Abstract
Purpose
To analyze the clinicopathological features, prognostic factors, treatment efficacy and safety among elderly patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.
Methods
Three hundred and nineteen patients aged 65 years and older, diagnosed with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, were followed and data were retrospectively collected, reviewed and analyzed.
Results
The elderly patients carried specific clinicopathological characteristics. Body mass index (BMI), number of metastatic lesions, ascites, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), tumor differentiation grade, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, local treatment, and chemotherapy were the independent prognostic factors. Serum LDH level was superior to the serum CEA level in the prognosis of advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in older patients. Cisplatin-based regimen, chemotherapy cycles, metastatic lesions, LDH level, and supraclavicular lymph node metastasis were the independent prognostic factors in 220 patients receiving chemotherapy. The toxicity was mild and tolerable.
Conclusion
KPS, BMI and a well-differentiated histopathology were factors favoring longer survival, whereas elevated serum LDH and a greater number of metastatic lesions were associated with poor prognosis among those elderly patients. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy provided survival benefits and mild toxicity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- CEA:
-
Carcinoembryonic antigen
- CR:
-
Complete response
- 5-FU:
-
5-Fluorouracil
- HR:
-
Hazards ratio
- KPS:
-
Karnofsky performance score
- LDH:
-
Lactate dehydrogenase
- PR:
-
Partial response
- SD:
-
Stable disease
- TTP:
-
Time to progression
References
Munoz N, Franceschi S (1997) Epidemiology of gastric cancer and perspectives for prevention. Salud Publica Mex 39:318–330
Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24:2137–2150
Bruckner HW, Morris JC, Mansfield P (2000) Neoplasms of the stomach. In: Cancer medicine, 5th edn. BC Decker, Hamilton, pp 1355–1390
Wu CX, Zheng Y, Bao PP et al (2008) Pattern of changing incidence of gastric cancer and its time trend in Shanghai. J Surg Concerpts Pract 13:24–29
Arai T, Takubo K (2007) Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of gastric and colorectal carcinomas in the elderly. Pathol Int 57:303–314
Cascinu S, Labianca R, Alessandroni P et al (1997) Intensive weekly chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer using fluorouracil, cisplatin, epi-doxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione, and filgrastim: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:3313–3319
Cascinu S, Scartozzi M, Labianca R et al (2004) High curative resection rate with weekly cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione, and filgastrim in patients with locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer [GISCAD]. Br J Cancer 8:1521–1525
Habu H, Endo M (1989) Gastric cancer in elderly patients: results of surgical treatment. Hepatogastroenterology 36:71–74
Fujimoto S, Takahashi M, Ohkubo H et al (1994) Comparative clinicopathologic features of early gastric cancer in young and older patients. Surgery 115:516–520
Wang JY, Hsieh JS, Huang CJ et al (1996) Clinicopathologic study of advanced gastric cancer without serosal invasion in young and old patients. J Surg Oncol 63:36–40
Saif MW, Makrilia N, Zalonis A et al (2010) Gastric cancer in the elderly: an overview. Eur J Surg Oncol 36:709–717
Arai T, Esaki Y, Inoshita N et al (2004) Pathologic characteristics of gastric cancer in the elderly: a retrospective study of 994 surgical patients. Gastric Cancer 7:154–159
Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Saihara T et al (1997) Clinical and pathologic features of early gastric cancer in elderly patients. Hepatogastroenterology 44:1164–1168
Inoshita N, Yanagisawa A, Arai T et al (1998) Pathological characteristics of gastric carcinomas in the very old. Jpn J Cancer Res 89:1087–1092
Wu CW, Lo SS, Shen KH et al (2000) Surgical mortality, survival and quality of life after resection for gastric cancer in the elderly. World J Surg 24:465–472
Maehara Y, Emi Y, Tomisaki S et al (1996) Age-related characteristics of gastric carcinoma in young and elderly patients. Cancer 77:1774–1780
Nielsen J, Aagaard J, Toftgaard C (1985) Gastric cancer with special reference to prognostic factors: a review of 779 cases. Acta Chir Scand 151:49–55
Chau I, Norman AR, Cunningham D et al (2004) Multivariate prognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esophago-gastric cancer-pooled analysis from three multicenter, randomised, controlled trials using individual patient data. J Clin Oncol 22:2395–2403
Sudo H, Takagi Y, Katayanagi S et al (2006) Bone metastasis of gastric cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 33:1058–1060
Glimelius B, Ekström K, Hoffman K et al (1997) Randomised comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 8:163–168
Pyrhönen S, Kuitunen T, Nyandoto P et al (1995) Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 71:587–591
Murad AM, Santiago FF, Petroianu A et al (1993) Modified therapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 72:37–41
Trumper M, Ross PJ, Cunningham D et al (2006) Efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer: a pooled analysis of three clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 42:827–834
Santini D, Graziano F, Catalano V et al (2006) Weekly oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (OXALF) as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: results of a phase II trial. BMC Cancer 6:125
Graziano F, Santini D, Testa E et al (2003) A phase II study of weekly cisplatin, 6S-stereoisomer leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 89:1428–1432
Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221
Seol YM, Song MK, Choi YJ et al (2009) Oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine or S-1) and cisplatin as first line treatment in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:43–48
Tsushima T, Hironaka S, Boku N et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 13:245–250
Lee JL, Kang YK, Kang HJ et al (2008) A randomised multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine vs S-1 as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent unresectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 99:584–590
Tsuji A, Shima Y, Morita S et al (2008) Combination chemotherapy of S-1 and low-dose twice-weekly cisplatin for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer in an outpatient setting: a retrospective study. Anticancer Res 28:1433–1438
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission Programs “Optimization of pharmacotherapy and individual selection in gastric cancer” (No. D101100050010023) and “Exploring the utilization of molecular markers in the individual treatment of gastric cancer based on the clinical research cohort”.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest relating to the publication of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, Z., Lu, M., Zhang, X. et al. Advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in elderly patients: clinicopathological, prognostic factors and treatments. Clin Transl Oncol 15, 376–383 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-012-0938-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-012-0938-4