Abstract
Although encounters between organisms are fundamental to many ecological processes, a general theory of encounters that accounts for random movements and probabilistic events has yet to be proposed. We present a framework for examining probabilistic encounters between arbitrarily moving searchers and immobile targets in continuous space and time. We define and contrast first encounter rates and mean encounter rates, which are generally not equal and depend on several properties of the process, including movement behaviors, the spatial scales of the encounter kernel, spatial distribution and birth–death dynamics of targets, and whether the encounters are destructive. Based on these considerations, we propose a taxonomy of encounter processes and discuss their functional relationships. Analytical approximations in several special cases are derived, leading to inference about general patterns. We identify, for example, cases (nondestructive, mean encounters) in which encounter rates are completely independent of movement velocity or tortuosity, and we quantify the dependence for cases (e.g., hard, first encounters and destructive encounters in a dynamic landscape) where there is a relationship. The analytical results lead to general qualitative conclusions, while the mathematical formalization and taxonomic organization provides a framework for studying and contrasting a broad range of encounter processes in ecology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson J (2010) Ratio-and predator-dependent functional forms for predators optimally foraging in patches. Am Nat 175:240–249
Anderson JJ, Gurarie E, Zabel RW (2005) Mean free-path length theory of predator–prey interactions: application to juvenile Salmon migration. Ecol Model 186:196–211
Avgar T, Kuefler D, Fryxell J (2011) Linking rates of diffusion and consumption in relation to resources. Am Nat 178:182–190
Bartumeus F, Da Luz MGE, Viswanathan GM, Catalan J (2005) Animal search strategies: a quantitative random-walk analysis. Ecology 86:3078–3087
Bartumeus F, Catalan J, Viswanathan G, Raposo E, da Luz M (2008) The influence of turning angles on the success of non-oriented animal searches. J Theor Biol 252:43–55
Berg HC (1983) Random walks in biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Block B, Jonsen I, Jorgensen S, Winship A, Shaffer S, Bograd S et al (2011) Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean. Nature 475:86–90
Borchers D, Efford M (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture–recapture studies. Biometrics 64:377–385
Boukal D, Berec L (2002) Single-species models of the Allee effect: extinction boundaries, sex ratios and mate encounters. J Theor Biol 218:375–394
Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2007) Advanced distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, London
Clausius R (1859) On the mean length of the paths described by the separate molecules of gaseous bodies on the occurrence of molecular motion: together with some other remarks on the mechanical theory of heat. Philos Mag 17:81–91
Codling EA, Plank MJ, Benhamou S (2008) Random walk models in biology (review). J Roy Soc Interface 5:813–834
Evans GT (1989) The encounter speed of moving predator and prey. J Plankton Res 11:415–417
Gerritsen J, Strickler J (1977) Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. J Fish Res Board Can 34:73–82
Gurarie E, Anderson JJ, Zabel RW (2009) Incorporating population heterogeneity into analysis of animal dispersal and movement. Ecology 90:2233–2242
Gurarie E, Ovaskainen O (2011) Characteristic spatial and temporal scales unify models of animal movement. Am Nat 178:113–123
Hapca S, Crawford J, Young I (2009) Anomalous diffusion of heterogeneous populations characterized by normal diffusion at the individual level. J Roy Soc Interface 6:111–122
Harrison P, Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2011) Bayesian state-space modeling of metapopulation dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Ecol Monogr 81:581–598
Heinz SK, Conradt L, Wissel C, Frank K (2005) Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: deriving a practical formula for patch accessibility. Landsc Ecol 20:83–99
Hutchinson J, Waser P (2007) Use, misuse and extensions of the “ideal gas” models of animal movement. Biol Rev 82:335–359
James A, Pitchford J, Plank M (2010) Efficient or inaccurate? Analytical and numerical modelling of random search strategies. Bull Math Biol 72:896–913
James A, Plank M, Brown R et al (2008) Optimizing the encounter rate in biological interactions: ballistic versus Lévy versus Brownian strategies. Phys Rev E 78:51128
Kareiva PM, Shigesada N (1983) Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 56:234–238
Maxwell J (1860) Illustrations of the dynamical theory of gases: part 1. On the motions and collisions of perfectly elastic spheres. Philos Mag 19:19–32
McKenzie H, Lewis M, Merrill E (2009) First passage time analysis of animal movement and insights into the functional response. Bull Math Biol 71:107–129
Molnár P, Derocher A, Lewis M, Taylor M (2008) Modelling the mating system of polar bears: a mechanistic approach to the Allee effect. Proc R Soc B 275:217–226
Morales JM, Haydon DT, Frair J, Holsinger KE, Fryxell JM (2004) Extracting more out of relocation data: building movement models as mixtures of random walks. Ecology 85(9):2436–2445
O’Brien J, Evans B, Browman H (1989) Flexible search tactics and efficient foraging in saltatory searching animals. Oecologia 80:100–110
Okubo A (1980) Diffusion and ecological problems: modern perspectives. Springer, New York
Ovaskainen O (2008) Analytical and numerical tools for diffusion-based movement models. Theor Popul Biol 2:198–211
Ovaskainen O, Cornell S (2006a) Asymptotically exact analysis of stochastic metapopulation dynamics with explicit spatial structure. Theor Popul Biol 69:13–33
Ovaskainen O, Cornell S (2006b) Space and stochasticity in population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:12781–12786
Ovaskainen O, Rekola H, Meyke E, Arjas E (2008) Bayesian methods for analyzing movements in heterogeneous landscapes from mark-recapture data. Ecology 89:542–554
Patlak C (1953a) A mathematical contribution to the study of orientation of organisms. Bull Math Biophys 15:431–476
Patlak C (1953b) Random walk with persistence and external bias. Bull Math Biophys 15:311–338
Patterson T, Thomas L, Wilcox C, Ovaskainen O, Matthiopoulos J (2008) State–space models of individual animal movement. Trends Ecol Evol 23:87–94
Petrovskii S, Morozov A (2009) Dispersal in a statistically structured population: fat tails revisited. Am Nat 173:278–289
Redner S (2001) A guide to first-passage processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Roland J, Keyghobadi N, Fownes S (2000) Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81:1642–1653
Royle JA, Kéry M, Guélat J (2011) Spatial capture-recapture models for search-encounter data. Methods in Ecol Evol 2:602–611
Skellam JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196–218
Stephens D, Brown J, Ydenberg R (2007) Foraging: behavior and ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer, Sunderland
Wirsing A, Cameron K, Heithaus M (2010) Spatial responses to predators vary with prey escape mode. Anim Behav 79:531–537
Acknowledgements
We thank Jim Anderson and Finn Laidre for inspiring many of the ideas in this manuscript. Len Thomas, Tiago Splitter and two anonymous reviewers provided close readings and useful suggestions. O.O. was funded by the Academy of Finland (grant 129636) and the European Research Council (ERC Starting Grant 205905).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurarie, E., Ovaskainen, O. Towards a general formalization of encounter rates in ecology. Theor Ecol 6, 189–202 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-012-0170-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-012-0170-4