Scherpf S, Heindrich K, Bettecken T, et al. The molecular basis for Duchenne vs Becker muscular dystrophy: correlation of severity with type of deletion. Am J Hum Genet. 1989;45:498–506.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicholson LV, Johnson MA, Davies KE. Integrated dystrophin analysis using Immune-cytochemical, biochemical and genetic techniques. Basic Appl Histochem. 1990;34:169–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Danieli GA, Mioni F, Muller CR, Vitiello L, Mostacciuolo ML, Grimm T. Patterns of deletions of the dystrophin gene in diferrent European populations. Human Genet. 1993;91:342–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Love DR, Flint TJ, Gent SA, Middleton Price HR, Davies KE. Becker muscular dystrophy patient with a large intragenic dystrophin deletion, implications for functional mini-genes and gene therapy. J Med Genet. 1991;28:860–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. England SB, Nicholson LV, Johnson MA, Forrest SM, Love DR, Zubrzycka-Gaarn EE, et al. Very mild muscular dystrophy associated with the deletion of 46% of the dystrophin. Nature. 1990;343:180–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Love DR, Flint TJ, Marsden RF, Bloomfield JF, Daniels RJ, Forrest SM, et al. Characterisation of deletion in the dystrophin gene giving mild phenotypes. Am J Med Genet. 1990;37:136–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Melis MA, Cau M, Muntoni F, Mateddu A, Galanello R, Boccone L, et al. Elevation of serum creatine kinase as the only manifestation of an intragenic deletion of the dystrophin gene in three unrelated families. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 1998;2:255–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Monaco AP, Bertelson CJ, Liechti-Gallati S, Moser H, Kunkel LM. An explanation for the phenotypic differences between patients bearing partial deletion of the DMD locus. Genomics. 1988;2:90–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sinha S, Mishra S, Singh V, Mittal R, Mittal B. High frequency of new mutations in North Indian Duchenne / Becker muscular dystrophy patients. Clin Genet. 1996;50:327–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aartsma-Rus A, Van Deutekom JC, Fokkema IF, Van Ommen GJ, Den Dunnen JT. Entries in the Leiden Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutation database: an overview of the mutation types and paradoxical cases that confirm the reading frame rule. Muscle Nerve. 2006;34:135–44.

  20. Muntoni F, Torelli S, Ferlini A. Dystrophin and mutations: one gene, several proteins, multiple phenotypes. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:731–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pandey GS, Kesari A, Mukherjee M, Mittal R, Mittal B. Re-evaluation of reading frame-shift hypothesis in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy. Neurol India. 2003;51:367–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Den Dunnen JT, Grootscholten PM, Bakker E, Blonden LA, Ginjaar HB, Wapenaar MC, et al. Topography of the Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) gene. FIGE and cDNA analysis of 194 cases reveals 115 deletions and 13 duplications. Am J Hum Genet. 1989;45:835–47.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beggs AH, Koenig M, Boyce FM, Kunkel LM. Detection of 98% of the DMD/BMD gene deletions by polymerase chain reaction. Hum Genet. 1990;86:45–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roberts RG, Bobrow M, Bentley DR. Point mutations in the dystrophin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:2331–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwartz M, Duno M. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification is superior for detecting deletions/duplications in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin Genet. 2005;67:189–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Janssen B, Hartmann C, Scholz V, Jauch A, Zschocke J. MLPA analysis for the detection of deletions, duplications and complex rearrangements in the dystrophin gene: Potential and pitfalls. Neurogenetics. 2005;6:29–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dastur RS, Kachwala MY, Khadilkar SV, Hegde MR, Gaitonde PS. Identification of deletions and duplications in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene and female carrier status in western India using combined methods of multiplex polymerase chain reaction and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Neurol India. 2011;59:803–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Escolar DM, Hache LP, Clemens PR, Cnaan A, McDonald CM, Viswanathan V, et al. Randomized, blinded trial of weekend versus daily prednisone in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Neurology. 2011;77:444–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Korf BR, Darras BT, Urion DK. Dystrophinopathies. Updated 5th Sep 2000. Available at http://www.geneclinics.org.

  30. Nair DG, Mellion ML. Dystrophinopathies. Updated April 10th 2014. Available at http://www.emedicine.medscape.com.

  31. Standards of care for DMD in India. MDA India. Last updated Jan 2014. Available at http://www.mdindia.org.

  32. Bushby K, Finkel R, Birnkrant DJ, Case LE, Clemens PR, Cripe L, et al; DMD Care Considerations Working Group. The diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:77–93.

  33. Hollingworth KG, Garrood P, Eagle M, Bushby K, Straub V. Magnetic resonance imaging in Duchenne musscular dystrophy : longitudinal assessment of natural history over 18 mos. Muscle Nerve. 2013;48:586–8.

  34. Tanveer N, Sharma MC, Sarkar C, Gulati S, Kalra V, Singh S, et al. Diganostic utility of skin biopsy in dystrophinopathies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009;111:496–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Mr. Suresh, Dr. Chidambaranathan, Dr. Padma, Management of Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS Trust and Apollo Hospitals, Apollo Hospitals Education and Research Foundation and CHILDS Trust Medical Research Foundation, Chennai and all the parents who have so willingly contributed to Muscular Dystrophy Association India.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkataraman Viswanathan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viswanathan, V. Current Concepts in Dystrophinopathies. Indian J Pediatr 82, 172–178 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-014-1621-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-014-1621-2

Keywords

Navigation