Skip to main content
Log in

Social Impact of Dialysis on Children and Their Families

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 09 May 2014

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the social consequences of dialysis on children and their parents.

Methods

From January through June 2012 short structured interviews with parents or caregivers of children on peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD) who were followed up at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Faisal Specialty Hospital and Research Center, or the Kidney Center at King Fahad Hospital were conducted. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.

Results

Thirty six children (22 boys and 16 girls) and their families were included. The mean (SD) age of the children was 11.5 ± 6.87 y, and the mean (SD) duration of dialysis was 28 ± 11.32 mo. Only one third of the families had the opportunity to choose the modality of dialysis. Both modalities of dialysis had a negative effect on fathers’ jobs in over 50 % of the cases. Similarly, both modalities of treatment had a considerable impact on the quality of care provided by the mothers to other family members. There was no difference between the two modalities on the frequency of admissions.

Conclusions

Both PD and HD had a negative impact on fathers’ jobs and on the level of care provided by mothers to the rest of the family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McDonald SP, Craig JC; Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Nephrology Association. Long-term survival of children with end-stage renal disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2654–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Groothoff JW, Gruppen MP, Offringa M, Hutten J, Lilien MR, Van De Kar NJ, et al. Mortality and causes of death of end-stage renal disease in children: A Dutch cohort study. Kidney Int. 2002;61:621–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reiss J. Managing chronic diseases: Care of children with chronic illness teaches some lessons. BMJ. 2005;330:963–4. discussion 964–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerson AC, Furth SL, Neu AM, Fivush BA. Assessing associations between medication adherence and potentially modifiable psychosocial variables in pediatric kidney transplant recipients and their families. Pediatr Transplant. 2004;8:543–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Manificat S, Dazord A, Cochat P, Morin D, Plainguet F, Debray D. Quality of life of children and adolescents after kidney or liver transplantation: Child, parents and caregiver’s point of view. Pediatr Transplant. 2003;7:228–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eiser C. Psychological effects of chronic disease. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1990;31:85–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Varni JW, Limbers CA. The pediatric quality of life inventory: Measuring pediatric health-related quality of life from the perspective of children and their parents. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009;56:843–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein SL, Graham N, Warady BA, Seikaly M, McDonald R, Burwinkle TM, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in children with ESRD: Performance of the generic and ESRD-specific instrument of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51:285–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park KS, Cho MH, Ha IS, Kang HG, Cheong HI, Park YS, et al. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the pediatric quality of life ESRD module. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cimete G. Stress factors and coping strategies of parents with children treated by hemodialysis: A qualitative study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2002;17:297–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kärrfelt HM, Berg UB, Lindblad FI. Renal transplantation in children: Psychological and donation-related aspects from the parental perspective. Pediatr Transplant. 2000;4:305–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baines LS, Beattie TJ, Murphy AV, Jindal RM. Relationship between donors and pediatric recipients of kidney transplants: A psychosocial study. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:1897–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Korevaar JC, Feith GW, Dekker FW, van Manen JG, Boeschoten EW, Bossuyt PM, et al. Effect of starting with hemodialysis compared with peritoneal dialysis in patients new on dialysis treatment: A randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int. 2003;64:2222–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of stage 5 chronic kidney disease. National Institute for Healthy and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG125. Accessed December 11, 2012.

  15. Mason J, Khunti K, Stone M, Farooqi A, Carr S. Educational interventions in kidney disease care: A systematic review of randomized trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51:933–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Friedman AL. The broader burden of end-stage renal disease on children and their families. Kidney Int. 2006;70:1893–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tong A, Lowe A, Sainsbury P, Craig JC. Experiences of parents who have children with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Pediatrics. 2008;121:349–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Paula ES, Nascimento LC, Rocha SM. The influence of social support on strengthening families of children with chronic renal failure. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2008;16:692–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. SCOT Data (Saudi Center of Organ Transplantation). Organ transplantation in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010;21:1179–87.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Albar M. Organ transplantation: A Sunni Islamic perspective. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2012;23:817–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge with thanks Deanship of Scientific Research for their technical and financial support. The authors also thank the Clinical Research Unit at King Abdulaziz University Hospital for their assistance with the statistics and writing up of this paper.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Role of Funding Source

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah under the grand number (432/003/d) for pediatric nephrology research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jameela Abdulaziz Kari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kari, J.A., Alzahrany, M., El-Deek, B. et al. Social Impact of Dialysis on Children and Their Families. Indian J Pediatr 81, 1020–1026 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-013-1236-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-013-1236-z

Keywords

Navigation