Skip to main content
Log in

Solving combined economic emission dispatch model via hybrid differential evaluation and crow search algorithm

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the major aspects regarding the operation and planning of a power system was to reduce the emission of pollutions and fuel costs in thermal power plants. This issue was resolved as an optimization crisis, where the reduction of emission of pollutions and fuel cost was done and it is known as the combined economic emission dispatch (CEED) problem. Various techniques were introduced for improving the performance of the power plants with respect to algorithm reliability, solution accuracy, global optimality, and convergence speed for resolving the CEED issues. Therefore, this work establishes a CEED approach for the smart grid system and resolves it by exploiting the hybridized concepts of the crow search algorithm (CSA) and differential evolution (DE). The hybridized model of the two well-known schemes is achieved by updating the solutions of both the schemes and merging them with the random searching model. Thus, the new approach is named as hybrid DE and CSA model. The CEED approach is subjected to reduce its cost and therefore, sufficient trade-off between the emission and economic costs could be sustained. The presented hybrid scheme is simulated on 3 diverse bus systems and its performance is evaluated over other state-of-the-art models in terms of CPU time and generation strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CEED:

Combined economic emission dispatch

CSA:

Crow search algorithm

DE:

Differential evolution

hDECSA:

Hybrid DE and CSA

PSO:

Particle swarm optimization

GU:

Generating units

LM:

Lagrangian multiplier

FLC:

Fuzzy logic control

ANN:

Artificial neural network

GA:

Genetic algorithm

BA:

Bat algorithm

HD:

High dimensional

FPA:

Flower pollination algorithm

ELD:

Emission load dispatch

VPE:

Valve point effect

MPSO:

Modulated particle swarm optimization

POZ:

Prohibited operating zones

CPU:

Central processing unit

VPE:

Valve point effect

SOA:

Spiral optimization algorithm

AWL:

Avoidance of worst locations

DEED:

Dynamic EED

AWL:

Avoidance of worst locations

GIDN:

Gradually increasing directed neighbourhood

MARL:

Multi-agent reinforcement learning

CNO:

Collective neurodynamic optimization

PNN:

Projection neural network

MG:

Micro grid

MHS:

Modified harmony search

References

  1. Liang H, Liu Y, Li F, Shen Y (2018) A multiobjective hybrid bat algorithm for combined economic/emission dispatch. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 101:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdelaziz AY, Ali ES, Elazim SMA (2016) Combined economic and emission dispatch solution using flower pollination algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 80:264–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdelaziz AY, Ali ES, Elazim SMA (2016) Implementation of flower pollination algorithm for solving economic load dispatch and combined economic emission dispatch problems in power systems. Energy 101:506–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benasla L, Belmadani A, Rahli M (2014) Spiral optimization algorithm for solving combined economic and emission dispatch. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 62:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mason K, Duggan J, Howley E (2017) Multi-objective dynamic economic emission dispatch using particle swarm optimisation variants. Neurocomputing 270:188–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang T, He X, Huang T, Li C, Zhang W (2017) Collective neurodynamic optimization for economic emission dispatch problem considering valve point effect in microgrid. Neural Netw 93:126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Basu M (2014) Fuel constrained economic emission dispatch using non dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Energy 78:649–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elattar EE (2018) Modified harmony search algorithm for combined economic emission dispatch of microgrid incorporating renewable sources. Energy 159:496–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma H, Yang Z, You P, Fei M (2017) Multi-objective biogeography-based optimization for dynamic economic emission load dispatch considering plug-in electric vehicles charging. Energy 135:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zou D, Li S, Li Z, Kong X (2017) A new global particle swarm optimization for the economic emission dispatch with or without transmission losses. Energy Convers Manag 139:45–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Modiri-Delshad M, Rahim NA (2016) Multi-objective backtracking search algorithm for economic emission dispatch problem. Appl Soft Comput 40:479–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goudarzi A, Li Y, Xiang J (2020) A hybrid non-linear time-varying double-weighted particle swarm optimization for solving non-convex combined environmental economic dispatch problem. Appl Soft Comput 86:105894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shilaja C, Ravi K (2017) Optimization of emission/economic dispatch using euclidean affine flower pollination algorithm (eFPA) and binary FPA (BFPA) in solar photo voltaic generation. Renew Energy 107:550–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajan A, Malakar T (2016) Optimum economic and emission dispatch using exchange market algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 82:545–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jadoun VK, Gupta N, Niazi KR, Swarnkar A (2015) Modulated particle swarm optimization for economic emission dispatch. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 73:80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Palanichamy C, Babu NS (2008) Analytical solution for combined economic and emissions dispatch. Electr Power Syst Res 78(7):1129–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Narimani H, Razavi S-E, Azizivahed A, Naderi E, Narimani MR (2018) A multi-objective framework for multi-area economic emission dispatch. Energy 154:126–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sahu BK, Pati S, Panda S (2014) Hybrid differential evolution particle swarm optimisation optimised fuzzy proportional–integral derivative controller for automatic generation control of interconnected power system. IET Gener Transm Distrib 8(11):1789–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaabani YA, Seifi AR, Kouhanjani MJ (2017) Stochastic multi-objective optimization of combined heat and power economic/emission dispatch. Energy 141:1892–1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lokeshgupta B, Sivasubramani S (2018) Multi-objective dynamic economic and emission dispatch with demand side management. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 97:334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghorbani N, Babaei E, Sadikoglu F (2017) Exchange market algorithm for multi-objective economic emission dispatch and reliability. Proc Comput Sci 120:633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Amiri M, Khanmohammadi S, Badamchizadeh MA (2018) Floating search space: a new idea for efficient solving the economic and emission dispatch problem. Energy 158:564–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Secui DC (2017) Large-scale multi-area economic/emission dispatch based on a new symbiotic organisms search algorithm. Energy Convers Manag 154:203–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mason K, Duggan J, Howley E (2018) A multi-objective neural network trained with differential evolution for dynamic economic emission dispatch. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 100:201–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kheshti M, Ding L, Ma S, Zhao B (2018) Double weighted particle swarm optimization to non-convex wind penetrated emission/economic dispatch and multiple fuel option systems. Renew Energy 125:1021–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang S, Du P, Chen C, Zhong W, Alphones A (2019) Robust 3D indoor VLP system based on ANN using hybrid RSS/PDOA. IEEE Access 7:47769–47780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Anand H, Ramasubbu R (2018) A real time pricing strategy for remote micro-grid with economic emission dispatch and stochastic renewable energy sources. Renew Energy 127:779–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Askarzadeh A (2016) A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput Struct 169:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kulkarni PS, Kothari AG, Kothari DP (2000) Combined economic and emission dispatch using improved back propagation neural network. Int J Electr Mach Power Syst 28:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Güvenç U, Sonmez Y, Duman S, Yorükeren N (2012) Combined economic and emission dispatch solution using gravitational search algorithm. Sci Iran D Comput Sci Eng Electr Eng 19(6):1754–1762

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yadav NK (2019) Hybridization of particle swarm optimization with differential evolution for solving combined economic emission dispatch model for smart grid. J Eng Res 7(3):244–257

    Google Scholar 

  32. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/mlc-downloads/downloads/submissions/20984/versions/1/previews/pso1/psotest.m/index.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunjan Bhargava.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhargava, G., Yadav, N.K. Solving combined economic emission dispatch model via hybrid differential evaluation and crow search algorithm. Evol. Intel. 15, 1161–1169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00357-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00357-0

Keywords

Navigation