Skip to main content
Log in

Cauliflower waste incorporation into cane molasses improves ethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae MTCC 178

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diluted cane molasses having total sugar and reducing sugar content of 9.60 and 3.80% (w/v) respectively was subjected to ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae MTCC 178. Incorporation of dried Cauliflower Waste (CW) in molasses at the level of 15 % increased ethanol production by nearly 36 % compared to molasses alone. Addition of 0.2 % yeast extract improved ethanol production by nearly 49 % as compared to molasses alone. When the medium containing diluted molasses and 0.2 % yeast extract was supplemented with 15 % CW, 29 % more ethanol was produced compared to molasses with 0.2 % yeast extract. Cell biomass, ethanol production, final ethanol concentration and fermentation efficiency of 2.65 mg mL−1, 41.2 gL−1, 0.358 gg−1 and 70.11 % respectively were found to be best at 15% CW supplementation level besides reduction in fermentation time but further increase in CW level resulted in decline on account of all the above parameters. This is probably the first report to our knowledge, in which CW was used in enhancing ethanol production significantly using a small quantity of yeast extract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FAO (2006) Statistical data for agricultural crops. www.fao.org

  2. Kulkarni M, Motey R & Lele SS (2001) Biotechnology in Agriculture, Industry and environment. Proc. of the International conference of SAARC countries organized by Microbiologists society at Karad, India pp. 24–31

  3. Oberoi HS, Kalra KL, Gupta AK & Uppal DS (2007) Effect of addition of cauliflower waste on glucoamylase production by Aspergillus niger NCIM 1054. J Fd Sci Technol 44:509–512

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin Y & Tanaka S (2006) Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: Current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotech 69:627–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kheshgi HS, Prince RC & Marland G (2000) The potential of biomass fuels in the context of global climate change; Focus on transportation of fuels. Ann Rev Energy Environ 5:199–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois M, Giles KA, Hamilton JK, Robert PA & Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 25:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller G (1959) Dinitro salicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Anal Chem 31:426–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Standing CN, Fredrickson AG & Tochina HN (1972) Batch and continuous culture for two substrate systems. Appl Microbiol 23:354–364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rao JS, Singhal, RS & Kulkarni PRJ (1998) Xylose syrup from cottonseed hulls: optimization of hydrolysis conditions and purification by ion exchange resins. J Sci Ind Res 57:196–200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Devi SP & Singh HD (1995) Bioconversion of water hyacinth hemicellulose and xylose rich sugar mixtures to ethanol by Neurospora crassa. Enz Microb Technol 8:149–152

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gil-Hwan An, Byung-Gui Jang & Myung-Haing Cho (2001) Cultivation of the carotenoid-hyperproducing mutant 2A2N of the red yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous (Phaffia rhodozyma) with molasses. J Biosci Bioengg 92:121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zanichelli D, Carloni F, Hasanaj E, Andrea ND, Filippini A & Setti C (2007) Production of ethanol by an integrated valorization of olive oil by products. The role of phenolics in inhibition. Env Sci Poll Res 14:5–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rozes, N, Arola, NL & Bordans A (2003) Effect of phenolic compounds on the co-metabolism of citric acid and sugars by Oenococcus oeni from wine. Lett Appl Microbiol. 36:337–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stehlik-Tomas V, Zetic VG, Stanzer D, Grba S & Vahcic N (2004) Copper and managnese enrichment in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Technol Biotechnol 42:115–120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grohmann K, Cameron RG & Buslig BS (1996) Fermentation of orange peel hydrolysates by ethanologenic Escherichia coli. Effects of nutritional supplements. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 57–58:383–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy LV & Reddy OVS (2006) Ethanol production from dried mango peel and effect of nutrient supplementation. Poster no. [P9.08]. Sustainability of the Agri Food Chain, The Hague, Netherlands, Nov 7–9

  17. Ensminger AH & Esminger MKJ (1986) Food for Health: A Nutrition Encyclopedia. Clovis, California: Pegus Press; PMID: 15210

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nancib A, Nancib N, Meziane-Cherif D, Boubendir A., Fick M & Boudran J (2005) Joint effect of nitrogen sources and B vitamin supplementation of date juice on lactic acid production by Lactobacillus casei subsp. rhamnosus. Bioresour Technol 96:63–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Patil SG & Patil BG (1989) Chitin supplement speeds up the ethanol production in cane molasses fermentation. Enz Microb Technol 11:1138–1143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harinder Singh Oberoi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhillon, G.S., Bansal, S. & Oberoi, H.S. Cauliflower waste incorporation into cane molasses improves ethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae MTCC 178. Indian J Microbiol 47, 353–357 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-007-0063-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-007-0063-1

Keywords

Navigation