Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between supply chain integration and performance

  • Published:
Operations Management Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyzes survey-based studies examining the benefits of supply chain integration (SCI) and presents opportunities for further empirical examination. The literature review method is used to evaluate the empirical research published from 1990 to 2012. The analysis reveals that internal integration serves as a foundation for establishing external collaboration. There is empirical evidence on the positive effect of supplier integration on performance, whereas the findings on benefits through customer integration are conflicting. While researchers have made significant progress in our understanding of SCI, there is a substantial need for more work to provide in-depth insights into the potential of SCI and to improve the methodological issues. This study makes three contributions. First, this study expands the current understanding of benefits and considerations in implementing internal, supplier, and customer integration. Second, this study provides a critique of the empirical work and offers research agendas that can stimulate future researchers to carefully explore the topic. Finally, this study enhances the quality of analysis by employing the five-step approach proposed by Vokurka and O’Leary-Kelly (J Oper Manag 18(4):485–501, 2000).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allred CR, Fawcett SE, Wallin C, Magnan GM (2011) A dynamic collaboration capability as a source of competitive advantage. Decis Sci 42(1):129–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi HH, Lin DKJ (2009) RFID-enabled discovery of supply networks. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 56(1):129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao M, Vonderembse MA, Zhang Q, Ragu-Nathan TS (2010) Supply chain collaboration: conceptualisation and instrument development. Int J Prod Res 48(22):6613–6635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao M, Zhang Q (2011) Supply chain collaboration: impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. J Oper Manag 29(3):163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Mattioda DD, Daugherty PJ (2007) Firm-wide integration and firm performance. Int J Logist Manag 18(1):5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi TY, Kim Y (2008) Structural embeddedness and supplier management: a network perspective. J Supply Chain Manag 44(4):5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins PD, Menguc B (2006) The implications of socialization and integration in supply chain management. J Oper Manag 24(5):604–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danese P, Romano P (2011) Supply chain integration and efficiency performance: a study on the interactions between customer and supplier integration. Supply Chain Manag Int J 16(4):220–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danese P, Romano P (2012) Relationship between downstream integration, performance measurement systems and supply network efficiency. Int J Prod Res 50(7):2002–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Narasimhan R, Talluri S (2006) Supplier integration – Finding an optimal configuration. J Oper Manag 24(5):563–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj S, Krajewski L, Wei JC (2007) Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: the role of production information integration in the supply chain. J Oper Manag 25(6):1199–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droge C, Jayaram J, Vickery SK (2004) The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance. J Oper Manag 22(6):557–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droge C, Vickery SK, Jacobs MA (2012) Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study. Int J Prod Econ 137(2):250–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabbe-Costes N, Jahre M (2008) Supply chain integration and performance: a review of the evidence. Int J Logist Manag 19(2):130–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn BB, Huo B, Zhao X (2010) The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. J Oper Manag 28(1):58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich MT, Westbrook R (2001) Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. J Oper Manag 19(2):185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz J (2011) Studying supply chains from a social network perspective. J Supply Chain Manag 47(1):4–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germain R, Iyer KNS (2006) The interaction of internal and downstream integration and its association with performance. J Bus Logist 27(2):29–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez C, Ventura E (2005) Logistics-production, logistics-marketing and external integration: their impact on performance. Int J oper Prod Manag 25(1):20–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali DR, Madhavan R (2001) Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective. Acad Manag Rev 26(3):431–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal R, Slotegraaf RJ (2007) Embeddedness of organizational capabilities. Decis Sci 38(3):451–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield R, Petersen K, Cousins P, Lawson B (2009) An organizational entrepreneurship model of supply management integration and performance outcomes. Int J Oper Prod Manag 29(2):100–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Lai KK (2012) Supply chain integration and service oriented transformation: evidence from Chinese equipment manufacturers. Int J Prod Econ 135(2):791–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo B (2012) The impact of supply chain integration on company performance: an organizational capability perspective. Supply Chain Manag Int J 17(6):596–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SW (2006) Effects of supply chain management practices, integration and competition capability on performance. Supply Chain Manag Int J 11(3):241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SW (2009) An investigation on the direct and indirect effect of supply chain integration on firm performance. Int J Prod Econ 119(2):328–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufteros XA, Edwin Cheng TC, Lai KH (2007) Black-box and gray-box supplier integration in product development: antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size. J Oper Manag 25(4):847–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufteros XA, Rawski GE, Rupak R (2010) Organizational integration for product development: the effects on glitches, on-time execution of engineering change orders, and market success. Decis