Skip to main content
Log in

A tool for rapid socioeconomic assessment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To validate a simple wealth index scale (WIS) based assessment of socioeconomic status and compare it with existing kuppuswamy(KUP) scale.

Methods

Families of 300 children aged 6 to 59 months of acute diarrhoea enrolled in a cross-sectional study were interviewed for socio economic status using both 8 item ownership scale (WIS) and Kuppuswamy (KUP) scale, validated against a reference standard Income Scale (IS).

Results

Out of 111 people classified as low based on Income scale (IS), 17% were identified by WIS, and 21% by KUP. In the upper low, 69.4% were identified by WIS and 84.3% by KUP. Amongst the low middle group the WIS identified 27.6% while KUP identified 10.6% and amongst upper middle patients 30% were identified by WIS and 15% by KUP. There were none in the upper income of WIS or KUP category. The WIS performed well in all income categories whereas the KUP was better for upper low and low income categories. The agreement between WI and KUP was 55.56%.

Conclusion

KUP scale is lengthy and difficult to administer by pediatric students and biased towards professional qualifications and education, rather than actual standard of living. It can be replaced by a simple 8 item ownership scale (WI) which is robust for all income groups and also shows good agreement with KUP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuppuswami B. Manual of Socioeconomic scale (Urban), New Delhi, Manasayan, 32, Netaji Subhash Marg, 1981.

  2. Mahajan BK, Gupta MC, Textbook of preventive and social medicine. Delhi 2nd edn. Jaypee Brothers, 1995; 134–135.

  3. Mishra D, Singh H. Kuppuswamy socioeconomic status scale — a Revision. Indian J Pediatr 2003; 70: 273–274.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. National Family Health Survey-2, 1998–1999. International Institute of Population Sciences, Mumbai

  5. The World Bank Participation Sourcebook, Appendix I, Methods and Tools, Available from URL: http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/sourcebook/sbhome.htm

  6. Social Impact Assessment Tools and Methods available from URL: http://www.unep.ch/etu/publications/EIA-2ed/EIA_E_top13_hd.pdf

  7. Mack J, Lansley, S. Poor Britain. London, George Allen and Unwin Ltd. available from URL: http://www.mande.co.uk/docs/democrat.htm

  8. Understanding Poverty, Overview. Available from URL. http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/health/wbect/health_eg_tno4,pdf.

  9. Background Document, unedited draft, 23-01-05 Unedited Working Paper, 14-07-2005 Global health promotion scaling up for 2015 — A brief review of major impacts and developments over the past 20 years and challenges for 2015. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/entity/healthpromotion/conferences/6gchp/hpr_conference_background.pdf

  10. Aggarwal OP, Bhasin SK, Sharma AK, Chhabra P, Aggarwal K, Rajoura OP. A new instrument (Scale) for measuring the socio economic status of a family: Preliminary Study. Indian J Commun Medicine 30(4): 10–12.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Archana B. Patel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, A.B., Prabhu, A.S., Dibley, M.J. et al. A tool for rapid socioeconomic assessment. Indian J Pediatr 74, 349–352 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-007-0058-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-007-0058-2

Key words

Navigation