Skip to main content
Log in

Spectral plots and the representation and interpretation of biological data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theory in Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is basic question in biology and other fields to identify the characteristic properties that on one hand are shared by structures from a particular realm, like gene regulation, protein–protein interaction or neural networks or foodwebs, and that on the other hand distinguish them from other structures. We introduce and apply a general method, based on the spectrum of the normalized graph Laplacian, that yields representations, the spectral plots, that allow us to find and visualize such properties systematically. We present such visualizations for a wide range of biological networks and compare them with those for networks derived from theoretical schemes. The differences that we find are quite striking and suggest that the search for universal properties of biological networks should be complemented by an understanding of more specific features of biological organization principles at different scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some general references for graph theory are Bolobás (1998) and Godsil and Royle (2001).

  2. As always in mathematics, there is a notion of isomorphism: Graphs Γ1 and Γ2 are called isomorphic when there is a one-to-one map ρ between the vertices of Γ1 and Γ2 that preserves the neighborhood relationship, that is ij precisely if ρ(i)∼ ρ(j). Isomorphic graphs are considered to be the same because they cannot be distinguished by their properties. In other words, when we speak about different graphs, we mean non-isomorphic ones.

  3. In more precise terms, the degrees are Poisson distributed in the limit of an infinite graph size.

  4. Our convention here is different from Jost and Joy (2001), Jost (2007a, b), and Banerjee and Jost (2007b).

  5. All networks are taken as undirected and unweighted. Thus, we suppress some potentially important aspects of the underlying data, but as our plots will show, we can still detect distinctive qualitative patterns. In fact, one can also compute the spectrum of directed and weighted networks, and doing that on our data will reveal further structures, but this is not explored in the present paper.

References

  • Albert R, Barabási A-L (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74:47–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atay FM, Jost J, Wende A (2004) Delays, connection topology, and synchronization of coupled chaotic maps. Phys Rev Lett 92(14):144101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atay FM, Bıyıkoğlu T, Jost J (2006) Synchronization of networks with prescribed degree distributions. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I 53(1):92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atay FM, Bıyıkoğlu T, Jost J (2007) Network synchronization: spectral versus statistical properties. Phys D (to appear)

  • Banerjee A, Jost J (2007a) Laplacian spectrum and protein–protein interaction networks (preprint)

  • Banerjee A, Jost J (2007b) On the spectrum of the normalized graph Laplacian (preprint)

  • Banerjee A, Jost J (2007c) Graph spectra as a systematic tool in computational biology. Discrete Appl Math (submitted)

  • Barabási A-L, Albert RA (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolobás B (1998) Modern graph theory. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolobás B (2001) Random graphs. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung F (1997) Spectral graph theory. AMS, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorogovtsev SN, Mendes JFF (2003) Evolution of Networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdős P, Rényi A (1959) On random graphs. Public Math Debrecen 6:290–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Godsil C, Royle G (2001) Algebraic graph theory. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipsen M, Mikhailov AS (2002) Evolutionary reconstruction of networks. Phys Rev E 66(4):046109

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltval ZN, Barabási AL (2000) The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407(6804):651–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jost J (2007a) Mathematical methods in biology and neurobiology, monograph (to appear)

  • Jost J (2007b) Dynamical networks. In: Feng JF, Jost J, Qian MP (eds) Networks: from biology to theory. Springer, Berlin

  • Jost J, Joy MP (2001) Spectral properties and synchronization in coupled map lattices. Phys Rev E 65(1):16201–16209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost J, Joy MP (2002) Evolving networks with distance preferences. Phys Rev E 66:36126–36132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merris R (1994) Laplacian matrices of graphs—a survey. Lin Alg Appl 198:143–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chklovskii D, Alon U (2002) Network Motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298(5594):824–827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohar B (1997) Some applications of Laplace eigenvalues of graphs. In: Hahn G, Sabidussi G (eds) Graph symmetry: algebraic methods and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 227–277

  • Newman M (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohno S (1970) Evolution by gene duplication. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen-Orr SS, Milo R, Mangan S, Alon U (2002) Network Motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli. Nat Genet 31(1):64–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1955) On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 42:425–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez A (2002) Growing networks with local rules: Preferential attachment, clustering hierarchy and degree correlations. cond-mat/0211528

  • Wagner A (1994) Evolution of gene networks by gene duplications—a mathematical model and its implications on genome organization. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 91(10):4387–4391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘Small-World’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S (1986) The structure of the nervous-system of the Nematode Caenorhabditis-Elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 314(1165):1–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe KH, Shields DC (1997) Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387(6634):708–713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P, Wilson R (2005) A study of graph spectra for comparing graphs. In: British machine vision conference 2005, BMVA, pp 679–688

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anirban Banerjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banerjee, A., Jost, J. Spectral plots and the representation and interpretation of biological data. Theory Biosci. 126, 15–21 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-007-0005-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-007-0005-9

Keywords

Navigation