Sci 41(1):49–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufteros X, Vonderembse M, Jayaram J (2005) Internal and external integration for product development: the contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decis Sci 36(1):97–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau AKW, Yam RCM, Tang EPY (2010) Supply chain integration and product modularity: an empirical study of product performance for selected Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Int J Oper Prod Manag 30(1):20–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Shah R, Schroeder RG (2012) The relationships among functional integration, mass customization, and firm performance. Int J Prod Res 50(3):677–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockström M, Schadel J, Harrison N, Moser R, Malhotra MK (2010) Antecedents to supplier integration in the automotive industry: a multiple-case study of foreign subsidiaries in China. J Oper Manag 28(3):240–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods 1(2):130–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquez AC, Bianchi C, Gupta JND (2004) Operational and financial effectiveness of e-collaboration tools in supply chain integration. Eur J Oper Res 159(2):348–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyano-Fuentes J, Sacristán-Díaz M, Martínez-Jurado PJ (2012) Cooperation in the supply chain and lean production adoption evidence from the Spanish automotive industry. Int J Oper Prod Manag 32(9):1075–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan R, Swink M, Viswanathan S (2010) On decisions for integration implementation: an examination of complementarities between product-process technology integration and supply chain integration. Decis Sci 41(2):355–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh J, Rhee S (2008) The influence of supplier capabilities and technology uncertainty on manufacturer-supplier collaboration: a study of the Korean automotive industry. Int J Oper Prod Manag 28(6):490–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olhager J, Prajogo D (2012) The impact of manufacturing and supply chain improvement initiatives: a survey comparing make-to-order and make-to-stock firms. Omega 40(2):159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell M (2004) Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics. J Oper Manag 22(5):459–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen KJ, Handfield RB, Ragatz GL (2005) Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. J Oper Manag 23(3–4):371–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo D, Chowdhury M, Yeung ACL, Cheng TCE (2012) The relationship between supplier management and firm’s operational performance: a multi-dimensional perspective. Int J Prod Econ 136(1):123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo D, Olhager J (2012) Supply chain integration and performance: the effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. Int J Prod Econ 135(1):514–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragatz GL, Handfield RB, Petersen KJ (2002) Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty. J Bus Res 55(5):389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ED, Roth AV, Dean JW (2003) The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: an exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers. J Oper Manag 21(4):437–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rungtusanatham MJ, Choi TY, Hollingworth DG, Wu Z, Forza C (2003) Survey research in operations management: historical analyses. J Oper Manag 21(4):475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed KA, Malhotra MK, Grover V (2005) Examining the impact of interorganizational systems on process efficiency and sourcing leverage in buyer–supplier dyads. Decis Sci 36(3):365–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders NR (2007) An empirical study of the impact of e-business technologies on organizational collaboration and performance. J Oper Manag 25(6):1332–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders NR (2008) Pattern of information technology use: the impact on buyer-suppler coordination and performance. J Oper Manag 26(3):349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling MA, Phelps CC (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: the impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Manag Sci 53(7):1113–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song M, Thieme J (2009) The role of suppliers in market intelligence gathering for radical and incremental innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 26(1):43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swink M, Narasimhan R, Wang C (2007) Managing beyond the factory walls: effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance. J Oper Manag 25(1):148–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vaart T, Van Donk DP (2008) A critical review of survey-based research in supply chain integration. Int J Prod Econ 111(1):42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vereecke A, Muylle S (2006) Performance improvement through supply chain collaboration in Europe. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26(11):1176–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery SK, Jayaram J, Droge C, Calantone R (2003) The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. J Oper Manag 21(5):523–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villena VH, Gomez-Mejia LR, Revilla E (2009) The decision of the supply chain executive to support or impede supply chain integration: a multidisciplinary behavioral agency perspective. Decis Sci 40(4):635–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vokurka RJ, O’Leary-Kelly SW (2000) A review of empirical research on manufacturing flexibility. J Oper Manag 18(4):485–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zailani S, Rajagopal P (2005) Supply chain integration and performance: US versus East Asian companies. Supply Chain Manag Int J 10(5):379–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Huo B, Selen W, Yeung JHY (2011) The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration. J Oper Manag 29(1–2):17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Young Kim.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Empirical studies on the relationship between supply chain integration and performance
Table 2 Summary of methodological issues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, DY. Relationship between supply chain integration and performance. Oper Manag Res 6, 74–90 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-013-0079-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-013-0079-0

Keywords

Navigation