Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing Discomfort Levels During Facial Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Using Discomfort Level Scale: A Preliminary Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary aim of the current study was to evaluate discomfort levels of facial NMES in healthy volunteers. Eight participants completed the Discomfort Level Scale (DLS) following each motor level facial neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) session. Each participant completed 12 sessions of facial NMES for a total of 96 NMES treatments. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient demonstrated a significant correlation between the facial NMES intensity level and DLS (p < 0.001). This study demonstrated that the DLS is a useful tool to check for discomfort levels in patients who receive facial NMES. Further, this study provides strong support for the tolerability of facial NMES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [MS].

References

  1. Sheffler LS, Chae J (2007) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation. Muscle Nerve. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Miki H, Hida W, Chonan T, Kikuchi Y, Takishima T (1989) Effects of submental electrical stimulation during sleep on upper airway patency in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/140.5.1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mezzanotte WS, Tangel DJ, White DP (1992) Waking genioglossal electromyogram in sleep apnea patients versus normal controls (a neuromuscular compensatory mechanism). J Clin Invest. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI115751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Isono S, Tanaka A, Nishino T (1999) Effects of tongue electrical stimulation on pharyngeal mechanics in anaesthetized patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. EurRespir J. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.99.14612589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oliven A, Schnall RP, Pillar G, Gavriely N, Odeh M (2001) Sublingual electrical stimulation of the tongue during wakefulness and sleep. RespirPhysiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00254-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Randerath WJ, Galetke W (2006) The upper airway muscles: structural and pathophysiological aspects in the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Somnologie. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-054X.2006.00104.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alakram P, Puckree T (2017) Effects of electrical stimulation in early Bells palsy on facial disability index scores. S Afr J Physiother. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v67i2.44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kavanagh S, Newell J, Hennessy M, Sadick N (2012) Use of a neuromuscular electrical stimulation device for facial muscle toning: a randomized, controlled trial. J CosmetDermatol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Safi MF, Wright-Harp W, Lucker JR, Payne JC (2017) Effect of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation on labial and lingual muscles in healthy volunteers. Int J Rehabil Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Safi MF, Wright-Harp W, Lucker JR, Payne JC, Harris O (2018) Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on labial and lingual weakness: a single-case preexperimental study. Top GeriatrRehabil. https://doi.org/10.1097/TGR.0000000000000185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Humbert IA, Poletto CJ, Saxon KG et al (2005) The effect of surface electrical stimulation on hyolaryngeal movement in normal individuals at rest and during swallowing. J ApplPhysiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00348.2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ludlow CL, Humbert I, Saxon K, Poletto C, Sonies B, Crujido L (2007) Effects of surface electrical stimulation both at rest and during swallowing in chronic pharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-006-9029-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nam HS, Beom J, Oh BM, Han TR (2013) Kinematic effects of hyolaryngeal electrical stimulation therapy on hyoid excursion and laryngeal elevation. Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9465-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawakami T, Ishihara M, Mihara M (2001) Distribution density of intraepidermal nerve fibers in normal human skin. J Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2001.tb00091.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Connor NP, Abbs JH (1998) Orofacial proprioception: analyses of cutaneous mechanoreceptor population properties using artificial neural networks. J CommunDisord. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(98)00024-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hung J, Samman N (2009) Facial skin sensibility in a young healthy chinese population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndodontology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.10.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kliger M, Stahl S, Haddad M, Suzan E, Adler R, Eisenberg E (2015) Measuring the intensity of chronic pain: are the visual analogue scale and the verbal rating scale interchangeable? Pain Pract. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP (2011) Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Littman GS, Walker BR, Schneider BE (1985) Reassessment of verbal and visual analog ratings in analgesic studies. ClinPharmacolTher. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1985.127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guyatt GH, Townsend M, Berman LB, Keller JL (1987) A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. J Chronic Dis 40(12):1129–1133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Averbuch M, Katzper M (2004) Assessment of visual analog versus categorical scale for measurement of osteoarthritis pain. J ClinPharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270004263995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Safi MF et al (2014) A review of electrical stimulation and its effect on lingual, labial and buccal muscle strength. Int J Orofacial Myol 40:12–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL (2009) Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Speech Language Pathology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE

    Mohammed Safi

Authors
  1. Mohammed Safi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Safi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safi, M. Assessing Discomfort Levels During Facial Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Using Discomfort Level Scale: A Preliminary Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74 (Suppl 3), 5275–5279 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02173-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02173-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation